Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A No 134.4 (133.6, 135.2) N/A 23,202 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Westchester County Urban Yes 113.0 (109.9, 116.3) 60 (58, 60) 1,062 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.5, -2.5)
New York County Urban Yes 86.5 (84.1, 89.0) 62 (62, 62) 1,011 falling falling trend -4.2 (-4.8, -3.8)
Bronx County Urban No 130.4 (123.7, 137.5) 55 (45, 58) 336 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -3.2)
Kings County Urban Yes 103.4 (100.7, 106.1) 61 (60, 61) 1,216 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -3.1)
Queens County Urban Yes 117.0 (114.0, 120.2) 59 (56, 60) 1,213 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.9, -3.2)
Erie County Urban No 148.2 (144.9, 151.5) 40 (27, 45) 1,676 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.8)
Rockland County Urban Yes 117.3 (111.6, 123.1) 58 (55, 60) 341 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Monroe County Urban No 137.3 (133.7, 141.0) 52 (42, 55) 1,171 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -1.7)
Putnam County Urban No 133.6 (124.3, 143.7) 54 (35, 58) 160 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Suffolk County Urban No 136.7 (134.1, 139.3) 53 (45, 55) 2,249 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Ulster County Urban No 140.8 (134.0, 147.9) 49 (31, 55) 347 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Hamilton County Rural No 149.3 (117.3, 193.1) 38 (1, 61) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Nassau County Urban No 124.0 (121.3, 126.8) 57 (54, 58) 1,736 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Richmond County Urban No 142.5 (137.4, 147.7) 46 (33, 54) 628 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Sullivan County Rural No 153.5 (141.8, 166.0) 29 (8, 53) 139 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Columbia County Rural No 143.0 (132.2, 154.8) 45 (18, 56) 143 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Dutchess County Urban No 141.8 (136.0, 147.8) 47 (31, 54) 487 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Lewis County Rural No 150.5 (132.7, 170.1) 36 (5, 57) 56 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Livingston County Urban No 150.5 (138.5, 163.4) 35 (8, 54) 125 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Ontario County Urban No 140.8 (132.6, 149.4) 48 (28, 56) 234 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Rensselaer County Urban No 156.9 (148.9, 165.2) 25 (9, 44) 309 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Orange County Urban No 153.7 (147.7, 160.0) 28 (15, 44) 518 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 165.0 (155.4, 175.0) 12 (4, 34) 234 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Albany County Urban No 140.5 (134.8, 146.3) 50 (35, 55) 500 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Greene County Rural No 173.0 (159.4, 187.7) 7 (1, 33) 131 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Madison County Urban No 146.9 (135.8, 158.7) 42 (14, 55) 138 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Otsego County Rural No 149.7 (137.7, 162.6) 37 (10, 55) 128 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.8)
Saratoga County Urban No 145.4 (139.4, 151.7) 43 (26, 53) 462 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Tompkins County Urban No 125.2 (115.6, 135.5) 56 (47, 60) 133 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 152.8 (142.0, 164.3) 31 (9, 52) 162 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Chenango County Rural No 157.9 (144.6, 172.2) 22 (4, 50) 112 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Schoharie County Urban No 160.8 (144.4, 178.9) 18 (3, 53) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Warren County Urban No 154.3 (143.3, 166.0) 27 (8, 51) 160 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Cayuga County Rural No 143.4 (133.3, 154.1) 44 (20, 56) 159 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Cortland County Rural No 162.0 (147.1, 178.0) 16 (2, 49) 91 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Essex County Rural No 151.4 (137.8, 166.3) 33 (7, 55) 99 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 169.8 (159.3, 180.9) 9 (2, 30) 205 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Oswego County Urban No 167.8 (158.3, 177.8) 11 (3, 31) 248 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Schenectady County Urban No 146.9 (138.9, 155.4) 41 (19, 54) 268 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Seneca County Rural No 158.1 (141.6, 176.3) 21 (3, 54) 72 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Wyoming County Rural No 157.4 (142.5, 173.6) 24 (3, 53) 87 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Delaware County Rural No 152.7 (139.8, 166.7) 32 (7, 54) 117 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Herkimer County Urban No 148.3 (137.0, 160.5) 39 (11, 55) 135 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Washington County Urban No 174.3 (161.9, 187.4) 6 (1, 27) 158 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Wayne County Urban No 158.4 (148.3, 169.0) 20 (6, 45) 199 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Chautauqua County Rural No 157.6 (149.2, 166.5) 23 (8, 42) 283 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Clinton County Rural No 172.4 (161.0, 184.6) 8 (2, 28) 178 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Niagara County Urban No 163.0 (156.2, 170.1) 14 (6, 32) 465 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Oneida County Urban No 154.8 (148.4, 161.4) 26 (13, 43) 474 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Steuben County Rural No 168.0 (158.1, 178.4) 10 (2, 30) 226 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.5)
Franklin County Rural No 177.2 (161.8, 193.8) 4 (1, 31) 105 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Fulton County Rural No 176.2 (162.6, 190.9) 5 (1, 27) 132 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Genesee County Rural No 161.3 (148.9, 174.7) 17 (4, 45) 131 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Allegany County Rural No 163.2 (149.1, 178.5) 13 (3, 47) 105 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 2.0)
Yates County Rural No 160.1 (141.8, 180.6) 19 (2, 54) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 162.4 (148.2, 177.7) 15 (3, 50) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Onondaga County Urban No 139.0 (134.6, 143.6) 51 (40, 55) 785 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.1)
Orleans County Urban No 189.3 (172.1, 208.0) 2 (1, 16) 96 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Schuyler County Rural No 197.6 (173.7, 224.3) 1 (1, 20) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Chemung County Urban No 187.0 (175.4, 199.2) 3 (1, 10) 209 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 4.6)
Broome County Urban No 150.9 (144.1, 157.9) 34 (17, 48) 412 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 4.9)
Tioga County Urban No 152.9 (140.1, 166.6) 30 (7, 54) 113 stable stable trend 5.7 (-0.6, 9.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top