Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 155.4 (154.4, 156.4) N/A 18,030 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Williamson County Rural No 163.9 (152.1, 176.4) 68 (25, 91) 150 falling falling trend -2.8 (-7.0, -1.6)
Winnebago County Urban No 165.7 (159.2, 172.4) 66 (36, 83) 527 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -1.3)
Cook County Urban No 142.4 (140.6, 144.3) 97 (85, 99) 4,704 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.9)
Johnson County Rural No 148.8 (124.7, 177.2) 90 (19, 102) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Putnam County Rural No 169.5 (132.3, 216.4) 60 (2, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Bureau County Rural No 162.7 (147.1, 179.9) 71 (18, 98) 85 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Calhoun County Urban No 179.0 (138.0, 231.5) 31 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
DuPage County Urban No 138.0 (134.5, 141.6) 99 (89, 102) 1,261 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Hancock County Rural No 137.1 (118.5, 158.4) 101 (52, 102) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.7)
Kendall County Urban No 143.1 (132.2, 154.6) 95 (70, 102) 133 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Lake County Urban No 142.9 (138.6, 147.2) 96 (83, 101) 908 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Coles County Rural No 161.2 (146.8, 176.8) 73 (22, 99) 97 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Kane County Urban No 143.8 (138.8, 149.0) 93 (80, 100) 642 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Monroe County Urban No 140.1 (125.1, 156.6) 98 (58, 102) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Bond County Urban No 177.6 (152.2, 206.4) 35 (3, 100) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Brown County Rural No 149.8 (110.7, 199.7) 89 (3, 102) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 0.9)
Clinton County Urban No 143.4 (128.3, 160.0) 94 (53, 102) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 143.9 (126.9, 163.2) 92 (39, 102) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Edwards County Rural No 184.9 (146.7, 231.5) 24 (1, 102) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Grundy County Urban No 180.0 (164.4, 196.9) 29 (7, 83) 100 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Lee County Rural No 174.9 (158.2, 193.2) 42 (8, 87) 85 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Macon County Urban No 173.2 (162.9, 184.1) 49 (18, 80) 230 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.0, -1.0)
Sangamon County Urban No 157.5 (150.4, 165.0) 80 (51, 90) 382 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
St. Clair County Urban No 157.8 (150.4, 165.5) 79 (49, 90) 359 stable stable trend -1.3 (-1.7, 0.3)
White County Rural No 170.7 (146.1, 199.0) 58 (4, 101) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.7, -0.1)
Will County Urban No 160.4 (155.7, 165.3) 75 (53, 85) 914 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Adams County Rural No 164.7 (152.9, 177.3) 67 (26, 91) 154 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Christian County Rural No 175.6 (158.8, 193.9) 39 (8, 88) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Henderson County Rural No 155.4 (124.7, 193.8) 83 (4, 102) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.4)
Marshall County Urban No 150.4 (125.4, 179.7) 87 (16, 102) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Schuyler County Rural No 135.4 (104.7, 174.0) 102 (19, 102) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Washington County Rural No 147.9 (124.2, 175.5) 91 (18, 102) 30 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Cass County Rural No 178.9 (148.2, 215.0) 32 (2, 100) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Champaign County Urban No 137.8 (129.8, 146.2) 100 (82, 102) 235 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.6, 3.9)
Franklin County Rural No 207.9 (190.6, 226.6) 4 (1, 34) 113 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Henry County Urban No 166.2 (152.7, 180.8) 64 (20, 90) 119 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
McLean County Urban No 150.4 (142.0, 159.2) 86 (62, 99) 249 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Menard County Urban No 158.1 (132.2, 188.2) 78 (8, 102) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Montgomery County Rural No 177.6 (159.6, 197.4) 34 (5, 90) 75 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Perry County Rural No 178.2 (155.8, 203.3) 33 (4, 94) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Boone County Urban No 152.5 (138.2, 168.1) 85 (37, 102) 88 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Madison County Urban No 170.8 (164.4, 177.5) 57 (29, 73) 554 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Saline County Rural No 185.5 (165.5, 207.7) 23 (2, 85) 64 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Tazewell County Urban No 167.5 (159.0, 176.4) 63 (28, 82) 306 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Wabash County Rural No 177.4 (148.7, 210.7) 37 (2, 101) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 186.2 (162.3, 213.5) 22 (2, 87) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Effingham County Rural No 160.8 (144.4, 178.7) 74 (19, 100) 74 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Gallatin County Rural No 174.8 (135.1, 225.1) 45 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.3)
Kankakee County Urban No 172.5 (161.7, 183.8) 52 (19, 80) 201 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 1.2)
McDonough County Rural No 157.5 (138.3, 178.8) 81 (15, 102) 54 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Morgan County Rural No 177.4 (160.3, 196.2) 36 (6, 86) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Peoria County Urban No 173.2 (164.8, 182.0) 50 (22, 75) 338 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Richland County Rural No 173.9 (150.2, 200.8) 46 (4, 100) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.8, -0.2)
Cumberland County Rural No 156.7 (128.8, 189.5) 82 (6, 102) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Douglas County Rural No 173.8 (150.8, 199.6) 47 (4, 98) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Hamilton County Rural No 172.0 (140.4, 209.8) 53 (2, 102) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 163.0 (147.5, 179.8) 70 (18, 99) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Wayne County Rural No 159.6 (137.8, 184.4) 77 (14, 102) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
La Salle County Rural No 187.0 (177.0, 197.6) 19 (7, 53) 277 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 174.8 (149.3, 204.1) 44 (2, 101) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 173.6 (155.9, 193.0) 48 (7, 92) 76 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Warren County Rural No 191.5 (165.1, 221.5) 13 (1, 87) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Whiteside County Rural No 174.9 (161.8, 189.0) 43 (11, 83) 139 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Clay County Rural No 186.8 (159.4, 218.0) 20 (2, 92) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 0.9)
Fayette County Rural No 168.1 (147.4, 191.3) 62 (7, 99) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Greene County Rural No 201.0 (172.4, 233.7) 7 (1, 82) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Livingston County Rural No 166.0 (149.8, 183.7) 65 (15, 96) 82 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
McHenry County Urban No 160.0 (153.8, 166.4) 76 (48, 88) 537 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 1.6)
Ogle County Rural No 171.2 (157.2, 186.2) 56 (13, 88) 118 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Piatt County Urban No 152.7 (131.1, 177.2) 84 (18, 102) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Pope County Rural No 169.7 (125.6, 231.0) 59 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4)
Rock Island County Urban No 163.4 (154.7, 172.5) 69 (33, 87) 289 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Shelby County Rural No 171.4 (152.3, 192.8) 55 (8, 97) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Stark County Urban No 171.9 (133.3, 220.2) 54 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 0.9)
Union County Rural No 184.8 (161.2, 211.5) 25 (2, 87) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Knox County Rural No 181.1 (166.8, 196.4) 27 (7, 75) 131 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Macoupin County Urban No 168.9 (154.8, 184.1) 61 (15, 90) 113 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Stephenson County Rural No 162.7 (148.3, 178.3) 72 (22, 99) 109 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Crawford County Rural No 179.7 (157.1, 205.1) 30 (3, 93) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Mason County Rural No 192.4 (166.3, 222.2) 11 (1, 86) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Massac County Urban No 188.2 (161.1, 219.3) 18 (2, 91) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Scott County Rural No 177.2 (135.4, 229.8) 38 (1, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Clark County Rural No 173.2 (148.9, 200.7) 51 (4, 100) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Woodford County Urban No 149.9 (135.0, 166.1) 88 (36, 102) 78 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Logan County Rural No 190.0 (170.6, 211.2) 15 (3, 75) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
DeKalb County Urban No 175.4 (163.3, 188.2) 40 (14, 81) 162 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 2.0)
Iroquois County Rural No 189.3 (170.3, 210.2) 17 (3, 73) 78 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Jersey County Urban No 184.7 (163.7, 208.1) 26 (2, 86) 58 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Pike County Rural No 196.6 (170.9, 225.6) 10 (1, 79) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Vermilion County Rural No 205.7 (192.5, 219.7) 5 (1, 29) 195 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Alexander County Urban No 259.0 (202.2, 331.2) 1 (1, 69) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.3)
Ford County Urban No 186.5 (159.7, 217.1) 21 (2, 95) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Fulton County Rural No 205.3 (187.3, 224.8) 6 (1, 41) 101 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Marion County Rural No 199.9 (182.6, 218.6) 8 (1, 49) 104 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Moultrie County Rural No 190.3 (163.0, 221.2) 14 (1, 89) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Mercer County Urban No 180.4 (156.6, 207.5) 28 (2, 93) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Hardin County Rural No 233.9 (178.3, 304.8) 2 (1, 92) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Pulaski County Rural No 215.6 (163.5, 282.8) 3 (1, 99) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 189.6 (172.3, 208.4) 16 (3, 73) 93 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 7.4)
Edgar County Rural No 192.0 (168.6, 218.2) 12 (2, 81) 53 stable stable trend 6.0 (-1.4, 15.3)
De Witt County Rural No 198.7 (172.7, 227.9) 9 (1, 79) 44 stable stable trend 7.5 (-1.4, 14.0)
Jasper County Rural No 174.9 (145.0, 210.2) 41 (2, 102) 25 stable stable trend 11.2 (-0.4, 20.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 1:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top