Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 175.0 (172.6, 177.4) N/A 4,337 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.5)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Adams County Rural No 176.4 (151.2, 205.9) 46 (8, 75) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Alcorn County Rural No 166.5 (149.0, 185.6) 60 (23, 73) 69 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Amite County Rural Yes 119.3 (95.2, 149.7) 80 (56, 80) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.6)
Attala County Rural No 196.2 (166.3, 231.0) 23 (3, 69) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Benton County Urban No 195.9 (150.1, 252.9) 24 (1, 79) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.2)
Bolivar County Rural No 177.1 (147.5, 211.6) 45 (6, 76) 27 falling falling trend -9.1 (-15.5, -1.4)
Calhoun County Rural No 150.7 (121.6, 185.7) 68 (19, 80) 20 falling falling trend -7.3 (-21.5, -2.7)
Carroll County Rural No 177.1 (141.9, 220.5) 44 (4, 79) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Chickasaw County Rural No 179.4 (148.3, 216.1) 41 (6, 76) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Choctaw County Rural No 138.7 (106.8, 179.2) 76 (21, 80) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Claiborne County Rural No 142.2 (80.7, 288.6) 73 (1, 80) 3 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 3.9)
Clarke County Rural No 143.6 (118.6, 173.4) 71 (28, 80) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Clay County Rural No 157.4 (126.3, 195.5) 63 (11, 80) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Coahoma County Rural No 191.4 (150.8, 243.6) 29 (2, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.4)
Copiah County Urban No 150.3 (127.0, 177.6) 69 (28, 80) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Covington County Rural No 196.3 (166.5, 230.4) 22 (3, 68) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
DeSoto County Urban No 182.5 (172.7, 192.9) 37 (20, 57) 265 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Forrest County Urban No 184.1 (168.3, 201.1) 35 (11, 63) 104 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Franklin County Rural No 137.8 (104.4, 180.9) 77 (23, 80) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
George County Rural No 220.8 (193.0, 251.6) 8 (1, 47) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Greene County Rural No 154.2 (125.5, 188.1) 65 (16, 80) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Grenada County Rural No 207.7 (178.7, 240.9) 13 (1, 62) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Hancock County Urban No 176.0 (161.0, 192.2) 47 (17, 67) 112 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 192.4 (183.5, 201.8) 27 (13, 45) 368 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Hinds County Urban No 153.6 (142.0, 166.1) 66 (47, 76) 143 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Holmes County Urban No 264.9 (195.1, 357.2) 2 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 2.5)
Humphreys County Rural No 212.1 (139.7, 320.1) 12 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 0.5)
Itawamba County Rural No 184.5 (162.8, 208.6) 34 (8, 69) 54 stable stable trend 5.9 (-1.4, 11.5)
Jackson County Urban No 184.0 (173.7, 194.7) 36 (17, 56) 254 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jasper County Rural No 195.7 (158.8, 239.7) 25 (2, 74) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 141.4 (105.4, 189.3) 74 (13, 80) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.3, -0.2)
Jones County Rural No 170.1 (155.8, 185.6) 55 (24, 70) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Kemper County Rural No 182.4 (125.5, 259.8) 38 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.4)
Lafayette County Rural No 142.8 (126.8, 160.3) 72 (49, 80) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Lamar County Urban No 139.0 (126.0, 153.1) 75 (57, 80) 86 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Lauderdale County Rural No 151.1 (137.1, 166.3) 67 (45, 78) 92 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.8, 5.8)
Lawrence County Rural No 204.0 (167.0, 247.7) 14 (1, 71) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.7)
Leake County Rural No 162.2 (135.6, 193.5) 61 (14, 79) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5)
Lee County Rural No 200.4 (186.1, 215.6) 17 (6, 46) 150 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -1.1)
Leflore County Rural No 228.9 (188.7, 276.9) 5 (1, 59) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 172.5 (152.7, 194.4) 50 (14, 74) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Lowndes County Rural No 191.4 (172.8, 211.7) 28 (7, 59) 84 falling falling trend -7.0 (-12.9, -0.2)
Madison County Urban No 169.1 (156.7, 182.4) 59 (28, 69) 143 falling falling trend -12.0 (-17.6, -5.5)
Marion County Rural No 185.3 (160.8, 212.7) 33 (7, 69) 44 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Marshall County Urban No 241.2 (214.6, 270.7) 4 (1, 24) 64 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Monroe County Rural No 177.7 (158.1, 199.4) 43 (14, 70) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 156.2 (120.7, 201.1) 64 (9, 80) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Neshoba County Rural No 173.9 (151.3, 199.3) 49 (12, 75) 45 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Newton County Rural No 170.9 (144.8, 200.9) 53 (11, 77) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Noxubee County Rural No 136.4 (91.7, 200.3) 78 (7, 80) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.1)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 143.9 (123.9, 166.2) 70 (41, 80) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Panola County Rural No 202.7 (178.7, 229.8) 15 (3, 57) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Pearl River County Rural No 202.0 (186.6, 218.4) 16 (6, 44) 137 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Perry County Urban No 188.6 (155.5, 227.3) 30 (3, 74) 24 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Pike County Rural No 174.5 (152.7, 199.0) 48 (12, 73) 49 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Pontotoc County Rural No 222.1 (198.4, 248.1) 6 (1, 37) 66 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.5)
Prentiss County Rural No 187.5 (165.4, 212.1) 31 (7, 67) 54 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Quitman County Rural No 256.5 (170.8, 379.2) 3 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.2)
Rankin County Urban No 125.9 (118.2, 134.1) 79 (71, 80) 204 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -1.3)
Scott County Urban No 179.4 (153.8, 208.6) 42 (8, 73) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Sharkey County Rural No 199.3 (108.7, 359.0) 18 (1, 80) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 2.8)
Simpson County Urban No 170.1 (146.6, 196.7) 56 (13, 77) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Smith County Rural No 160.4 (133.9, 191.3) 62 (15, 80) 27 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.1)
Stone County Urban No 197.7 (168.5, 230.8) 20 (3, 67) 36 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Sunflower County Rural No 198.7 (160.6, 244.9) 19 (1, 75) 19 falling falling trend -4.4 (-16.2, -0.4)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 182.3 (141.5, 233.8) 39 (2, 79) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Tate County Urban No 212.5 (186.9, 240.9) 11 (2, 49) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Tippah County Rural No 169.2 (145.9, 195.6) 58 (13, 76) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Tishomingo County Rural No 214.5 (189.9, 241.9) 9 (2, 49) 57 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Tunica County Urban No 265.2 (182.0, 379.6) 1 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Union County Rural No 193.7 (171.7, 218.0) 26 (5, 62) 58 falling falling trend -7.6 (-13.1, -0.4)
Walthall County Rural No 169.6 (138.6, 206.9) 57 (8, 79) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Warren County Rural No 170.9 (151.2, 192.8) 54 (17, 74) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Washington County Rural No 182.0 (154.0, 214.5) 40 (6, 75) 34 falling falling trend -4.4 (-10.4, -1.7)
Wayne County Rural No 185.9 (157.0, 219.1) 32 (4, 73) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Webster County Rural No 197.5 (161.2, 240.2) 21 (2, 74) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Wilkinson County Rural No 171.7 (119.8, 245.6) 51 (2, 80) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.1)
Winston County Rural No 171.2 (141.6, 206.4) 52 (8, 79) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 7.0)
Yalobusha County Rural No 213.9 (178.0, 256.4) 10 (1, 63) 27 rising rising trend 10.2 (1.5, 16.3)
Yazoo County Urban No 221.2 (188.1, 259.3) 7 (1, 52) 33 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.2)
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 8:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top