Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Florida by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida N/A No 148.2 (146.3, 150.1) N/A 5,071 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.0)
United States N/A No 166.5 (165.9, 167.1) N/A 70,844 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.0, -1.9)
Baker County Urban Yes 106.2 (58.8, 175.1) 56 (6, 58) 3 falling falling trend -16.0 (-53.9, -0.5)
Seminole County Urban No 150.3 (135.7, 166.0) 38 (15, 50) 80 falling falling trend -8.3 (-14.5, -1.4)
Monroe County Rural No 129.5 (86.8, 184.9) 50 (6, 58) 6 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.5, -2.7)
St. Johns County Urban No 133.0 (109.0, 160.7) 47 (15, 57) 22 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.0)
Pasco County Urban Yes 117.4 (100.3, 136.4) 55 (38, 57) 39 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.5)
Santa Rosa County Urban No 141.3 (102.8, 188.3) 43 (5, 58) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Sarasota County Urban No 152.7 (131.4, 176.7) 34 (9, 53) 38 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.2)
Charlotte County Urban Yes 82.2 (64.4, 104.1) 58 (53, 58) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
Putnam County Rural No 183.8 (150.9, 221.8) 11 (3, 46) 24 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Collier County Urban Yes 95.3 (79.3, 113.5) 57 (51, 58) 26 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.1)
Highlands County Urban No 161.0 (130.9, 196.3) 26 (5, 54) 21 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.0)
Lee County Urban No 131.3 (118.9, 144.5) 49 (31, 55) 85 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Sumter County Urban Yes 119.1 (89.5, 155.6) 54 (18, 58) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
Palm Beach County Urban Yes 122.6 (116.7, 128.7) 53 (45, 56) 348 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.1)
St. Lucie County Urban No 135.2 (124.0, 147.2) 46 (31, 54) 112 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.6)
Taylor County Rural No 153.6 (105.2, 217.0) 33 (3, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.5)
Gadsden County Urban No 175.5 (153.9, 199.4) 15 (4, 42) 50 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Volusia County Urban No 163.1 (148.7, 178.5) 22 (10, 43) 98 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Hillsborough County Urban No 162.9 (154.9, 171.2) 24 (13, 36) 346 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Indian River County Urban No 170.6 (141.1, 204.3) 16 (4, 50) 25 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Okeechobee County Rural No 183.3 (114.7, 276.1) 13 (2, 58) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 1.3)
Walton County Urban No 168.6 (114.0, 239.7) 18 (2, 57) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 1.2)
Bay County Urban No 164.5 (138.5, 193.8) 21 (5, 51) 31 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.1)
Lake County Urban No 153.8 (138.0, 170.9) 32 (13, 49) 73 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.1)
Polk County Urban No 152.1 (141.7, 162.9) 35 (18, 46) 171 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Washington County Urban No 211.1 (143.0, 299.6) 5 (2, 55) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.3)
Clay County Urban No 123.7 (102.4, 147.9) 52 (26, 57) 27 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.4, 0.1)
Leon County Urban No 161.2 (147.8, 175.4) 25 (11, 43) 115 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Manatee County Urban No 148.4 (130.6, 168.0) 40 (14, 53) 54 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.6)
Suwannee County Rural No 146.2 (106.0, 197.3) 42 (4, 57) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Columbia County Rural No 155.9 (126.0, 190.8) 28 (6, 55) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Duval County Urban No 168.9 (161.8, 176.2) 17 (11, 31) 472 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Miami-Dade County Urban No 150.4 (145.2, 155.7) 37 (25, 44) 668 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Alachua County Urban No 180.0 (163.1, 198.2) 14 (4, 33) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Hamilton County Rural No 206.3 (149.6, 277.8) 6 (2, 53) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.5)
Madison County Rural No 189.1 (149.6, 236.6) 9 (2, 49) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.1)
Pinellas County Urban No 163.0 (152.2, 174.5) 23 (11, 40) 176 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Broward County Urban No 132.7 (128.3, 137.2) 48 (39, 53) 735 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Escambia County Urban No 185.8 (171.6, 200.8) 10 (5, 24) 134 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Hernando County Urban No 148.7 (121.2, 180.8) 39 (8, 55) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.1)
Okaloosa County Urban No 165.5 (136.4, 198.7) 20 (5, 52) 26 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.2)
Brevard County Urban No 139.8 (128.1, 152.4) 44 (26, 53) 110 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.5)
Orange County Urban No 150.5 (143.5, 157.7) 36 (23, 45) 378 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Hendry County Rural No 225.3 (165.1, 300.1) 4 (2, 47) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.1)
DeSoto County Rural No 240.8 (170.0, 329.7) 2 (2, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.5)
Gulf County Rural No 237.2 (149.8, 357.7) 3 (2, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.1, 2.5)
Nassau County Urban No 155.8 (117.7, 203.1) 29 (4, 56) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Bradford County Rural No 127.1 (82.6, 185.9) 51 (5, 58) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.5)
Flagler County Urban No 155.7 (131.6, 183.6) 30 (7, 53) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.7)
Levy County Urban No 199.5 (145.8, 267.4) 7 (2, 54) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Martin County Urban No 155.1 (119.6, 197.8) 31 (5, 56) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Jackson County Rural No 198.3 (167.3, 233.6) 8 (2, 37) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Osceola County Urban No 146.5 (129.4, 165.1) 41 (15, 53) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.9)
Union County Rural No 597.8 (455.6, 769.6) 1 (1, 1) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Citrus County Urban No 167.1 (125.5, 219.0) 19 (3, 56) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-9.7, 16.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 183.5 (139.1, 239.0) 12 (2, 54) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 17.7)
Marion County Urban No 161.0 (146.2, 176.9) 27 (10, 44) 90 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.4, 12.2)
Wakulla County Urban No 138.7 (87.3, 207.8) 45 (3, 58) 5
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dixie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilchrist County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glades County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top