Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A No 170.3 (168.9, 171.7) N/A 12,329 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -1.0)
United States N/A No 151.2 (151.0, 151.4) N/A 464,032 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Scott County Rural No 185.4 (163.2, 210.1) 53 (8, 91) 52 falling falling trend -6.7 (-16.3, -1.6)
Shelby County Urban No 146.7 (141.7, 151.7) 91 (84, 94) 706 falling falling trend -2.2 (-5.1, -1.4)
Davidson County Urban No 150.4 (145.3, 155.6) 90 (81, 93) 702 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.7)
Smith County Urban No 189.1 (165.3, 215.7) 48 (5, 88) 48 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.9, -0.9)
Hamilton County Urban No 144.8 (139.4, 150.4) 92 (85, 94) 570 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Marion County Urban No 184.3 (165.5, 204.9) 56 (11, 86) 74 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Maury County Urban No 154.3 (143.9, 165.4) 87 (68, 93) 172 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Wilson County Urban No 154.3 (145.7, 163.3) 88 (72, 93) 252 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Bledsoe County Rural No 130.9 (109.5, 156.0) 93 (74, 95) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Humphreys County Rural No 182.9 (160.3, 208.2) 59 (8, 90) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Loudon County Urban No 153.4 (141.5, 166.1) 89 (65, 94) 148 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Roane County Urban No 167.0 (154.6, 180.4) 77 (45, 91) 143 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Blount County Urban No 158.8 (150.8, 167.2) 84 (67, 92) 310 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Claiborne County Rural No 198.1 (179.4, 218.5) 28 (4, 74) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Fayette County Urban No 154.4 (138.3, 172.3) 86 (52, 94) 76 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Grainger County Urban No 188.7 (167.9, 211.8) 49 (8, 86) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Knox County Urban No 156.7 (151.9, 161.7) 85 (75, 91) 812 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Warren County Rural No 197.3 (179.8, 216.1) 30 (5, 71) 99 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.7, -0.4)
Giles County Rural No 170.3 (152.0, 190.4) 70 (26, 92) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Perry County Rural No 163.8 (132.4, 201.3) 82 (8, 95) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Stewart County Urban No 177.7 (151.5, 207.7) 66 (9, 93) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Coffee County Rural No 182.2 (168.2, 197.3) 61 (19, 84) 130 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Fentress County Rural No 190.8 (168.1, 216.2) 44 (5, 86) 56 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Franklin County Rural No 162.5 (147.7, 178.6) 83 (48, 93) 95 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 170.1 (157.3, 183.9) 71 (41, 90) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Moore County Rural No 122.8 (92.7, 161.1) 95 (58, 95) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Rutherford County Urban No 166.7 (159.3, 174.3) 78 (59, 87) 408 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Sumner County Urban No 165.2 (157.5, 173.2) 79 (59, 88) 359 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
White County Rural No 170.6 (152.6, 190.4) 69 (24, 93) 68 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Anderson County Urban No 169.2 (158.1, 180.9) 75 (43, 89) 182 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Decatur County Rural No 189.4 (160.5, 222.9) 47 (3, 91) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Greene County Rural No 189.6 (177.6, 202.4) 45 (15, 72) 199 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Hamblen County Urban No 197.2 (183.2, 212.2) 31 (8, 66) 153 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Hardin County Rural No 168.2 (150.1, 188.3) 76 (29, 93) 69 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Lincoln County Rural No 183.8 (166.2, 202.9) 57 (12, 88) 86 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Montgomery County Urban No 177.0 (166.7, 187.8) 68 (34, 82) 231 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Polk County Urban No 200.0 (175.5, 227.5) 25 (2, 82) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Cumberland County Rural No 164.8 (153.8, 176.6) 81 (52, 90) 203 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Macon County Urban No 194.2 (171.6, 219.1) 37 (4, 84) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Madison County Urban No 164.9 (152.8, 178.0) 80 (52, 92) 146 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Marshall County Rural No 196.6 (176.9, 218.1) 33 (4, 77) 77 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Sullivan County Urban No 182.3 (174.5, 190.5) 60 (33, 74) 438 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Washington County Urban No 170.0 (161.2, 179.3) 72 (50, 86) 294 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Campbell County Urban No 197.7 (181.3, 215.4) 29 (6, 71) 114 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Cocke County Rural No 207.9 (190.2, 227.0) 15 (2, 60) 112 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Jackson County Rural No 181.2 (154.2, 212.5) 63 (6, 93) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Lake County Rural No 230.5 (181.6, 290.6) 5 (1, 86) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.0)
Lawrence County Rural No 180.5 (164.8, 197.3) 64 (18, 85) 101 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Monroe County Rural No 185.0 (170.2, 201.1) 54 (15, 82) 126 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Robertson County Urban No 186.2 (172.2, 201.1) 52 (16, 78) 141 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Unicoi County Urban No 184.6 (162.4, 209.6) 55 (7, 90) 52 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Bradley County Urban No 177.2 (166.9, 188.1) 67 (35, 82) 229 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Cheatham County Urban No 206.1 (187.0, 226.7) 18 (2, 65) 96 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Henry County Rural No 192.0 (174.4, 211.2) 41 (6, 78) 94 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
McMinn County Rural No 186.8 (172.7, 201.8) 51 (14, 80) 139 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
McNairy County Rural No 193.4 (173.2, 215.7) 39 (5, 81) 70 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lauderdale County Rural No 208.1 (181.6, 237.8) 14 (1, 76) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Union County Urban No 206.9 (182.6, 233.9) 17 (1, 76) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Bedford County Rural No 195.7 (178.4, 214.4) 35 (6, 73) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Grundy County Rural No 204.8 (177.0, 236.3) 23 (1, 81) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Haywood County Rural No 189.5 (156.6, 228.6) 46 (1, 93) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Obion County Rural No 196.8 (177.4, 218.1) 32 (5, 75) 80 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Tipton County Urban No 198.3 (182.0, 215.8) 27 (6, 70) 115 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Carroll County Rural No 205.9 (185.3, 228.5) 19 (3, 70) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Johnson County Rural No 191.2 (168.0, 217.3) 43 (4, 86) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Meigs County Rural No 194.8 (165.6, 228.1) 36 (2, 90) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Morgan County Urban No 207.6 (183.6, 234.2) 16 (1, 73) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Putnam County Rural No 194.0 (181.1, 207.7) 38 (11, 69) 176 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Sevier County Rural No 181.9 (171.2, 193.1) 62 (27, 78) 240 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Weakley County Rural No 188.1 (169.4, 208.6) 50 (8, 83) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Cannon County Urban No 183.6 (156.1, 214.8) 58 (4, 93) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Hickman County Urban No 215.5 (192.5, 240.8) 11 (1, 67) 68 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Williamson County Urban No 122.9 (116.6, 129.4) 94 (92, 95) 302 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 2.4)
Hancock County Rural No 191.8 (154.9, 236.1) 42 (1, 93) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
DeKalb County Rural No 205.4 (181.5, 232.0) 21 (1, 75) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Dyer County Rural No 193.2 (174.6, 213.4) 40 (6, 79) 82 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Pickett County Rural No 178.8 (139.6, 228.6) 65 (1, 95) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Rhea County Rural No 210.0 (190.6, 231.0) 12 (2, 63) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Dickson County Urban No 202.4 (186.6, 219.3) 24 (5, 65) 128 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Hardeman County Rural No 205.8 (179.7, 235.2) 20 (1, 76) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Hawkins County Urban No 198.5 (184.9, 213.0) 26 (7, 63) 170 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Henderson County Rural No 215.8 (193.9, 239.7) 10 (1, 62) 74 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Trousdale County Urban No 235.9 (193.9, 284.6) 3 (1, 76) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Van Buren County Rural No 196.6 (158.1, 243.4) 34 (1, 93) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.4)
Benton County Rural No 209.5 (183.1, 239.1) 13 (1, 75) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Overton County Rural No 239.9 (215.4, 266.7) 1 (1, 29) 75 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Wayne County Rural No 205.1 (179.0, 234.5) 22 (1, 78) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.2)
Clay County Rural No 237.2 (198.7, 282.5) 2 (1, 65) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Houston County Rural No 215.9 (179.4, 258.8) 9 (1, 85) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Chester County Urban No 228.9 (199.3, 262.1) 6 (1, 58) 45 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 6.9)
Crockett County Urban No 234.2 (200.5, 272.5) 4 (1, 61) 36 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Carter County Urban No 169.3 (157.0, 182.4) 74 (41, 89) 150 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.8, 6.1)
Gibson County Urban No 221.2 (203.7, 239.9) 7 (1, 40) 122 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.9, 8.5)
Sequatchie County Urban No 169.5 (145.5, 196.7) 73 (14, 94) 39 rising rising trend 6.7 (0.9, 17.4)
Lewis County Rural No 218.9 (188.6, 253.3) 8 (1, 71) 40 stable stable trend 7.6 (-0.7, 13.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 6:09 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top