Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa N/A No 150.4 (148.7, 152.2) N/A 6,033 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Ringgold County Rural No 187.2 (145.1, 240.1) 5 (1, 94) 14 stable stable trend -18.3 (-38.2, 1.4)
Taylor County Rural Yes 118.7 (90.0, 155.9) 95 (14, 99) 12 falling falling trend -6.4 (-30.6, -1.3)
Decatur County Rural No 152.4 (120.4, 191.5) 53 (2, 99) 16 falling falling trend -5.9 (-19.8, -1.5)
Clay County Rural Yes 118.4 (100.1, 139.8) 96 (53, 99) 31 falling falling trend -4.7 (-14.0, -2.6)
Scott County Urban No 149.2 (141.6, 157.1) 58 (32, 81) 305 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.8, -1.6)
Dallas County Urban Yes 114.6 (105.1, 124.7) 97 (83, 99) 110 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.7)
Johnson County Urban Yes 113.4 (105.4, 121.9) 98 (86, 99) 154 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Cass County Rural No 168.7 (143.7, 197.6) 23 (1, 91) 36 stable stable trend -2.1 (-12.9, 0.2)
Wright County Rural No 135.2 (111.7, 163.3) 86 (12, 99) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.8)
Fayette County Rural No 141.5 (122.0, 163.6) 71 (17, 98) 43 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Hamilton County Rural No 135.1 (114.2, 159.6) 87 (19, 99) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Harrison County Urban No 162.1 (138.2, 189.6) 33 (2, 93) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.7)
Jones County Urban No 132.5 (114.5, 153.0) 91 (32, 99) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Monona County Rural No 145.1 (118.3, 177.5) 66 (5, 99) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Muscatine County Rural No 155.0 (139.6, 172.0) 48 (10, 87) 78 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
O'Brien County Rural No 148.0 (124.5, 175.3) 61 (4, 97) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Shelby County Rural No 136.6 (113.5, 164.0) 81 (12, 99) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Winneshiek County Rural Yes 120.9 (103.6, 140.6) 94 (52, 99) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Audubon County Rural No 148.2 (113.6, 192.1) 60 (1, 99) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.1)
Cedar County Rural No 135.3 (116.1, 157.3) 84 (23, 99) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Dubuque County Urban No 139.7 (130.7, 149.2) 74 (46, 91) 189 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Louisa County Rural No 173.5 (142.3, 210.5) 16 (1, 92) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.2)
Worth County Rural No 135.7 (106.9, 171.4) 83 (5, 99) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 138.2 (120.3, 158.4) 78 (21, 98) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Crawford County Rural No 148.6 (123.7, 178.2) 59 (4, 98) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Linn County Urban No 140.0 (133.7, 146.5) 73 (52, 88) 387 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Page County Rural No 162.0 (139.8, 187.5) 34 (3, 88) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.9, -0.2)
Plymouth County Rural No 135.2 (118.2, 154.4) 85 (28, 99) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Sioux County Rural Yes 111.5 (97.4, 127.3) 99 (78, 99) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Dickinson County Rural No 136.2 (118.2, 157.0) 82 (21, 99) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Lee County Rural No 166.8 (150.6, 184.5) 25 (4, 70) 83 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 164.1 (148.0, 181.8) 29 (4, 76) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Sac County Rural No 138.2 (112.6, 169.0) 79 (8, 99) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Cerro Gordo County Rural No 151.6 (137.9, 166.4) 55 (16, 88) 103 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Hardin County Rural No 152.0 (131.3, 175.8) 54 (7, 95) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Humboldt County Rural No 134.9 (108.8, 166.4) 88 (9, 99) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Jasper County Urban No 152.7 (138.0, 168.8) 52 (13, 88) 82 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Polk County Urban No 157.3 (152.1, 162.5) 44 (26, 60) 740 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Story County Urban No 130.1 (119.4, 141.6) 92 (57, 97) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Warren County Urban No 138.4 (125.7, 152.1) 77 (37, 95) 89 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Webster County Rural No 160.6 (144.6, 178.0) 39 (6, 81) 81 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.5)
Kossuth County Rural No 126.1 (105.6, 150.2) 93 (30, 99) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.3)
Mills County Urban No 146.8 (122.7, 174.7) 64 (6, 98) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Union County Rural No 159.4 (132.7, 190.4) 42 (2, 97) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.5)
Adams County Rural No 142.8 (99.0, 202.0) 69 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.3)
Allamakee County Rural No 159.0 (133.9, 188.1) 43 (2, 94) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Black Hawk County Urban No 150.4 (141.5, 159.8) 56 (27, 79) 227 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Buena Vista County Rural No 138.7 (115.8, 166.0) 76 (12, 99) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Butler County Rural No 143.3 (121.3, 168.7) 68 (9, 98) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Delaware County Rural No 144.5 (124.4, 167.5) 67 (12, 98) 40 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Hancock County Rural No 137.5 (112.4, 167.5) 80 (9, 99) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 5.1)
Pottawattamie County Urban No 178.3 (167.4, 189.8) 10 (3, 39) 211 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Poweshiek County Rural No 138.9 (120.4, 160.2) 75 (23, 98) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Adair County Rural No 152.7 (122.2, 189.9) 51 (2, 99) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.5)
Guthrie County Urban No 147.3 (121.6, 177.8) 63 (4, 99) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Jackson County Rural No 156.5 (136.6, 178.9) 46 (6, 89) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Benton County Urban No 142.2 (124.9, 161.6) 70 (18, 97) 52 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Henry County Rural No 161.3 (140.8, 184.3) 37 (3, 88) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Osceola County Rural No 156.4 (122.1, 199.6) 47 (1, 99) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Clinton County Rural No 170.5 (156.4, 185.7) 17 (3, 61) 113 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Des Moines County Rural No 175.8 (160.0, 192.9) 14 (2, 56) 97 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Ida County Rural No 161.9 (130.6, 200.2) 35 (1, 98) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Iowa County Rural No 160.6 (138.0, 186.3) 38 (3, 91) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Keokuk County Rural No 147.7 (120.5, 180.1) 62 (3, 99) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Lucas County Rural No 163.3 (134.0, 198.3) 32 (1, 96) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Wayne County Rural No 160.5 (125.3, 203.8) 40 (1, 99) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Woodbury County Urban No 169.0 (157.8, 180.8) 22 (6, 56) 181 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Buchanan County Rural No 165.0 (143.5, 189.1) 27 (2, 87) 44 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Cherokee County Rural No 157.1 (131.4, 187.3) 45 (2, 96) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Calhoun County Rural No 153.9 (126.9, 186.1) 49 (3, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.8)
Clayton County Rural No 176.0 (153.6, 201.3) 13 (1, 72) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Jefferson County Rural No 141.3 (119.1, 167.3) 72 (10, 99) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Lyon County Rural No 133.4 (109.2, 161.9) 90 (16, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Pocahontas County Rural No 180.6 (146.4, 222.1) 8 (1, 90) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Wapello County Rural No 187.7 (169.8, 207.4) 4 (1, 45) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Appanoose County Rural No 163.4 (138.9, 191.7) 31 (2, 92) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Boone County Urban No 169.2 (150.3, 190.2) 21 (2, 78) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Grundy County Urban No 163.6 (138.1, 193.1) 30 (2, 93) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Marion County Rural No 169.2 (152.7, 187.3) 20 (3, 69) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Howard County Rural No 170.3 (140.4, 205.5) 19 (1, 92) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Monroe County Rural No 174.2 (140.4, 214.8) 15 (1, 93) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Tama County Rural No 164.3 (140.6, 191.4) 28 (1, 90) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Chickasaw County Rural No 170.4 (143.2, 202.0) 18 (1, 90) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Emmet County Rural No 184.0 (151.6, 222.4) 6 (1, 82) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Mahaska County Rural No 178.9 (157.5, 202.6) 9 (1, 66) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Mitchell County Rural No 153.5 (127.3, 184.2) 50 (3, 98) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Van Buren County Rural No 188.0 (152.4, 230.7) 3 (1, 90) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.1)
Clarke County Rural No 194.1 (160.1, 234.3) 2 (1, 70) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Floyd County Rural No 165.8 (142.6, 192.3) 26 (1, 88) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Greene County Rural No 178.0 (147.1, 214.6) 11 (1, 89) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Madison County Urban No 176.5 (151.5, 204.8) 12 (1, 79) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 161.8 (134.3, 194.3) 36 (1, 95) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Bremer County Urban No 134.8 (117.6, 154.1) 89 (31, 99) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 2.8)
Davis County Rural No 150.2 (118.6, 187.9) 57 (2, 99) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Washington County Urban No 146.3 (127.7, 167.2) 65 (13, 96) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Winnebago County Rural No 159.6 (132.4, 191.8) 41 (2, 96) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Franklin County Rural No 181.2 (150.3, 217.8) 7 (1, 84) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.4)
Fremont County Rural No 167.2 (132.7, 209.6) 24 (1, 97) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 8.4)
Palo Alto County Rural No 210.8 (175.8, 251.6) 1 (1, 52) 29 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.4, 14.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 11:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top