Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Virginia by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Dinwiddie County Urban No 11.5 (7.0, 18.1) 91 (15, 104) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.5, -1.7)
Chesapeake City Urban No 11.6 (9.8, 13.7) 90 (50, 103) 30 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.9, -2.8)
Loudoun County Urban No 10.0 (8.6, 11.6) 99 (73, 104) 38 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -1.9)
Spotsylvania County Urban No 10.8 (8.5, 13.4) 97 (52, 104) 17 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.8)
Albemarle County Urban No 10.0 (7.9, 12.6) 100 (58, 104) 16 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.8)
York County Urban No 10.8 (7.9, 14.6) 96 (37, 104) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.1)
Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City Rural No 12.4 (7.5, 20.9) 84 (10, 104) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -0.5)
Clarke County Urban No 15.2 (8.8, 25.3) 48 (3, 104) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.1, -0.4)
Isle of Wight County Urban No 14.2 (9.9, 19.9) 62 (11, 104) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.7)
Winchester City Urban No 12.1 (7.5, 18.6) 87 (16, 104) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.9, -0.7)
Stafford County Urban No 11.3 (8.8, 14.2) 93 (41, 104) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.0)
Suffolk City Urban No 13.2 (10.3, 16.7) 75 (25, 103) 14 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Salem City Urban No 14.6 (9.6, 21.8) 54 (6, 104) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.9)
Louisa County Rural No 15.0 (10.5, 20.9) 50 (9, 103) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.3)
Gloucester County Urban No 12.6 (8.9, 17.7) 82 (21, 104) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.4)
Hampton City Urban No 14.9 (12.3, 18.0) 52 (20, 93) 24 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -1.2)
Montgomery County Urban No 12.2 (9.2, 15.8) 86 (29, 104) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Pittsylvania County Rural No 12.9 (10.0, 16.7) 78 (26, 103) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.2)
Fairfax County Urban No 8.9 (8.2, 9.7) 103 (92, 104) 114 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.8)
Lee County Rural No 9.4 (5.4, 15.9) 102 (28, 104) 3 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.5)
Hanover County Urban No 12.4 (10.0, 15.2) 85 (36, 102) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Nottoway County Rural No 16.9 (9.9, 27.4) 36 (2, 104) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.8, 1.2)
Virginia Beach City Urban No 11.1 (9.9, 12.5) 95 (65, 101) 58 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Arlington County Urban Yes 8.7 (7.0, 10.7) 104 (78, 104) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Westmoreland County Rural No 15.9 (9.7, 25.2) 43 (3, 104) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Culpeper County Urban No 13.7 (9.9, 18.5) 67 (17, 104) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.0)
Fluvanna County Urban No 10.4 (6.2, 16.7) 98 (21, 104) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.5)
Harrisonburg City Urban No 11.2 (7.0, 17.0) 94 (18, 104) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.2)
Nelson County Urban No 16.7 (9.9, 27.3) 38 (3, 104) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 0.8)
Pulaski County Urban No 13.7 (9.5, 19.4) 68 (12, 104) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.7)
Richmond City Urban No 13.4 (11.3, 15.8) 73 (33, 98) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.8)
Rockingham County Urban No 12.7 (9.9, 16.0) 81 (27, 102) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.3)
Chesterfield County Urban No 13.2 (11.6, 15.0) 74 (38, 93) 53 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Frederick County Urban No 13.7 (10.8, 17.1) 69 (26, 100) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.3)
Norfolk City Urban No 13.7 (11.6, 16.1) 66 (30, 95) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Portsmouth City Urban No 16.7 (13.4, 20.6) 39 (10, 85) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Warren County Urban No 13.1 (8.8, 18.7) 76 (13, 104) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 1.7)
Amherst County Urban No 17.0 (12.1, 23.5) 34 (4, 100) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 0.7)
Bedford City and County Urban No 13.4 (10.7, 16.8) 72 (26, 100) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 1.0)
Henrico County Urban No 14.0 (12.4, 15.8) 63 (34, 86) 57 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Newport News City Urban No 15.0 (12.6, 17.7) 49 (21, 90) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Russell County Rural No 14.4 (9.5, 21.3) 58 (9, 104) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.3)
Wise County Rural No 21.1 (15.4, 28.4) 16 (2, 81) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Lancaster County Rural No 18.8 (9.1, 35.4) 22 (1, 104) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.3, 3.2)
Washington County Urban No 12.6 (9.4, 16.7) 83 (24, 104) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Campbell County Urban No 15.9 (12.2, 20.6) 42 (10, 96) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.5)
Goochland County Urban No 14.3 (9.1, 21.9) 59 (6, 104) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.5)
Brunswick County Rural No 21.3 (13.7, 32.4) 14 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.5)
Roanoke City Urban No 17.8 (14.6, 21.4) 30 (8, 75) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.4)
Accomack County Rural No 14.7 (10.2, 21.0) 53 (7, 104) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Prince William County Urban No 12.9 (11.3, 14.6) 79 (44, 95) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.2)
Augusta County Urban No 14.3 (11.3, 17.9) 60 (20, 98) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Prince Edward County Rural No 19.3 (11.8, 29.9) 20 (1, 104) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.2)
Botetourt County Urban No 17.6 (12.3, 24.6) 31 (3, 100) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.4)
Fauquier County Urban No 14.9 (11.6, 19.0) 51 (14, 98) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.4)
Halifax County with South Boston City Rural No 19.5 (14.5, 25.9) 19 (3, 88) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 1.9)
King William County Urban No 19.2 (11.5, 30.3) 21 (1, 103) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.6)
Mecklenburg County Rural No 17.5 (12.1, 24.7) 33 (4, 101) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Prince George County Urban No 14.3 (9.6, 20.4) 61 (10, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.4)
Petersburg City Urban No 18.0 (12.5, 25.0) 29 (3, 100) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 6.5)
Colonial Heights City Urban No 21.3 (13.6, 32.0) 15 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.5)
Hopewell City Urban No 24.3 (16.1, 35.3) 5 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.6, 3.1)
Carroll County Rural No 16.5 (11.9, 22.8) 40 (5, 101) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Charlotte County Rural No 22.1 (12.1, 37.4) 10 (1, 104) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 2.6)
Lynchburg City Urban No 14.5 (10.9, 18.9) 57 (14, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Page County Rural No 15.3 (10.2, 22.7) 47 (6, 104) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.2)
Charlottesville City Urban No 13.8 (9.2, 20.0) 65 (9, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Henry County Rural No 15.7 (11.7, 20.8) 46 (9, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.4)
Waynesboro City Urban No 18.5 (11.9, 27.6) 26 (2, 103) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.1)
Buchanan County Rural No 21.8 (15.0, 31.1) 12 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Grayson County Rural No 18.0 (11.2, 28.5) 28 (2, 104) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.0)
Scott County Urban No 15.8 (10.2, 24.0) 45 (5, 104) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.0)
Smyth County Rural No 18.8 (13.4, 25.9) 23 (3, 97) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.7)
Staunton City Urban No 22.5 (15.8, 31.4) 8 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.8)
Danville City Rural No 26.3 (20.7, 33.0) 4 (1, 35) 16 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.5)
Martinsville City Rural No 21.8 (12.7, 35.3) 11 (1, 104) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 5.3)
Tazewell County Rural No 20.5 (15.4, 26.9) 18 (3, 75) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.3)
Orange County Rural No 18.7 (13.8, 25.1) 24 (3, 90) 10 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.7, 19.9)
Rockbridge County Rural No 21.5 (14.4, 31.2) 13 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.6, 23.1)
Alexandria City Urban No 11.7 (9.3, 14.5) 89 (39, 103) 17 stable stable trend 3.7 (-17.4, 29.6)
Shenandoah County Rural No 18.1 (13.7, 23.7) 27 (5, 86) 12 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.1, 24.6)
Fairfax City Urban No 29.4 (20.6, 40.6) 3 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 7.9 (-0.9, 34.4)
Roanoke County Urban No 11.4 (9.1, 14.3) 92 (41, 104) 17 stable stable trend 10.2 (-1.9, 20.2)
Franklin County Urban No 13.5 (10.0, 17.9) 71 (20, 103) 11 stable stable trend 10.6 (-3.1, 20.2)
Wythe County Rural No 18.7 (13.3, 26.0) 25 (3, 98) 8 rising rising trend 22.1 (1.6, 38.2)
Appomattox County Urban No 20.7 (13.0, 31.7) 17 (1, 103) 4 stable stable trend 29.2 (-0.1, 61.3)
Patrick County Rural No 12.8 (7.7, 21.0) 80 (7, 104) 4 stable stable trend 29.4 (-1.5, 56.2)
Manassas City Urban No 16.2 (10.3, 24.2) 41 (3, 104) 5 stable stable trend 31.6 (-3.2, 67.3)
Buckingham County Rural No 16.9 (10.4, 26.8) 35 (3, 104) 4
*
*
Caroline County Rural No 16.8 (11.5, 24.0) 37 (4, 102) 6
*
*
Dickenson County Rural No 15.9 (9.2, 26.4) 44 (3, 104) 3
*
*
Essex County Rural No 22.3 (12.0, 38.4) 9 (1, 104) 3
*
*
Floyd County Urban No 13.5 (7.4, 23.3) 70 (5, 104) 3
*
*
Franklin City Rural No 35.6 (20.8, 57.5) 1 (1, 86) 3
*
*
Fredericksburg City Urban No 14.5 (8.2, 23.6) 55 (4, 104) 3
*
*
Giles County Urban No 22.6 (14.6, 34.0) 7 (1, 98) 5
*
*
Greensville County Rural No 29.5 (16.5, 48.8) 2 (1, 97) 3
*
*
James City County Urban No 11.8 (9.4, 14.8) 88 (40, 103) 17
*
*
Lunenburg County Rural No 17.5 (10.0, 29.6) 32 (2, 104) 3
*
*
New Kent County Urban No 13.0 (7.6, 21.0) 77 (8, 104) 4
*
*
Northumberland County Rural No 14.5 (9.0, 25.2) 56 (6, 104) 4
*
*
Powhatan County Urban No 9.6 (5.7, 15.4) 101 (27, 104) 4
*
*
Richmond County Rural No 22.9 (13.1, 38.5) 6 (1, 104) 3
*
*
Southampton County Rural No 13.9 (8.5, 22.4) 64 (8, 104) 4
*
*
Amelia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bath County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bristol City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buena Vista City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charles City County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emporia City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls Church City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Galax City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King George County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King and Queen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lexington City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manassas Park City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mathews County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Middlesex County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton City Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Poquoson City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Radford City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rappahannock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Surry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sussex County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Williamsburg City Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 1:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top