Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 170.9 (168.6, 173.2) N/A 4,430 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States N/A No 166.5 (165.9, 167.1) N/A 70,844 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.0, -1.9)
Yuba County Urban Yes 106.8 (63.2, 170.1) 33 (10, 34) 4 falling falling trend -17.3 (-33.6, -2.2)
Contra Costa County Urban No 169.5 (158.9, 180.7) 20 (9, 26) 202 falling falling trend -7.2 (-10.9, -3.2)
Monterey County Urban No 123.2 (95.6, 156.3) 32 (18, 34) 14 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.3)
Napa County Urban No 143.2 (90.9, 215.2) 26 (1, 34) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.0, -1.3)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 130.4 (83.6, 192.9) 31 (3, 34) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.3, 0.6)
Alameda County Urban No 165.9 (158.2, 174.0) 22 (12, 26) 361 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Sonoma County Urban No 142.6 (106.5, 186.3) 27 (4, 34) 12 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.1)
San Mateo County Urban No 181.1 (158.8, 205.9) 12 (2, 26) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.5)
Imperial County Urban No 179.0 (115.2, 265.1) 14 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 0.6)
Placer County Urban No 134.4 (99.5, 177.0) 30 (6, 34) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 1.4)
Los Angeles County Urban No 172.9 (169.2, 176.7) 19 (11, 22) 1,745 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Santa Clara County Urban No 135.8 (121.1, 151.8) 29 (22, 33) 66 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Riverside County Urban No 163.5 (154.8, 172.5) 24 (13, 27) 289 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Fresno County Urban No 192.8 (174.2, 212.7) 4 (1, 20) 85 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Orange County Urban No 142.1 (127.7, 157.7) 28 (20, 33) 79 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
San Francisco County Urban No 192.2 (176.8, 208.7) 6 (1, 19) 118 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Sacramento County Urban No 179.3 (169.9, 189.2) 13 (5, 22) 290 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Yolo County Urban No 178.5 (127.0, 242.4) 15 (1, 33) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.5)
San Joaquin County Urban No 187.1 (171.2, 204.2) 9 (2, 22) 111 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Solano County Urban No 175.2 (161.5, 189.7) 17 (5, 26) 131 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Ventura County Urban No 147.5 (122.6, 175.9) 25 (9, 33) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Butte County Urban No 229.1 (160.2, 315.4) 1 (1, 31) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 3.1)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 165.9 (129.4, 209.4) 23 (1, 32) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9)
Kern County Urban No 192.4 (172.7, 213.7) 5 (1, 22) 77 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Stanislaus County Urban No 187.9 (157.5, 222.3) 8 (1, 27) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 1.0)
Tulare County Urban No 174.8 (131.2, 228.0) 18 (1, 32) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.2)
Merced County Urban No 212.2 (171.8, 259.1) 2 (1, 25) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Kings County Urban No 200.6 (145.0, 268.2) 3 (1, 31) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.8)
Madera County Urban No 181.6 (128.5, 248.7) 11 (1, 33) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 7.3)
San Bernardino County Urban No 183.5 (174.4, 193.0) 10 (4, 19) 332 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 5.3)
San Diego County Urban No 168.4 (158.9, 178.4) 21 (10, 26) 253 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.8, 5.5)
Marin County Urban No 189.5 (143.9, 244.6) 7 (1, 31) 12 stable stable trend 4.5 (-2.4, 20.2)
Lake County Rural No 175.5 (103.9, 280.1) 16 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Santa Cruz County Urban Yes 101.0 (57.7, 164.2) 34 (11, 34) 3
*
*
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
El Dorado County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shasta County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutter County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 5:52 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top