Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia N/A No 16.6 (15.8, 17.3) N/A 424 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,648 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
Putnam County Urban No 12.9 (9.5, 17.3) 44 (16, 44) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
Hancock County Urban No 13.2 (8.8, 19.5) 43 (10, 44) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.8, -0.1)
Nicholas County Rural No 13.8 (8.8, 20.9) 42 (6, 44) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.1)
Monongalia County Urban No 13.8 (10.7, 17.6) 41 (14, 44) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 6.6)
Preston County Urban No 13.8 (9.3, 20.0) 40 (7, 44) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Ohio County Urban No 13.9 (9.9, 19.1) 39 (9, 44) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.7)
Jefferson County Urban No 14.2 (10.6, 18.8) 38 (11, 44) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.6)
Mason County Rural No 14.6 (9.5, 21.8) 37 (5, 44) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.2)
Berkeley County Urban No 14.6 (11.8, 18.0) 36 (13, 44) 20 falling falling trend -7.5 (-29.7, -1.4)
Jackson County Rural No 14.8 (9.8, 21.7) 35 (5, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.7)
Cabell County Urban No 14.9 (12.0, 18.4) 34 (12, 44) 18 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.1)
Raleigh County Urban No 15.1 (12.0, 18.9) 33 (11, 44) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Brooke County Urban No 15.4 (10.4, 22.6) 32 (5, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 15.7)
Harrison County Rural No 15.9 (12.4, 20.2) 31 (8, 44) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.3)
Mineral County Rural No 15.9 (10.9, 22.9) 30 (3, 44) 6 stable stable trend 13.7 (-2.3, 27.0)
Greenbrier County Rural No 16.1 (11.6, 22.2) 29 (5, 44) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Kanawha County Urban No 16.2 (14.0, 18.7) 28 (12, 40) 42 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -1.0)
Wood County Urban No 16.3 (13.1, 20.0) 27 (8, 43) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Hardy County Rural No 16.3 (9.2, 27.5) 26 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Upshur County Rural No 16.8 (11.1, 24.7) 25 (3, 44) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.9, -0.2)
Taylor County Rural No 16.9 (10.3, 26.8) 24 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Mercer County Rural No 17.0 (13.2, 21.7) 23 (6, 43) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Monroe County Rural No 17.0 (10.1, 28.2) 22 (1, 44) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 3.6)
Braxton County Rural No 17.1 (10.2, 28.2) 21 (1, 44) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.3)
Marion County Rural No 17.3 (13.3, 22.2) 20 (4, 43) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Marshall County Urban No 17.4 (12.4, 24.2) 19 (2, 44) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.2)
Morgan County Urban No 17.6 (10.2, 28.7) 18 (1, 44) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.7)
Roane County Rural No 17.6 (10.0, 29.4) 17 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Wayne County Urban No 18.0 (13.1, 24.3) 16 (2, 43) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.7, 17.9)
Fayette County Urban No 19.2 (14.5, 25.2) 15 (2, 41) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.0)
Summers County Rural No 19.3 (11.6, 31.8) 14 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Boone County Urban No 19.7 (13.2, 28.8) 13 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 1.3)
Randolph County Rural No 20.2 (14.4, 28.0) 12 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Lincoln County Rural No 20.4 (13.4, 30.1) 11 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.9)
Wyoming County Rural No 21.0 (14.2, 30.3) 10 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.4, 1.5)
Logan County Rural No 21.0 (15.3, 28.4) 9 (1, 40) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Hampshire County Urban No 21.4 (14.6, 30.6) 8 (1, 43) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.6)
Mingo County Rural No 21.6 (14.8, 30.7) 7 (1, 42) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.2)
Pocahontas County Rural No 22.0 (12.3, 38.7) 6 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Wetzel County Rural No 22.2 (13.8, 34.5) 5 (1, 44) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.4)
McDowell County Rural No 23.1 (15.7, 33.5) 4 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.7)
Lewis County Rural No 23.3 (15.0, 34.9) 3 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 9.1)
Barbour County Rural No 23.7 (15.2, 35.8) 2 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.0)
Ritchie County Rural No 26.3 (15.0, 44.4) 1 (1, 44) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.4)
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 7:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top