Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina N/A No 132.1 (130.4, 133.8) N/A 4,972 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Berkeley County Urban No 126.0 (117.4, 135.0) 36 (22, 45) 170 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.3, -3.1)
Oconee County Rural Yes 113.3 (101.7, 126.1) 45 (28, 46) 78 falling falling trend -4.7 (-11.7, -1.8)
Jasper County Urban Yes 117.1 (97.8, 139.8) 43 (17, 46) 29 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Allendale County Rural No 128.6 (91.8, 179.0) 34 (1, 46) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-15.3, -0.4)
Williamsburg County Rural No 140.3 (120.2, 163.5) 22 (4, 45) 38 stable stable trend -1.9 (-20.5, 3.8)
Charleston County Urban Yes 116.6 (110.9, 122.5) 44 (35, 46) 338 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
McCormick County Rural No 134.2 (100.5, 182.4) 30 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Beaufort County Urban Yes 111.0 (103.6, 118.8) 46 (38, 46) 201 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
York County Urban No 128.2 (120.7, 136.0) 35 (22, 43) 227 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.5)
Cherokee County Rural No 147.6 (130.4, 166.6) 16 (3, 40) 56 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Florence County Urban No 131.3 (121.2, 142.2) 32 (17, 43) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Dillon County Rural No 164.7 (139.7, 193.3) 7 (1, 34) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Dorchester County Urban No 125.5 (115.6, 136.0) 38 (21, 45) 125 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Kershaw County Urban No 160.8 (145.0, 178.1) 11 (1, 26) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-4.7, -0.3)
Spartanburg County Urban No 135.6 (128.7, 142.7) 29 (17, 38) 303 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Aiken County Urban No 125.7 (117.0, 134.9) 37 (23, 45) 169 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Greenville County Urban No 123.7 (118.5, 129.0) 40 (29, 44) 443 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Richland County Urban No 139.6 (132.9, 146.5) 23 (15, 33) 341 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Clarendon County Rural No 147.5 (126.6, 171.4) 17 (1, 43) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Edgefield County Urban No 135.8 (112.9, 162.8) 28 (3, 46) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Georgetown County Rural No 124.8 (111.1, 140.0) 39 (17, 46) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Sumter County Urban No 137.5 (125.7, 150.3) 26 (12, 42) 104 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Chesterfield County Rural No 143.7 (125.2, 164.4) 20 (4, 43) 46 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Greenwood County Rural No 139.5 (125.4, 154.8) 24 (8, 42) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Lexington County Urban No 132.2 (125.1, 139.6) 31 (19, 41) 268 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Pickens County Urban No 123.5 (113.1, 134.6) 41 (22, 46) 111 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Darlington County Urban No 156.9 (140.9, 174.4) 13 (2, 30) 75 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Horry County Urban No 138.0 (131.9, 144.4) 25 (16, 35) 442 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Lee County Rural No 141.0 (112.0, 176.2) 21 (1, 46) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.2)
Anderson County Urban No 129.1 (120.9, 137.7) 33 (20, 43) 194 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 2.0)
Chester County Urban No 155.5 (133.4, 180.6) 14 (1, 40) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Lancaster County Urban Yes 121.8 (110.8, 133.7) 42 (23, 46) 97 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
Marion County Rural No 165.1 (141.7, 191.9) 6 (1, 32) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Calhoun County Urban No 144.5 (115.4, 180.3) 19 (1, 46) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Marlboro County Rural No 173.9 (147.7, 204.1) 2 (1, 27) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Orangeburg County Rural No 153.5 (140.0, 168.1) 15 (3, 29) 104 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Saluda County Urban No 137.0 (111.6, 167.5) 27 (3, 46) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Colleton County Rural No 173.1 (151.7, 196.9) 3 (1, 22) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Union County Urban No 164.1 (140.0, 191.8) 8 (1, 37) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Abbeville County Rural No 145.1 (121.3, 172.9) 18 (2, 46) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Fairfield County Urban No 160.0 (132.3, 192.7) 12 (1, 42) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Hampton County Rural No 174.4 (143.1, 211.3) 1 (1, 33) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Bamberg County Rural No 162.3 (129.9, 201.9) 10 (1, 44) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Newberry County Rural No 166.5 (145.1, 190.4) 5 (1, 28) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Barnwell County Rural No 163.6 (136.0, 195.9) 9 (1, 39) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Laurens County Urban No 172.0 (155.6, 189.7) 4 (1, 19) 87 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 3:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top