Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 150.3 (148.2, 152.5) N/A 3,882 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Woods County Rural Yes 116.0 (79.8, 165.2) 70 (18, 75) 6 falling falling trend -20.6 (-39.2, -1.0)
Creek County Urban No 153.9 (139.0, 170.2) 41 (17, 63) 82 falling falling trend -11.1 (-19.9, -1.0)
Garvin County Rural No 182.7 (154.8, 214.5) 15 (2, 57) 32 falling falling trend -10.0 (-18.3, -0.6)
Texas County Rural No 136.2 (105.4, 173.1) 59 (10, 75) 13 falling falling trend -5.2 (-14.9, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 136.7 (111.5, 166.2) 58 (15, 75) 21 falling falling trend -4.2 (-12.5, -1.4)
Latimer County Rural Yes 115.5 (84.1, 156.9) 71 (22, 75) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.5)
Greer County Rural Yes 110.4 (70.0, 171.3) 75 (12, 75) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.0)
Pawnee County Urban No 140.5 (111.4, 175.8) 55 (12, 75) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Pontotoc County Rural No 135.6 (115.9, 157.9) 60 (25, 74) 36 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Craig County Rural No 161.8 (128.3, 202.4) 33 (2, 73) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Tulsa County Urban No 138.3 (133.2, 143.6) 57 (44, 65) 577 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Wagoner County Urban No 128.9 (115.5, 143.5) 66 (41, 74) 71 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.2, 0.0)
Comanche County Urban No 148.6 (135.6, 162.7) 47 (24, 66) 99 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Logan County Urban No 126.8 (109.9, 145.8) 67 (37, 75) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Pushmataha County Rural No 173.7 (136.2, 220.3) 22 (1, 70) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Delaware County Rural No 129.6 (112.0, 149.7) 64 (34, 74) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Beckham County Rural No 155.6 (126.4, 189.9) 40 (5, 72) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Bryan County Rural No 142.0 (123.9, 162.3) 53 (22, 72) 46 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Canadian County Urban No 129.2 (118.8, 140.3) 65 (47, 73) 116 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Woodward County Rural No 139.3 (111.3, 172.7) 56 (11, 75) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Beaver County Rural Yes 113.8 (69.7, 179.6) 73 (8, 75) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 2.7)
Grady County Urban No 147.8 (130.6, 166.9) 49 (20, 69) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Washington County Rural No 153.5 (136.3, 172.5) 43 (14, 66) 63 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Kingfisher County Rural No 133.8 (102.8, 171.9) 62 (10, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Noble County Rural No 134.6 (101.2, 177.1) 61 (11, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Choctaw County Rural No 160.4 (128.0, 199.4) 37 (3, 72) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.8)
Harmon County Rural No 190.0 (102.3, 325.7) 11 (1, 75) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.1)
Murray County Rural No 160.5 (126.4, 202.0) 35 (2, 73) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Osage County Urban No 143.4 (126.1, 162.9) 52 (22, 72) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Oklahoma County Urban No 151.3 (146.3, 156.5) 45 (31, 55) 711 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Rogers County Urban No 144.8 (131.8, 158.9) 50 (28, 67) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Cherokee County Rural No 166.2 (146.5, 187.9) 30 (7, 59) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Cleveland County Urban No 130.7 (123.1, 138.7) 63 (49, 71) 228 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Garfield County Urban No 148.3 (131.6, 166.7) 48 (20, 69) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Le Flore County Rural No 168.9 (149.6, 190.3) 28 (7, 57) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Washita County Rural Yes 116.9 (84.1, 159.4) 69 (18, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Adair County Rural No 183.2 (150.3, 221.5) 14 (1, 62) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Carter County Rural No 177.6 (157.5, 199.6) 17 (4, 51) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Lincoln County Urban No 153.7 (132.4, 177.8) 42 (12, 69) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Kay County Rural No 172.3 (151.9, 195.0) 24 (5, 56) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Major County Rural Yes 113.8 (77.3, 163.7) 72 (14, 75) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.3)
Muskogee County Rural No 173.0 (156.0, 191.6) 23 (7, 50) 79 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Ottawa County Rural No 180.0 (155.2, 208.0) 16 (2, 53) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Dewey County Rural No 166.6 (107.1, 250.3) 29 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.5)
Seminole County Rural No 175.3 (147.3, 207.4) 21 (2, 62) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Stephens County Rural No 160.0 (140.9, 181.2) 38 (11, 65) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Tillman County Rural No 177.5 (129.0, 240.7) 18 (1, 74) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.7)
Haskell County Rural No 187.7 (148.1, 235.9) 12 (1, 65) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Johnston County Rural No 184.5 (140.6, 238.8) 13 (1, 70) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Love County Rural No 162.9 (120.9, 215.5) 32 (1, 74) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Mayes County Rural No 172.0 (150.1, 196.6) 25 (4, 58) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
McClain County Urban No 152.2 (131.4, 175.5) 44 (13, 70) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Custer County Rural No 140.8 (115.6, 170.0) 54 (14, 74) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Hughes County Rural No 203.2 (162.5, 252.2) 5 (1, 54) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Pittsburg County Rural No 176.8 (156.6, 199.3) 19 (4, 51) 59 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 171.5 (155.3, 189.0) 26 (8, 52) 85 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Marshall County Rural No 150.1 (121.1, 185.1) 46 (8, 73) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
McIntosh County Rural No 162.9 (135.7, 195.1) 31 (5, 69) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Okmulgee County Urban No 176.4 (153.6, 202.0) 20 (3, 54) 46 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Nowata County Rural No 196.9 (151.9, 252.6) 9 (1, 66) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Sequoyah County Urban No 206.0 (182.7, 231.8) 4 (1, 28) 59 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Payne County Rural No 161.4 (144.1, 180.3) 34 (11, 62) 67 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Coal County Rural No 199.8 (141.5, 277.2) 7 (1, 71) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.9)
McCurtain County Rural No 202.8 (175.6, 233.3) 6 (1, 34) 42 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Atoka County Rural No 157.3 (122.9, 199.5) 39 (3, 73) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.0)
Caddo County Rural No 207.7 (176.5, 243.2) 3 (1, 37) 34 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.6)
Alfalfa County Rural No 160.4 (109.8, 233.2) 36 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.1)
Jefferson County Rural No 214.1 (151.9, 296.1) 1 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 3.8)
Okfuskee County Rural No 198.4 (153.3, 253.7) 8 (1, 63) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.3)
Kiowa County Rural No 194.1 (146.0, 254.5) 10 (1, 70) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.3)
Grant County Rural No 169.7 (104.2, 263.5) 27 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 5.3)
Blaine County Rural No 210.1 (161.8, 270.0) 2 (1, 57) 14 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 11.8)
Cotton County Urban Yes 118.2 (77.5, 177.3) 68 (7, 75) 5 stable stable trend 32.3 (-5.7, 60.6)
Harper County Rural No 143.9 (82.1, 241.7) 51 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural Yes 113.1 (63.7, 193.9) 74 (3, 75) 3
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top