Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 122.8 (122.0, 123.5) N/A 19,969 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.7)
United States N/A No 126.3 (126.1, 126.6) N/A 287,034 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
Stephens County Rural Yes 122.1 (86.4, 169.8) 169 (10, 220) 8 falling falling trend -17.8 (-34.0, -1.7)
Hutchinson County Rural No 148.6 (120.0, 182.5) 80 (8, 203) 20 falling falling trend -13.1 (-23.9, -1.9)
Bell County Urban No 129.3 (122.0, 136.9) 145 (94, 181) 244 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.6, -1.5)
Kimble County Rural Yes 98.6 (59.6, 162.0) 214 (15, 220) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.5, -0.9)
Winkler County Rural Yes 84.6 (48.8, 137.3) 218 (29, 220) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -0.5)
Sutton County Rural No 148.2 (84.5, 246.1) 81 (1, 220) 3 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.0, 0.7)
Limestone County Rural No 134.4 (110.2, 162.9) 126 (21, 213) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-13.5, -0.5)
Kendall County Urban Yes 100.6 (86.1, 117.2) 211 (143, 219) 37 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.0)
Titus County Rural No 135.7 (112.6, 162.3) 120 (20, 210) 25 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Zapata County Rural Yes 78.5 (51.9, 114.1) 220 (116, 220) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.2)
Rains County Rural No 138.4 (107.6, 177.3) 111 (8, 214) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Gaines County Rural No 134.2 (100.3, 175.3) 127 (6, 218) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.2)
Travis County Urban Yes 101.4 (97.7, 105.3) 210 (191, 215) 596 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Caldwell County Urban Yes 117.9 (100.8, 137.3) 183 (70, 215) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Denton County Urban Yes 104.3 (100.1, 108.7) 206 (183, 213) 481 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.4)
Aransas County Urban No 129.5 (108.4, 154.5) 144 (30, 212) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Bandera County Urban Yes 115.8 (95.1, 141.1) 192 (63, 218) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Brown County Rural Yes 117.3 (100.2, 136.8) 186 (70, 215) 36 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Collin County Urban Yes 99.7 (96.0, 103.6) 213 (192, 216) 549 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Comanche County Rural No 122.9 (92.7, 160.7) 164 (21, 219) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.1)
Hardeman County Rural Yes 121.9 (69.7, 204.3) 170 (2, 220) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.1, 1.7)
Galveston County Urban No 131.2 (124.4, 138.3) 138 (88, 172) 288 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 102.9 (85.5, 123.7) 208 (113, 219) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 121.9 (116.7, 127.2) 171 (125, 189) 439 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Brazos County Urban Yes 111.8 (102.5, 121.7) 195 (132, 212) 108 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Chambers County Urban No 129.1 (109.2, 151.6) 146 (38, 212) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.1)
Hardin County Urban No 138.3 (122.1, 156.2) 113 (32, 194) 55 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Harris County Urban Yes 118.9 (116.8, 120.9) 181 (151, 186) 2,770 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Harrison County Urban No 123.6 (109.5, 139.1) 161 (75, 209) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Houston County Rural No 129.8 (106.5, 157.8) 141 (27, 213) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Red River County Rural No 168.1 (132.5, 212.2) 27 (2, 190) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Wilbarger County Rural No 123.8 (92.6, 163.1) 160 (18, 220) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.6)
Austin County Urban Yes 106.0 (87.4, 127.8) 204 (96, 220) 25 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Brazoria County Urban No 128.2 (121.1, 135.5) 149 (97, 179) 255 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Dallas County Urban No 126.0 (123.2, 128.8) 154 (124, 169) 1,643 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 102.7 (98.3, 107.2) 209 (186, 214) 438 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.0)
Goliad County Urban Yes 107.1 (72.1, 156.6) 201 (22, 220) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.0, 1.6)
Jackson County Rural Yes 120.2 (92.8, 154.0) 177 (24, 218) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Jefferson County Urban No 128.0 (120.1, 136.3) 151 (93, 185) 204 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Kerr County Rural Yes 120.9 (106.9, 136.7) 173 (76, 210) 66 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
McLennan County Urban No 132.3 (124.3, 140.6) 131 (77, 172) 217 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Potter County Urban No 138.6 (125.9, 152.3) 109 (49, 180) 92 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Robertson County Urban No 142.6 (114.5, 176.4) 96 (12, 211) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Smith County Urban Yes 122.5 (114.9, 130.5) 167 (109, 193) 201 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Bastrop County Urban No 130.2 (117.2, 144.2) 140 (63, 194) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Brewster County Rural Yes 91.1 (60.5, 133.6) 215 (49, 220) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Navarro County Rural No 146.1 (128.1, 166.0) 89 (18, 183) 50 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Nueces County Urban Yes 115.7 (109.3, 122.4) 193 (141, 201) 257 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Rockwall County Urban Yes 120.5 (108.3, 133.7) 174 (97, 206) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.2)
Williamson County Urban Yes 106.0 (101.2, 111.1) 203 (179, 212) 364 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Burnet County Rural Yes 120.2 (105.5, 136.8) 176 (80, 211) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Ellis County Urban No 138.7 (128.9, 149.1) 107 (59, 162) 152 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Erath County Rural Yes 110.5 (92.6, 130.9) 199 (89, 218) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.1)
Falls County Urban No 142.1 (113.6, 176.2) 97 (11, 212) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.1)
La Salle County Rural Yes 106.5 (66.0, 165.9) 202 (11, 220) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.4, 3.1)
Tarrant County Urban No 125.4 (122.4, 128.4) 156 (126, 172) 1,395 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Wharton County Rural Yes 122.4 (104.7, 142.5) 168 (51, 214) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Bailey County Rural Yes 111.4 (68.4, 171.9) 198 (7, 220) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.5)
Camp County Rural No 139.9 (105.6, 182.6) 103 (7, 217) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Lavaca County Rural No 139.3 (115.0, 168.1) 105 (15, 207) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 131.0 (99.7, 172.5) 139 (11, 218) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.7)
Young County Rural No 174.0 (143.4, 210.0) 17 (2, 159) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 134.6 (117.6, 153.5) 123 (38, 202) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Grimes County Rural No 138.9 (116.0, 165.5) 106 (17, 208) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Matagorda County Rural No 138.6 (118.1, 162.0) 108 (20, 201) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Randall County Urban No 122.8 (112.6, 133.8) 165 (96, 200) 110 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Scurry County Rural Yes 121.3 (93.5, 155.6) 172 (22, 219) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Taylor County Urban No 132.5 (121.6, 144.1) 130 (66, 183) 116 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Bexar County Urban Yes 118.3 (115.4, 121.3) 182 (148, 189) 1,297 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Dallam County Rural No 152.6 (98.2, 226.0) 67 (1, 220) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.6)
Hopkins County Rural No 133.0 (114.0, 154.6) 129 (37, 208) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Lubbock County Urban No 129.8 (122.1, 137.8) 142 (89, 177) 222 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Moore County Rural Yes 117.5 (88.8, 152.4) 184 (26, 219) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.7)
San Patricio County Urban No 136.5 (120.7, 153.7) 118 (42, 193) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Gregg County Urban No 147.3 (135.4, 159.9) 83 (37, 143) 120 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Hays County Urban Yes 115.8 (107.1, 125.0) 191 (126, 205) 139 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.1)
Lampasas County Urban No 149.3 (123.9, 179.2) 79 (9, 198) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Reeves County Rural No 131.3 (94.3, 178.5) 137 (8, 219) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.1)
Refugio County Rural No 136.6 (98.3, 189.0) 117 (6, 219) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.1)
Van Zandt County Rural No 147.2 (131.3, 164.7) 84 (25, 172) 68 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Waller County Urban No 140.6 (120.9, 162.6) 101 (23, 200) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.0)
Colorado County Rural No 146.1 (119.8, 177.3) 88 (9, 205) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Howard County Rural No 134.4 (110.8, 161.7) 125 (17, 212) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Liberty County Urban No 165.6 (149.3, 183.1) 35 (10, 120) 79 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Milam County Rural No 141.9 (119.2, 168.3) 98 (16, 203) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Montague County Rural No 141.5 (116.9, 170.7) 100 (16, 209) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Parker County Urban No 143.0 (132.3, 154.3) 94 (44, 156) 139 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Sabine County Rural No 125.9 (96.5, 164.9) 155 (12, 218) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Victoria County Urban No 134.9 (121.7, 149.1) 122 (52, 190) 81 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Castro County Rural No 139.3 (91.6, 203.5) 104 (3, 220) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.9)
Comal County Urban Yes 119.7 (110.9, 129.1) 179 (114, 201) 144 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Cooke County Rural No 144.8 (125.8, 166.1) 91 (21, 189) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Fayette County Rural Yes 120.0 (99.4, 144.5) 178 (53, 216) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Grayson County Urban No 146.7 (136.0, 158.2) 85 (38, 146) 146 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Henderson County Rural No 162.1 (148.2, 177.1) 44 (14, 110) 110 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Hood County Rural Yes 118.9 (105.7, 133.5) 180 (88, 211) 68 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 5.7)
Johnson County Urban No 145.1 (135.0, 155.8) 90 (40, 141) 156 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lamb County Rural No 128.8 (97.5, 168.0) 147 (15, 218) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Medina County Urban No 125.0 (108.5, 143.5) 158 (50, 211) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Nolan County Rural No 150.0 (118.1, 188.7) 78 (6, 211) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Starr County Rural Yes 103.7 (88.5, 120.8) 207 (110, 219) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Tom Green County Urban No 128.6 (117.3, 140.7) 148 (73, 192) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Willacy County Rural Yes 89.9 (66.9, 118.7) 217 (116, 220) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Wilson County Urban No 123.3 (106.6, 142.1) 162 (65, 213) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Duval County Rural No 154.2 (111.8, 208.2) 62 (2, 215) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Gonzales County Rural No 138.3 (110.8, 171.1) 112 (13, 212) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Morris County Rural No 165.6 (131.0, 208.0) 34 (3, 196) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Newton County Rural No 165.1 (126.4, 212.9) 38 (1, 213) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Orange County Urban No 156.5 (141.8, 172.4) 59 (15, 132) 86 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Terry County Rural Yes 122.5 (86.9, 168.4) 166 (11, 220) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 1.8)
Wichita County Urban No 164.8 (152.0, 178.3) 40 (14, 97) 132 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Childress County Rural No 166.3 (114.7, 236.2) 33 (1, 218) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.0)
Coryell County Urban No 157.6 (140.4, 176.3) 55 (15, 148) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Hunt County Urban No 154.1 (140.7, 168.4) 63 (23, 129) 102 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Leon County Rural No 152.0 (123.6, 186.4) 73 (6, 205) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Madison County Rural No 152.5 (113.2, 201.2) 70 (2, 214) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
San Saba County Rural No 152.1 (103.4, 220.7) 72 (1, 218) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.4)
Somervell County Rural Yes 115.9 (81.9, 160.9) 190 (16, 220) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.9)
Callahan County Urban No 153.3 (120.6, 193.3) 64 (6, 206) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Cameron County Urban Yes 111.5 (105.5, 117.7) 197 (156, 207) 268 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Delta County Rural Yes 108.2 (69.8, 164.8) 200 (16, 220) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 3.9)
Guadalupe County Urban No 126.1 (116.6, 136.1) 153 (94, 194) 133 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Jones County Urban No 153.0 (118.8, 194.7) 66 (4, 211) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.3)
Lamar County Rural No 165.0 (146.5, 185.4) 39 (9, 119) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Llano County Rural No 131.5 (109.3, 158.3) 134 (23, 211) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Presidio County Rural Yes 78.9 (42.1, 135.9) 219 (26, 220) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.8)
Baylor County Rural No 193.6 (125.1, 292.8) 9 (1, 216) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.5)
Blanco County Rural No 134.5 (104.5, 173.1) 124 (12, 217) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Bosque County Urban No 172.3 (143.5, 206.3) 18 (3, 152) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Carson County Urban No 168.9 (116.9, 239.3) 24 (1, 217) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.8)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 157.1 (139.5, 176.3) 56 (14, 146) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
San Augustine County Rural No 142.8 (105.7, 192.3) 95 (3, 217) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Tyler County Rural No 146.5 (119.5, 178.9) 87 (9, 204) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Ector County Urban No 169.3 (155.7, 183.8) 23 (11, 88) 117 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Maverick County Urban Yes 111.8 (95.0, 130.7) 196 (97, 217) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Midland County Urban No 123.0 (112.3, 134.5) 163 (93, 203) 100 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.1, 4.9)
San Jacinto County Urban No 140.2 (117.3, 166.8) 102 (18, 206) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Washington County Rural No 126.2 (108.0, 147.0) 152 (50, 211) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Wise County Urban No 152.5 (136.2, 170.4) 68 (17, 151) 66 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Andrews County Rural No 165.1 (127.0, 210.7) 36 (2, 204) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Cass County Rural No 154.4 (132.2, 179.8) 61 (10, 180) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
DeWitt County Rural No 153.0 (125.1, 186.1) 65 (8, 200) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Gray County Rural No 155.0 (125.4, 189.9) 60 (7, 194) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.9)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 99.8 (95.6, 104.1) 212 (191, 217) 430 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 2.1)
Hill County Rural No 160.2 (139.2, 183.9) 48 (10, 161) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Jack County Rural No 141.6 (98.8, 198.4) 99 (4, 219) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.7)
Swisher County Rural No 182.5 (129.2, 252.2) 12 (1, 215) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.3)
Calhoun County Rural No 159.6 (130.6, 193.7) 50 (5, 191) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Live Oak County Rural No 138.5 (101.5, 186.1) 110 (6, 219) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.4)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 171.7 (146.4, 200.4) 21 (5, 137) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Val Verde County Rural No 131.4 (112.4, 152.7) 135 (28, 208) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.7)
Donley County Rural No 151.8 (86.9, 252.0) 75 (1, 220) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.1)
Fannin County Rural No 159.0 (137.2, 183.7) 54 (9, 163) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Hale County Rural No 131.6 (109.2, 157.5) 132 (24, 214) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Jasper County Rural No 163.5 (140.9, 189.2) 43 (7, 159) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Shelby County Rural No 167.7 (140.7, 198.9) 30 (5, 153) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Clay County Urban No 143.2 (107.1, 189.3) 93 (6, 216) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 182.0 (116.2, 272.7) 13 (1, 219) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Lee County Rural No 123.9 (97.3, 156.4) 159 (22, 217) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Trinity County Rural No 169.4 (138.9, 206.6) 22 (3, 171) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Webb County Urban Yes 114.7 (106.2, 123.6) 194 (131, 207) 138 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.2)
Burleson County Urban No 161.5 (131.5, 197.0) 46 (5, 188) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Crosby County Urban Yes 105.5 (62.8, 169.3) 205 (10, 220) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.7)
Dawson County Rural No 125.1 (90.5, 169.6) 157 (11, 220) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.0)
Hall County Rural No 138.2 (81.7, 231.3) 114 (1, 220) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.5)
Mills County Rural No 150.5 (96.5, 230.6) 76 (1, 220) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.4)
Uvalde County Rural No 159.3 (132.3, 190.5) 51 (5, 188) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 146.7 (113.6, 186.4) 86 (6, 214) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Haskell County Rural No 179.8 (121.8, 259.5) 15 (1, 215) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.4)
Karnes County Rural No 128.1 (94.6, 170.4) 150 (11, 219) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Ochiltree County Rural No 129.6 (88.2, 183.7) 143 (5, 220) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 3.7)
Ward County Rural No 160.0 (117.9, 212.6) 49 (2, 215) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Wood County Rural No 156.7 (139.1, 176.4) 57 (14, 142) 68 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Hockley County Urban No 161.7 (131.5, 197.0) 45 (5, 191) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2)
Kleberg County Rural No 168.2 (140.8, 199.5) 26 (4, 170) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Panola County Rural No 168.3 (140.9, 200.0) 25 (5, 163) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.2)
Rusk County Urban No 160.7 (141.8, 181.7) 47 (10, 139) 54 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Fisher County Rural No 189.1 (122.9, 284.5) 11 (1, 217) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.6)
Freestone County Rural No 192.8 (160.3, 230.5) 10 (1, 110) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 171.9 (130.2, 225.4) 19 (1, 204) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.7)
Hansford County Rural No 164.5 (108.4, 241.8) 41 (1, 219) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.2)
Runnels County Rural No 152.5 (115.4, 199.6) 69 (3, 215) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.8)
Upshur County Urban No 171.7 (150.6, 195.2) 20 (6, 115) 50 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 8.5)
Eastland County Rural No 156.6 (126.6, 192.3) 58 (5, 202) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.7)
Frio County Rural No 163.7 (125.9, 209.4) 42 (2, 207) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.9)
Garza County Urban No 180.3 (113.2, 275.8) 14 (1, 220) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.4)
Kaufman County Urban No 152.3 (139.7, 165.6) 71 (24, 135) 114 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 3.1)
Bee County Rural No 134.1 (107.9, 164.9) 128 (18, 215) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
El Paso County Urban Yes 117.0 (112.7, 121.5) 187 (146, 196) 562 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 3.9)
Mason County Rural No 165.1 (101.9, 259.7) 37 (1, 220) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
McCulloch County Rural No 159.2 (115.5, 216.5) 53 (1, 216) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Bowie County Urban No 167.9 (153.6, 183.2) 29 (11, 94) 107 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 7.3)
Floyd County Rural No 174.4 (117.1, 252.0) 16 (1, 218) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.0)
Real County Rural No 222.2 (146.6, 336.5) 1 (1, 211) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.2)
Mitchell County Rural No 167.9 (117.5, 234.2) 28 (1, 215) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.6)
Coleman County Rural No 212.6 (165.4, 272.4) 4 (1, 157) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.1)
Jim Wells County Rural No 148.2 (126.9, 172.1) 82 (14, 188) 36 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 6.4)
Lynn County Urban No 136.4 (86.9, 205.9) 119 (2, 220) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.7)
Zavala County Rural No 196.4 (144.9, 260.4) 8 (1, 187) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.3)
Dimmit County Rural No 131.5 (91.2, 184.4) 133 (6, 220) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.7)
Franklin County Rural No 151.8 (115.0, 198.3) 74 (3, 213) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.7, 15.8)
Wheeler County Rural No 150.5 (99.0, 223.4) 77 (1, 220) 5 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.2)
Kinney County Rural No 166.4 (89.5, 289.7) 32 (1, 220) 3 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.7, 7.7)
Anderson County Rural No 135.0 (117.3, 154.9) 121 (32, 199) 44 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.9, 13.5)
Polk County Rural No 220.8 (194.7, 249.5) 3 (1, 26) 63 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.7, 13.0)
Yoakum County Rural No 166.7 (113.4, 236.6) 31 (1, 218) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.5, 25.1)
Brooks County Rural No 220.9 (159.7, 299.0) 2 (1, 165) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.9, 7.5)
Walker County Rural Yes 116.7 (101.5, 133.7) 188 (86, 214) 45 stable stable trend 6.2 (-2.1, 13.1)
Angelina County Rural No 137.4 (123.7, 152.2) 116 (47, 185) 77 stable stable trend 7.4 (-2.3, 14.4)
Atascosa County Urban No 138.0 (119.4, 158.8) 115 (28, 198) 40 rising rising trend 9.1 (0.4, 15.1)
Pecos County Rural No 159.2 (119.6, 208.0) 52 (2, 212) 11 rising rising trend 9.4 (1.5, 31.6)
Archer County Urban Yes 89.9 (61.5, 129.8) 216 (51, 220) 6
*
*
Coke County Rural No 207.5 (130.8, 318.1) 6 (1, 215) 5
*
*
Concho County Rural No 144.5 (79.8, 255.3) 92 (1, 220) 3
*
*
Crane County Rural No 131.3 (73.7, 216.2) 136 (1, 220) 3
*
*
Crockett County Rural No 199.8 (122.7, 313.1) 7 (1, 219) 4
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural Yes 120.3 (67.4, 345.5) 175 (1, 220) 3
*
*
Knox County Rural Yes 116.4 (61.9, 204.5) 189 (2, 220) 3
*
*
Martin County Urban No 210.3 (135.4, 311.7) 5 (1, 217) 5
*
*
Parmer County Rural Yes 117.3 (80.1, 166.4) 185 (12, 220) 6
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 1:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top