Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana N/A No 189.8 (186.5, 193.1) N/A 2,828 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
United States N/A No 166.5 (165.9, 167.1) N/A 70,844 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.0, -1.9)
East Baton Rouge Parish Urban No 170.0 (161.3, 179.0) 56 (42, 60) 317 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -2.4)
Tensas Parish Rural No 191.1 (131.2, 274.7) 41 (2, 61) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.8)
Grant Parish Urban No 176.5 (112.2, 263.9) 54 (2, 61) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.7, 0.7)
Livingston Parish Urban No 166.4 (124.0, 217.6) 59 (10, 61) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.0)
St. John the Baptist Parish Urban No 177.2 (150.3, 207.3) 52 (17, 61) 38 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
Ascension Parish Urban No 183.4 (158.0, 211.4) 51 (15, 61) 45 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.9)
Orleans Parish Urban No 172.8 (165.5, 180.3) 55 (41, 59) 464 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.2)
St. Charles Parish Urban No 164.7 (133.8, 200.6) 60 (21, 61) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.9)
Madison Parish Rural No 196.9 (148.1, 256.4) 36 (3, 61) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Terrebonne Parish Urban No 196.5 (168.4, 227.8) 38 (9, 59) 38 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.3)
Bienville Parish Rural No 195.0 (149.8, 250.2) 39 (3, 61) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.9, -0.3)
Sabine Parish Rural No 218.4 (148.0, 308.9) 19 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 0.7)
Winn Parish Rural No 187.2 (128.3, 263.5) 46 (2, 61) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.0)
St. James Parish Urban No 209.5 (173.0, 252.0) 23 (3, 59) 25 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Avoyelles Parish Rural No 248.3 (207.0, 295.2) 6 (1, 43) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Jefferson Parish Urban No 188.4 (176.1, 201.3) 45 (25, 55) 203 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Pointe Coupee Parish Urban No 221.3 (179.8, 270.2) 16 (2, 59) 22 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
St. Tammany Parish Urban No 167.5 (146.9, 190.2) 58 (29, 61) 53 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Bossier Parish Urban No 168.3 (146.0, 193.0) 57 (27, 61) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Caddo Parish Urban No 190.1 (179.2, 201.6) 43 (24, 53) 241 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Calcasieu Parish Urban No 193.2 (175.7, 212.0) 40 (16, 56) 98 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
LaFourche Parish Urban No 234.1 (195.0, 278.6) 12 (2, 52) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Richland Parish Urban No 206.4 (159.7, 262.3) 27 (2, 61) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
St. Helena Parish Urban No 157.6 (119.8, 204.8) 61 (18, 61) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.4)
St. Mary Parish Rural No 200.5 (171.4, 233.3) 32 (7, 59) 36 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
East Feliciana Parish Urban No 200.6 (160.1, 248.5) 31 (4, 61) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Franklin Parish Rural No 190.9 (145.9, 245.4) 42 (4, 61) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.2)
Ouachita Parish Urban No 185.0 (167.4, 203.8) 48 (21, 59) 93 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.8)
Tangipahoa Parish Urban No 223.5 (200.1, 248.9) 14 (5, 43) 75 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Lincoln Parish Rural No 185.9 (156.4, 219.4) 47 (12, 61) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Rapides Parish Urban No 196.6 (177.0, 217.8) 37 (14, 55) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
St. Martin Parish Urban No 184.4 (154.7, 218.3) 50 (13, 61) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Concordia Parish Rural No 210.6 (165.4, 264.4) 22 (2, 60) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
St. Bernard Parish Urban No 229.1 (171.3, 298.4) 13 (1, 61) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 1.2)
De Soto Parish Urban No 203.4 (166.8, 246.0) 29 (4, 60) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Vermilion Parish Urban No 237.7 (186.7, 297.8) 10 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Washington Parish Rural No 222.6 (188.7, 260.8) 15 (3, 53) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Jefferson Davis Parish Urban No 241.9 (185.4, 310.0) 7 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Webster Parish Rural No 208.6 (176.5, 245.0) 24 (5, 58) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Assumption Parish Urban No 241.4 (190.4, 302.2) 8 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Acadia Parish Urban No 264.9 (220.1, 315.9) 3 (1, 37) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Iberia Parish Rural No 214.5 (185.9, 246.1) 20 (4, 53) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
West Baton Rouge Parish Urban No 198.8 (161.0, 242.7) 35 (5, 61) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.4)
West Feliciana Parish Urban No 206.6 (154.9, 270.5) 26 (2, 61) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.1)
Iberville Parish Urban No 220.5 (187.1, 258.3) 17 (3, 54) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Jackson Parish Rural No 237.9 (182.6, 306.0) 9 (1, 58) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Plaquemines Parish Urban No 213.3 (159.7, 279.2) 21 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Red River Parish Rural No 205.8 (143.7, 286.9) 28 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.9)
Natchitoches Parish Rural No 202.4 (170.4, 238.8) 30 (6, 60) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Union Parish Urban No 250.2 (194.5, 317.1) 5 (1, 56) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.5)
Morehouse Parish Urban No 207.9 (172.5, 248.5) 25 (4, 59) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Beauregard Parish Rural No 219.8 (160.7, 293.5) 18 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
Claiborne Parish Rural No 200.3 (158.8, 249.7) 34 (4, 61) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Lafayette Parish Urban No 200.4 (182.7, 219.3) 33 (12, 52) 105 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 4.3)
St. Landry Parish Rural No 234.5 (211.8, 259.0) 11 (3, 33) 83 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Catahoula Parish Rural No 189.5 (102.6, 316.2) 44 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
East Carroll Parish Rural No 344.5 (262.1, 443.3) 1 (1, 19) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.4)
Allen Parish Rural No 184.7 (130.5, 253.6) 49 (3, 61) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.6)
Evangeline Parish Rural No 260.7 (212.4, 316.6) 4 (1, 43) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.4)
La Salle Parish Rural No 267.0 (166.8, 406.5) 2 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Vernon Parish Rural No 176.7 (129.1, 235.8) 53 (5, 61) 10
*
*
Caldwell Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 7:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top