Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A No 176.6 (174.1, 179.1) N/A 4,207 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States N/A No 166.5 (165.9, 167.1) N/A 70,844 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.0, -1.9)
Currituck County Urban No 171.0 (99.4, 277.5) 56 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.3)
Camden County Urban No 257.9 (140.9, 435.1) 2 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.6)
Yadkin County Urban No 295.9 (175.2, 467.4) 1 (1, 82) 4
*
*
McDowell County Rural No 211.5 (129.7, 326.9) 15 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural No 223.7 (129.8, 369.4) 5 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.7)
Wilkes County Rural Yes 101.2 (62.6, 156.9) 82 (43, 82) 4 falling falling trend -6.7 (-19.9, -3.1)
Alexander County Urban No 239.7 (158.9, 348.2) 3 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Pamlico County Rural No 143.6 (92.1, 219.2) 78 (5, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 1.7)
Stokes County Urban No 208.2 (136.6, 307.8) 18 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.4, 26.1)
Henderson County Urban No 187.3 (127.5, 264.7) 41 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 139.7 (100.1, 190.2) 80 (11, 82) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.8, -0.6)
Surry County Rural No 222.8 (160.2, 303.9) 6 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.6)
Caldwell County Urban No 174.5 (126.1, 235.9) 52 (2, 82) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.3)
Perquimans County Rural No 193.1 (139.8, 263.9) 32 (1, 82) 9 stable stable trend 19.6 (-4.7, 41.0)
Burke County Urban No 136.4 (99.7, 183.3) 81 (21, 82) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Carteret County Rural No 188.1 (136.7, 254.0) 38 (1, 82) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Davie County Urban No 234.9 (173.8, 313.2) 4 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.8)
Jones County Rural No 215.9 (154.9, 297.0) 12 (1, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Gates County Urban No 178.1 (132.1, 239.5) 47 (2, 82) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.6)
Chowan County Rural No 161.7 (120.3, 214.4) 70 (5, 82) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-11.3, -2.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 192.5 (145.4, 251.4) 33 (2, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Greene County Rural No 141.6 (107.8, 183.4) 79 (20, 82) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Stanly County Rural No 196.0 (152.0, 248.8) 26 (1, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Washington County Rural No 210.3 (163.1, 267.8) 16 (1, 79) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.9, 17.1)
Rutherford County Rural No 217.0 (172.1, 270.6) 9 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Caswell County Rural No 160.1 (129.0, 197.9) 72 (12, 82) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Pender County Urban No 175.1 (141.5, 214.9) 51 (6, 81) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Randolph County Urban No 209.1 (168.8, 255.9) 17 (1, 76) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Chatham County Urban No 152.8 (125.1, 185.8) 76 (21, 82) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
Bladen County Rural No 165.1 (136.0, 199.3) 65 (11, 81) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.6)
Bertie County Rural No 167.8 (138.6, 201.9) 62 (10, 81) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Anson County Urban No 203.0 (169.3, 241.7) 19 (2, 76) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Person County Urban No 179.9 (149.3, 215.6) 42 (6, 80) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Hertford County Rural No 161.6 (134.6, 193.0) 71 (14, 81) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.7)
Hoke County Urban No 144.5 (120.2, 172.4) 77 (35, 82) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.0)
Lee County Rural No 194.9 (162.8, 231.7) 28 (3, 77) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Catawba County Urban No 194.7 (162.3, 231.6) 29 (3, 77) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Beaufort County Rural No 178.7 (148.9, 213.3) 45 (7, 80) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Pasquotank County Rural No 158.7 (133.1, 188.1) 73 (19, 81) 28 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Warren County Rural No 187.4 (157.3, 222.5) 40 (5, 78) 29 stable stable trend 10.2 (-1.6, 20.1)
Scotland County Rural No 197.2 (165.8, 233.0) 23 (3, 75) 30 stable stable trend -3.1 (-12.3, 1.0)
Buncombe County Urban No 165.6 (139.3, 195.5) 64 (14, 81) 31 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Brunswick County Urban No 163.2 (137.3, 193.0) 69 (16, 81) 31 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.1)
Martin County Rural No 211.6 (177.6, 251.0) 14 (1, 70) 31 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 11.1)
Orange County Urban No 168.6 (142.5, 198.2) 61 (11, 81) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.1)
Duplin County Rural No 179.2 (151.0, 211.5) 44 (6, 79) 32 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Northampton County Rural No 193.6 (162.2, 230.2) 30 (3, 77) 32 stable stable trend 10.6 (-1.8, 21.7)
Richmond County Rural No 215.2 (182.1, 252.6) 13 (1, 66) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Davidson County Urban No 168.9 (143.7, 197.4) 60 (14, 80) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Franklin County Urban No 154.2 (131.6, 179.7) 74 (23, 81) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Moore County Urban No 222.1 (189.8, 258.6) 7 (1, 57) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Columbus County Rural No 191.1 (164.0, 221.7) 36 (5, 75) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Iredell County Urban No 163.2 (140.5, 188.6) 68 (21, 81) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Sampson County Rural No 191.7 (165.9, 220.9) 35 (5, 74) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Rockingham County Urban No 177.6 (153.3, 204.9) 49 (10, 79) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Onslow County Urban No 175.6 (152.1, 201.6) 50 (11, 79) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Union County Urban No 166.7 (144.3, 191.6) 63 (17, 80) 44 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.7)
Cleveland County Rural No 197.5 (170.6, 227.4) 22 (3, 71) 45 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Granville County Rural No 178.4 (155.4, 204.2) 46 (11, 77) 45 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Rowan County Urban No 177.6 (154.5, 203.4) 48 (12, 78) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Vance County Rural No 199.7 (174.8, 227.3) 20 (4, 67) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Craven County Rural No 197.1 (173.1, 223.6) 24 (5, 68) 52 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Harnett County Rural No 193.2 (169.5, 219.3) 31 (6, 72) 52 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Lenoir County Rural No 163.4 (143.6, 185.5) 67 (24, 80) 54 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Johnston County Urban No 164.9 (145.2, 186.5) 66 (23, 80) 59 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.1)
Cabarrus County Urban No 169.7 (149.8, 191.3) 57 (19, 79) 61 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.4)
Robeson County Rural No 188.0 (166.8, 211.3) 39 (7, 71) 61 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
New Hanover County Urban No 197.7 (176.1, 221.3) 21 (5, 64) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Gaston County Urban No 179.4 (159.8, 200.6) 43 (11, 75) 68 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Wilson County Rural No 190.5 (170.7, 212.0) 37 (7, 67) 73 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Edgecombe County Urban No 195.1 (175.0, 217.1) 27 (6, 64) 75 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Halifax County Rural No 216.1 (194.3, 240.0) 11 (2, 44) 77 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Nash County Urban No 169.1 (152.2, 187.4) 59 (25, 78) 80 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Alamance County Urban No 221.4 (200.2, 244.2) 8 (2, 38) 87 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Wayne County Urban No 216.9 (197.6, 237.7) 10 (2, 36) 99 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Pitt County Urban No 191.8 (175.6, 209.1) 34 (10, 61) 114 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Durham County Urban No 171.7 (160.6, 183.3) 55 (31, 72) 195 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Forsyth County Urban No 196.3 (183.9, 209.4) 25 (10, 48) 203 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Cumberland County Urban No 173.0 (162.6, 184.0) 54 (29, 71) 217 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Guilford County Urban No 174.1 (164.8, 183.7) 53 (29, 69) 291 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Wake County Urban No 153.0 (144.7, 161.5) 75 (58, 79) 296 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Mecklenburg County Urban No 169.5 (162.4, 176.9) 58 (39, 70) 491 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 10:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top