Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa N/A No 13.3 (12.8, 13.8) N/A 552 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,648 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
Allamakee County Rural No 21.6 (13.5, 33.5) 4 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Appanoose County Rural No 16.6 (9.7, 27.8) 14 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 2.5)
Benton County Urban No 11.4 (6.6, 18.6) 48 (6, 55) 3
*
*
Black Hawk County Urban No 12.2 (9.9, 15.1) 44 (16, 54) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Boone County Urban No 15.2 (9.8, 22.8) 24 (2, 55) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.3)
Bremer County Urban No 13.0 (7.9, 20.4) 37 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.9)
Buchanan County Rural No 15.9 (9.6, 25.1) 17 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.4)
Buena Vista County Rural No 16.5 (9.8, 26.1) 15 (1, 55) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.7, -0.1)
Butler County Rural No 15.5 (9.1, 25.6) 20 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.9)
Carroll County Rural No 16.7 (10.7, 25.2) 13 (1, 54) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.3, -1.0)
Cerro Gordo County Rural No 11.0 (7.5, 15.8) 49 (13, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Cherokee County Rural No 20.1 (11.2, 33.9) 6 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.3, 2.7)
Clayton County Rural No 17.7 (11.9, 26.4) 9 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.2)
Clinton County Rural No 13.7 (10.1, 18.5) 32 (7, 54) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.3)
Crawford County Rural No 13.8 (7.8, 23.1) 31 (2, 55) 3
*
*
Dallas County Urban No 10.2 (7.6, 13.5) 52 (23, 55) 10 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.6, -1.1)
Delaware County Rural No 12.7 (7.3, 21.1) 40 (4, 55) 3 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -1.5)
Des Moines County Rural No 17.7 (12.7, 24.1) 10 (1, 48) 9 rising rising trend 27.2 (3.2, 43.1)
Dickinson County Rural No 15.9 (9.7, 25.2) 18 (2, 55) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.6, -1.3)
Dubuque County Urban No 12.5 (9.8, 15.8) 42 (14, 54) 16 stable stable trend 4.8 (-1.5, 23.7)
Emmet County Rural No 23.7 (13.6, 39.6) 2 (1, 53) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.8)
Fayette County Rural No 12.6 (7.4, 20.5) 41 (4, 55) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.4)
Greene County Rural No 26.4 (15.2, 43.7) 1 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 5.3)
Harrison County Urban No 17.1 (10.1, 27.7) 12 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural No 15.4 (9.3, 24.4) 21 (2, 55) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.7, -0.8)
Jasper County Urban No 12.8 (8.9, 17.9) 38 (9, 55) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 10.1 (5.6, 18.1) 53 (10, 55) 3
*
*
Johnson County Urban Yes 8.6 (6.6, 11.1) 55 (39, 55) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.1)
Jones County Urban No 12.1 (7.0, 19.9) 45 (4, 55) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.0)
Lee County Rural No 15.3 (10.8, 21.3) 22 (3, 53) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Linn County Urban No 11.0 (9.3, 12.9) 50 (27, 54) 31 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Madison County Urban No 22.5 (14.0, 34.6) 3 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.7)
Mahaska County Rural No 16.2 (9.9, 25.1) 16 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.8)
Marion County Rural No 17.6 (12.6, 24.2) 11 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-19.2, 0.4)
Marshall County Rural No 10.1 (6.7, 14.9) 54 (18, 55) 5 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.7, -4.5)
Mitchell County Rural No 20.3 (11.6, 33.9) 5 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Muscatine County Rural No 13.1 (9.2, 18.4) 36 (7, 55) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.4)
O'Brien County Rural No 14.4 (7.7, 25.1) 26 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 3.4)
Page County Rural No 14.1 (8.2, 23.6) 29 (2, 55) 3
*
*
Plymouth County Rural No 15.7 (10.4, 23.1) 19 (2, 54) 5
*
*
Polk County Urban No 13.5 (12.1, 15.0) 34 (17, 45) 69 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Pottawattamie County Urban No 15.2 (12.2, 18.8) 23 (6, 47) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.9)
Poweshiek County Rural No 13.5 (8.3, 21.4) 33 (3, 55) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.1, -0.3)
Scott County Urban No 11.5 (9.5, 13.7) 47 (22, 54) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.0)
Sioux County Rural No 10.9 (7.1, 16.1) 51 (12, 55) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.4, 0.3)
Story County Urban No 12.3 (9.2, 16.1) 43 (12, 55) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Tama County Rural No 14.1 (8.4, 22.9) 28 (2, 55) 3 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 0.9)
Union County Rural No 20.0 (11.6, 33.0) 7 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.2)
Wapello County Rural No 14.8 (10.1, 20.9) 25 (3, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.0)
Warren County Urban No 14.0 (10.1, 18.9) 30 (6, 54) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Washington County Urban No 11.9 (7.0, 19.2) 46 (6, 55) 4
*
*
Webster County Rural No 12.7 (8.4, 18.6) 39 (6, 55) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.0)
Winnebago County Rural No 19.2 (10.5, 33.2) 8 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Winneshiek County Rural No 14.3 (8.6, 22.8) 27 (2, 55) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.1)
Woodbury County Urban No 13.4 (10.6, 16.7) 35 (11, 52) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.3)
Adair County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cedar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guthrie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keokuk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kossuth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Alto County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wright County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 10:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top