Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A No 183.8 (182.1, 185.5) N/A 9,479 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Robertson County Rural Yes 112.8 (71.3, 177.6) 120 (48, 120) 4 falling falling trend -13.6 (-40.7, -3.4)
Nicholas County Rural No 182.4 (145.3, 226.7) 84 (6, 120) 17 falling falling trend -5.3 (-19.0, -1.4)
Jackson County Rural No 178.2 (150.3, 210.2) 94 (15, 120) 31 stable stable trend -5.1 (-9.8, 1.5)
Shelby County Urban No 162.3 (146.9, 179.1) 113 (71, 120) 85 falling falling trend -4.0 (-10.6, -0.9)
Elliott County Rural No 183.0 (148.8, 224.2) 82 (10, 120) 20 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.1)
Casey County Rural No 202.2 (176.0, 231.6) 52 (8, 110) 45 falling falling trend -2.7 (-12.8, -0.8)
Rowan County Rural No 190.8 (167.2, 217.0) 71 (14, 115) 49 falling falling trend -2.7 (-10.6, -0.7)
Boone County Urban No 142.1 (133.3, 151.4) 119 (111, 120) 202 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Morgan County Rural No 211.4 (180.6, 246.5) 36 (2, 112) 36 stable stable trend -2.2 (-10.0, 0.0)
Meade County Urban No 175.6 (155.3, 198.0) 97 (35, 119) 58 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -1.3)
Franklin County Rural No 157.1 (143.2, 172.1) 116 (81, 120) 99 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Pike County Rural No 205.6 (191.3, 220.8) 44 (19, 87) 165 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.1, -1.0)
Oldham County Urban No 143.2 (130.4, 156.9) 118 (103, 120) 98 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Campbell County Urban No 164.9 (154.3, 176.2) 112 (79, 117) 189 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Bullitt County Urban No 157.6 (146.4, 169.4) 115 (89, 119) 156 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Fayette County Urban No 146.6 (140.2, 153.2) 117 (110, 120) 411 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Gallatin County Urban No 204.4 (164.6, 251.3) 48 (2, 119) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 160.9 (156.8, 165.1) 114 (100, 116) 1,221 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Kenton County Urban No 171.4 (162.8, 180.4) 102 (73, 114) 313 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Caldwell County Rural No 175.2 (148.5, 205.9) 99 (24, 119) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Greenup County Urban No 181.1 (165.0, 198.6) 91 (39, 115) 98 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Magoffin County Rural No 191.5 (160.6, 227.1) 70 (9, 119) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Boyd County Urban No 187.5 (172.9, 203.2) 75 (36, 108) 128 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Bracken County Urban No 181.2 (145.9, 223.2) 89 (7, 120) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Breckinridge County Rural No 189.4 (167.0, 214.3) 74 (19, 115) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
McLean County Urban No 181.1 (149.0, 219.0) 90 (12, 120) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Boyle County Rural No 167.4 (149.4, 187.2) 109 (57, 119) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Hancock County Rural No 180.2 (147.2, 219.2) 92 (13, 120) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Hopkins County Rural No 173.5 (158.3, 190.0) 100 (50, 117) 100 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Laurel County Rural No 198.7 (184.5, 213.9) 56 (24, 96) 151 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 185.1 (166.8, 205.1) 80 (28, 114) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Owen County Rural No 169.2 (141.1, 202.1) 106 (30, 120) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Trigg County Urban No 182.3 (156.5, 211.9) 85 (19, 119) 39 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Allen County Urban No 185.8 (163.2, 211.0) 79 (23, 116) 51 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Lyon County Rural No 172.9 (141.8, 210.6) 101 (17, 120) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Marion County Rural No 186.1 (161.4, 213.9) 76 (17, 118) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
McCreary County Rural No 236.3 (206.6, 269.5) 15 (1, 87) 48 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Warren County Urban No 175.3 (164.7, 186.4) 98 (65, 113) 212 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Floyd County Rural No 235.4 (215.6, 256.8) 17 (2, 52) 113 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jessamine County Urban No 166.1 (151.7, 181.5) 110 (68, 119) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Johnson County Rural No 204.5 (181.4, 230.1) 47 (9, 105) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Scott County Urban No 170.3 (153.9, 187.9) 103 (53, 118) 86 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2)
Anderson County Rural No 175.9 (154.4, 199.9) 96 (32, 119) 50 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Bourbon County Urban No 192.2 (169.0, 218.1) 68 (17, 114) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Lee County Rural No 244.5 (201.5, 295.1) 11 (1, 93) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.2)
Madison County Rural No 183.6 (171.3, 196.5) 81 (44, 109) 173 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.0, -0.1)
Metcalfe County Rural No 231.0 (196.6, 270.4) 19 (1, 93) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Ohio County Rural No 190.5 (169.1, 214.2) 72 (22, 114) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 206.8 (176.3, 241.7) 43 (4, 114) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Wayne County Rural No 181.2 (159.1, 206.0) 88 (26, 118) 52 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Breathitt County Rural No 214.6 (184.0, 249.4) 32 (2, 106) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Grant County Urban No 189.6 (166.0, 215.7) 73 (18, 116) 50 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Harlan County Rural No 235.5 (212.7, 260.3) 16 (1, 61) 83 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Larue County Urban No 181.4 (153.7, 213.1) 87 (19, 119) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Letcher County Rural No 208.7 (185.5, 234.4) 40 (7, 98) 64 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Logan County Rural No 194.4 (173.8, 217.1) 65 (18, 111) 67 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Mason County Rural No 196.6 (170.2, 226.4) 60 (11, 115) 42 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Mercer County Rural No 208.1 (185.0, 233.6) 42 (8, 101) 62 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Carter County Urban No 213.1 (192.2, 235.8) 33 (9, 89) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Edmonson County Urban No 182.8 (155.6, 214.3) 83 (15, 119) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 202.5 (180.5, 226.7) 50 (12, 105) 64 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Trimble County Rural No 169.6 (135.7, 210.1) 105 (16, 120) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Webster County Rural No 193.8 (163.0, 229.3) 67 (8, 118) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Ballard County Urban No 199.1 (163.3, 241.6) 55 (3, 118) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.0)
Clark County Urban No 178.7 (161.3, 197.5) 93 (40, 116) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Knott County Rural No 202.0 (173.8, 233.9) 53 (6, 114) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Lewis County Rural No 215.2 (185.1, 249.2) 29 (3, 104) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Menifee County Rural No 211.8 (170.8, 261.3) 34 (1, 117) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Powell County Rural No 248.3 (211.8, 289.6) 9 (1, 77) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Pulaski County Rural No 205.1 (191.7, 219.3) 46 (20, 84) 184 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Spencer County Urban No 166.0 (141.2, 194.1) 111 (34, 120) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.5)
Barren County Rural No 198.4 (181.8, 216.2) 58 (20, 100) 110 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Estill County Rural No 223.7 (193.5, 257.8) 21 (1, 96) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Martin County Rural No 210.3 (176.4, 249.4) 38 (2, 115) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Carroll County Rural No 209.2 (174.8, 249.0) 39 (2, 115) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Graves County Rural No 196.3 (178.3, 215.8) 61 (20, 104) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Hardin County Urban No 195.3 (183.4, 207.8) 64 (31, 95) 209 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 1.6)
Henderson County Rural No 186.0 (169.7, 203.6) 77 (32, 112) 102 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Henry County Urban No 210.7 (182.4, 242.6) 37 (4, 111) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Perry County Rural No 254.8 (231.1, 280.4) 6 (1, 34) 91 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Woodford County Urban No 168.7 (149.4, 190.1) 107 (50, 119) 59 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 3.4)
Adair County Rural No 194.1 (169.9, 221.1) 66 (15, 115) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Green County Rural No 202.3 (172.4, 236.7) 51 (6, 114) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Montgomery County Rural No 195.8 (174.7, 218.9) 63 (17, 110) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Rockcastle County Rural No 218.8 (191.4, 249.5) 25 (2, 98) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Russell County Rural No 217.2 (191.3, 245.9) 28 (4, 98) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Bell County Rural No 232.3 (209.0, 257.7) 18 (2, 68) 77 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Butler County Urban No 222.9 (190.8, 259.3) 23 (1, 100) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Leslie County Rural No 245.5 (209.7, 286.4) 10 (1, 80) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Marshall County Rural No 192.2 (174.7, 211.1) 69 (22, 107) 94 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Clay County Rural No 256.1 (227.5, 287.5) 5 (1, 42) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Crittenden County Rural No 205.5 (171.1, 245.7) 45 (3, 116) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Lawrence County Urban No 253.8 (222.8, 288.2) 7 (1, 57) 52 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Simpson County Rural No 195.9 (169.2, 225.8) 62 (11, 115) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Harrison County Rural No 197.1 (173.1, 223.9) 59 (12, 113) 50 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.3)
Owsley County Rural No 272.6 (212.6, 345.9) 1 (1, 94) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.5)
Wolfe County Rural No 242.6 (197.1, 296.4) 12 (1, 102) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Fulton County Rural No 237.0 (186.3, 299.0) 14 (1, 114) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Garrard County Rural No 186.0 (161.2, 213.9) 78 (18, 118) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.2)
Hart County Rural No 204.2 (177.9, 233.5) 49 (6, 111) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Whitley County Rural No 218.0 (198.3, 239.2) 26 (6, 79) 93 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Fleming County Rural No 208.6 (180.4, 240.4) 41 (5, 107) 41 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Pendleton County Urban No 215.1 (184.5, 249.6) 30 (2, 106) 38 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.3)
Calloway County Rural No 211.6 (192.2, 232.6) 35 (9, 89) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Taylor County Rural No 221.9 (198.6, 247.4) 24 (4, 83) 70 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Todd County Rural No 214.9 (180.6, 254.1) 31 (2, 112) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Grayson County Rural No 225.5 (202.8, 250.2) 20 (3, 77) 77 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Hickman County Rural No 176.8 (135.8, 230.1) 95 (8, 120) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.0)
Livingston County Urban No 223.7 (188.9, 264.2) 22 (1, 109) 31 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
McCracken County Urban No 168.3 (156.1, 181.3) 108 (71, 116) 149 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 4.5)
Clinton County Rural No 257.9 (219.8, 301.6) 4 (1, 67) 34 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Christian County Urban No 198.6 (181.6, 216.7) 57 (17, 100) 105 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 6.3)
Monroe County Rural No 240.4 (205.6, 280.1) 13 (1, 84) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Cumberland County Rural No 262.0 (216.8, 315.8) 2 (1, 71) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.0)
Knox County Rural No 251.6 (229.2, 275.7) 8 (1, 37) 96 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 4.4)
Carlisle County Urban No 259.0 (206.2, 322.8) 3 (1, 99) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Washington County Rural No 170.0 (141.6, 203.0) 104 (24, 120) 26 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 11.3)
Nelson County Urban No 201.1 (184.0, 219.4) 54 (18, 99) 108 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 8.1)
Daviess County Urban No 182.2 (171.5, 193.5) 86 (51, 108) 224 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.6, 8.9)
Bath County Rural No 217.3 (185.5, 253.3) 27 (2, 104) 35 stable stable trend 7.5 (-0.7, 12.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top