Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A No 154.0 (152.9, 155.1) N/A 15,260 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.2, -1.1)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Wake County Urban Yes 120.5 (117.1, 124.1) 100 (92, 100) 957 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.6, -2.4)
Hyde County Rural No 134.0 (91.8, 195.4) 91 (2, 100) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.9)
Rowan County Urban No 168.7 (159.5, 178.3) 41 (20, 71) 268 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -1.6)
Durham County Urban No 125.3 (118.2, 132.7) 97 (87, 100) 245 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Tyrrell County Rural No 185.6 (126.2, 272.0) 19 (1, 100) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.2)
Avery County Rural No 132.0 (113.1, 154.0) 93 (48, 100) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.1)
Orange County Urban Yes 122.1 (113.6, 131.2) 98 (88, 100) 160 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Granville County Rural No 169.8 (153.9, 187.1) 37 (9, 85) 89 falling falling trend -2.1 (-10.5, -0.4)
Mecklenburg County Urban Yes 121.2 (117.3, 125.2) 99 (91, 100) 761 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Cabarrus County Urban No 140.5 (132.7, 148.5) 86 (69, 95) 257 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Franklin County Urban No 154.4 (140.6, 169.3) 74 (26, 92) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Jackson County Rural No 129.3 (115.4, 144.6) 95 (68, 100) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Madison County Urban No 156.1 (136.7, 177.9) 66 (12, 95) 51 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Buncombe County Urban No 135.9 (130.5, 141.5) 90 (80, 96) 499 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Clay County Rural No 126.6 (106.1, 151.6) 96 (48, 100) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Cherokee County Rural No 152.3 (136.7, 169.6) 76 (27, 95) 85 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Dare County Rural No 159.6 (144.1, 176.6) 62 (17, 91) 88 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Lee County Rural No 149.2 (135.4, 164.3) 80 (33, 95) 90 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Beaufort County Rural No 158.4 (143.7, 174.6) 64 (19, 91) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Carteret County Rural No 164.1 (153.5, 175.6) 53 (22, 83) 192 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Chatham County Urban No 130.2 (120.5, 140.7) 94 (79, 100) 150 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Gaston County Urban No 168.0 (160.5, 175.8) 42 (24, 68) 394 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Moore County Urban No 145.9 (136.9, 155.4) 83 (55, 94) 222 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
New Hanover County Urban No 145.7 (139.0, 152.6) 84 (62, 91) 381 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Pamlico County Rural No 164.6 (137.2, 197.8) 52 (3, 98) 33 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Pasquotank County Rural No 161.7 (142.7, 182.8) 56 (11, 94) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Union County Urban No 142.5 (135.1, 150.3) 85 (64, 94) 289 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Vance County Rural No 183.1 (161.7, 207.3) 23 (3, 78) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.7, -0.1)
Iredell County Urban No 150.4 (142.7, 158.4) 79 (50, 90) 301 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Catawba County Urban No 160.5 (152.2, 169.1) 61 (31, 79) 301 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Rockingham County Urban No 175.5 (164.3, 187.4) 30 (12, 65) 195 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Transylvania County Rural No 132.9 (119.7, 147.7) 92 (63, 100) 89 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Wilson County Rural No 164.1 (150.1, 179.4) 54 (17, 86) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Brunswick County Urban No 155.9 (148.2, 164.1) 69 (39, 85) 403 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Hoke County Urban No 217.8 (188.4, 250.5) 2 (1, 39) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 156.1 (145.6, 167.3) 67 (32, 88) 175 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Pitt County Urban No 149.1 (139.1, 159.7) 81 (46, 93) 171 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Polk County Rural No 139.6 (120.6, 161.7) 87 (37, 100) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.3, -0.1)
Scotland County Rural No 191.3 (166.8, 219.1) 14 (1, 72) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Warren County Rural No 138.4 (113.3, 170.3) 88 (19, 100) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Craven County Rural No 167.0 (156.0, 178.7) 47 (18, 77) 189 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Greene County Rural No 177.0 (148.4, 210.6) 27 (1, 94) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Guilford County Urban No 146.9 (141.6, 152.3) 82 (64, 90) 619 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Johnston County Urban No 166.4 (157.8, 175.5) 50 (24, 73) 296 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Nash County Urban No 161.0 (148.3, 174.7) 58 (22, 88) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Northampton County Rural No 150.8 (123.7, 185.1) 78 (9, 100) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Stokes County Urban No 167.3 (153.3, 182.5) 44 (13, 84) 113 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Watauga County Rural No 136.8 (123.2, 151.7) 89 (56, 100) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Yadkin County Urban No 165.4 (149.7, 182.7) 51 (13, 87) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Yancey County Rural No 154.9 (136.4, 176.0) 72 (16, 96) 53 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Chowan County Rural No 167.4 (138.9, 201.5) 43 (2, 97) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Cumberland County Urban No 183.4 (174.1, 193.1) 22 (8, 45) 301 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Gates County Urban No 155.4 (120.5, 198.4) 71 (3, 100) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Hertford County Rural No 186.2 (153.0, 226.4) 18 (1, 92) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Jones County Rural No 161.3 (127.3, 203.7) 57 (2, 100) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Lenoir County Rural No 177.0 (159.5, 196.1) 26 (6, 81) 83 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Macon County Rural No 154.9 (140.7, 170.5) 73 (25, 93) 102 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Person County Urban No 169.6 (152.0, 189.0) 38 (9, 86) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Wilkes County Rural No 166.9 (155.3, 179.3) 48 (18, 79) 166 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Caswell County Rural No 175.3 (151.4, 202.6) 32 (3, 89) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Harnett County Rural No 181.3 (169.7, 193.6) 24 (8, 56) 187 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.1)
Haywood County Rural No 159.0 (147.8, 170.9) 63 (26, 87) 166 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Henderson County Urban No 156.0 (147.7, 164.8) 68 (40, 85) 300 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Perquimans County Rural No 161.8 (136.0, 192.6) 55 (5, 98) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Alamance County Urban No 167.2 (158.3, 176.4) 46 (21, 71) 282 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Alexander County Urban No 169.0 (152.8, 186.7) 40 (10, 84) 84 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Bertie County Rural No 197.7 (162.1, 241.4) 8 (1, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Duplin County Rural No 176.3 (158.2, 196.2) 29 (6, 82) 77 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Pender County Urban No 172.6 (158.4, 187.8) 35 (9, 77) 117 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Stanly County Rural No 174.1 (160.7, 188.3) 33 (10, 71) 133 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Ashe County Rural No 156.7 (140.7, 174.5) 65 (20, 93) 77 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Burke County Urban No 170.0 (159.4, 181.2) 36 (15, 72) 208 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Davie County Urban No 152.0 (138.1, 167.1) 77 (31, 94) 93 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Edgecombe County Urban No 195.2 (173.1, 220.0) 11 (1, 61) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Randolph County Urban No 173.5 (164.6, 182.9) 34 (15, 62) 300 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Rutherford County Rural No 175.5 (163.0, 188.8) 31 (10, 68) 158 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Caldwell County Urban No 191.4 (179.6, 203.8) 13 (4, 39) 213 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Cleveland County Rural No 185.5 (173.9, 197.8) 20 (6, 49) 202 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Columbus County Rural No 200.0 (182.2, 219.3) 7 (1, 40) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Davidson County Urban No 181.2 (172.9, 189.8) 25 (11, 47) 377 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Graham County Rural No 167.3 (136.0, 205.5) 45 (1, 100) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Wayne County Urban No 190.7 (177.8, 204.3) 15 (4, 42) 173 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Halifax County Rural No 183.9 (162.9, 207.5) 21 (2, 75) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Surry County Rural No 186.2 (174.1, 199.1) 17 (6, 49) 187 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Bladen County Rural No 187.9 (165.3, 213.4) 16 (1, 71) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Onslow County Urban No 205.9 (194.1, 218.1) 5 (1, 22) 241 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Alleghany County Rural No 160.8 (134.6, 192.2) 59 (7, 99) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-11.6, 9.6)
Richmond County Rural No 216.7 (195.7, 239.6) 3 (1, 24) 83 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
McDowell County Rural No 191.7 (176.4, 208.1) 12 (2, 47) 123 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Robeson County Rural No 214.8 (196.2, 235.1) 4 (1, 21) 104 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Sampson County Rural No 203.1 (185.2, 222.6) 6 (1, 37) 99 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Washington County Rural No 176.5 (140.6, 222.8) 28 (1, 100) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Martin County Rural No 169.2 (144.3, 198.2) 39 (4, 94) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 8.4)
Anson County Urban No 197.3 (166.8, 232.7) 9 (1, 83) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Camden County Urban No 166.9 (134.1, 205.9) 49 (2, 100) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 4.6)
Swain County Rural No 227.9 (192.8, 268.6) 1 (1, 40) 34 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Forsyth County Urban No 153.0 (147.0, 159.2) 75 (51, 85) 519 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 4.5)
Currituck County Urban No 155.5 (136.1, 177.1) 70 (16, 97) 53 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 9.4)
Mitchell County Rural No 196.3 (170.9, 225.2) 10 (1, 63) 48 stable stable trend 7.4 (-0.6, 13.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 160.6 (140.2, 183.8) 60 (10, 95) 51 stable stable trend 8.8 (-0.8, 15.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top