Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pocahontas County Rural No 22.0 (12.3, 38.7) 6 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Hardy County Rural No 16.3 (9.2, 27.5) 26 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Ritchie County Rural No 26.3 (15.0, 44.4) 1 (1, 44) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.4)
Roane County Rural No 17.6 (10.0, 29.4) 17 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Braxton County Rural No 17.1 (10.2, 28.2) 21 (1, 44) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.3)
Monroe County Rural No 17.0 (10.1, 28.2) 22 (1, 44) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 3.6)
Morgan County Urban No 17.6 (10.2, 28.7) 18 (1, 44) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.7)
Taylor County Rural No 16.9 (10.3, 26.8) 24 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Summers County Rural No 19.3 (11.6, 31.8) 14 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Wetzel County Rural No 22.2 (13.8, 34.5) 5 (1, 44) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.4)
Barbour County Rural No 23.7 (15.2, 35.8) 2 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.0)
Nicholas County Rural No 13.8 (8.8, 20.9) 42 (6, 44) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.1)
Lewis County Rural No 23.3 (15.0, 34.9) 3 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 9.1)
Mason County Rural No 14.6 (9.5, 21.8) 37 (5, 44) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 20.4 (13.4, 30.1) 11 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.9)
Upshur County Rural No 16.8 (11.1, 24.7) 25 (3, 44) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.9, -0.2)
Jackson County Rural No 14.8 (9.8, 21.7) 35 (5, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.7)
Hancock County Urban No 13.2 (8.8, 19.5) 43 (10, 44) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.8, -0.1)
Boone County Urban No 19.7 (13.2, 28.8) 13 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 1.3)
Brooke County Urban No 15.4 (10.4, 22.6) 32 (5, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 15.7)
McDowell County Rural No 23.1 (15.7, 33.5) 4 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.7)
Preston County Urban No 13.8 (9.3, 20.0) 40 (7, 44) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Mineral County Rural No 15.9 (10.9, 22.9) 30 (3, 44) 6 stable stable trend 13.7 (-2.3, 27.0)
Wyoming County Rural No 21.0 (14.2, 30.3) 10 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.4, 1.5)
Mingo County Rural No 21.6 (14.8, 30.7) 7 (1, 42) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.2)
Hampshire County Urban No 21.4 (14.6, 30.6) 8 (1, 43) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.6)
Marshall County Urban No 17.4 (12.4, 24.2) 19 (2, 44) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.2)
Randolph County Rural No 20.2 (14.4, 28.0) 12 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Greenbrier County Rural No 16.1 (11.6, 22.2) 29 (5, 44) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Ohio County Urban No 13.9 (9.9, 19.1) 39 (9, 44) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.7)
Logan County Rural No 21.0 (15.3, 28.4) 9 (1, 40) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Putnam County Urban No 12.9 (9.5, 17.3) 44 (16, 44) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
Wayne County Urban No 18.0 (13.1, 24.3) 16 (2, 43) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.7, 17.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 14.2 (10.6, 18.8) 38 (11, 44) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.6)
Fayette County Urban No 19.2 (14.5, 25.2) 15 (2, 41) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.0)
Marion County Rural No 17.3 (13.3, 22.2) 20 (4, 43) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Monongalia County Urban No 13.8 (10.7, 17.6) 41 (14, 44) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 6.6)
Mercer County Rural No 17.0 (13.2, 21.7) 23 (6, 43) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Harrison County Rural No 15.9 (12.4, 20.2) 31 (8, 44) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.3)
Raleigh County Urban No 15.1 (12.0, 18.9) 33 (11, 44) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Cabell County Urban No 14.9 (12.0, 18.4) 34 (12, 44) 18 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.1)
Wood County Urban No 16.3 (13.1, 20.0) 27 (8, 43) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Berkeley County Urban No 14.6 (11.8, 18.0) 36 (13, 44) 20 falling falling trend -7.5 (-29.7, -1.4)
Kanawha County Urban No 16.2 (14.0, 18.7) 28 (12, 40) 42 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -1.0)
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 11:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top