Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A No 16.5 (16.0, 17.0) N/A 917 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 2.1)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,648 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
Adair County Rural No 18.2 (11.7, 27.6) 47 (4, 86) 5
*
*
Allen County Urban No 13.7 (8.4, 21.5) 79 (17, 86) 4
*
*
Anderson County Rural No 15.1 (9.3, 23.4) 69 (10, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Barren County Rural No 20.6 (15.5, 26.9) 32 (5, 78) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.3)
Bath County Rural No 23.7 (14.1, 37.8) 15 (1, 86) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.4, 1.4)
Bell County Rural No 23.3 (16.4, 32.4) 18 (2, 79) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.5)
Boone County Urban No 11.8 (9.4, 14.6) 83 (55, 86) 17 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.4)
Bourbon County Urban No 16.5 (10.4, 25.3) 59 (6, 86) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.8)
Boyd County Urban No 17.7 (13.5, 23.1) 51 (11, 83) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.3)
Boyle County Rural No 15.0 (10.2, 21.6) 71 (17, 86) 6 falling falling trend -23.6 (-42.2, -2.8)
Breathitt County Rural No 20.4 (12.0, 33.1) 34 (1, 86) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.4)
Breckinridge County Rural No 15.1 (9.4, 23.4) 70 (12, 86) 4
*
*
Bullitt County Urban No 17.1 (13.6, 21.4) 54 (19, 82) 16 rising rising trend 21.4 (8.2, 29.7)
Caldwell County Rural No 18.7 (10.9, 30.7) 46 (2, 86) 3
*
*
Calloway County Rural No 13.8 (9.1, 20.2) 77 (21, 86) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.0)
Campbell County Urban No 12.4 (9.6, 15.7) 82 (49, 86) 14 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.7, -2.5)
Carter County Urban No 25.9 (18.9, 34.8) 9 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.4)
Casey County Rural No 18.0 (10.9, 28.7) 48 (4, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.4)
Christian County Urban No 17.2 (12.9, 22.4) 53 (15, 84) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.0)
Clark County Urban No 23.9 (18.1, 31.2) 14 (2, 67) 11
*
*
Clay County Rural No 30.6 (21.4, 42.6) 3 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.6)
Clinton County Rural No 26.9 (15.7, 44.0) 6 (1, 86) 3
*
*
Daviess County Urban No 14.9 (12.0, 18.3) 73 (34, 85) 19 stable stable trend 14.4 (-2.1, 27.8)
Edmonson County Urban No 19.8 (11.3, 32.9) 36 (2, 86) 3
*
*
Fayette County Urban No 11.5 (9.9, 13.3) 85 (67, 86) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Fleming County Rural No 20.9 (13.0, 32.3) 31 (1, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 1.0)
Floyd County Rural No 20.9 (15.1, 28.3) 29 (4, 80) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.1)
Franklin County Rural No 15.5 (11.4, 20.6) 66 (19, 86) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Garrard County Rural No 20.9 (13.2, 31.8) 30 (2, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 2.3)
Grant County Urban No 14.6 (8.8, 22.9) 75 (10, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.3)
Graves County Rural No 13.1 (9.0, 18.7) 81 (27, 86) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -1.4)
Grayson County Rural No 22.2 (15.4, 31.2) 23 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.6)
Greenup County Urban No 16.1 (11.6, 22.1) 62 (13, 86) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Hardin County Urban No 18.0 (14.7, 21.7) 50 (18, 78) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Harlan County Rural No 25.6 (18.7, 34.5) 10 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.1)
Harrison County Rural No 23.7 (16.0, 34.2) 16 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.4)
Hart County Rural No 18.8 (11.7, 28.9) 45 (3, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.3)
Henderson County Rural No 17.4 (12.8, 23.2) 52 (12, 85) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Henry County Urban No 19.3 (11.5, 30.7) 42 (2, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.1)
Hopkins County Rural No 16.2 (11.7, 21.9) 61 (16, 86) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 13.8 (12.7, 14.9) 78 (59, 82) 130 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.6)
Jessamine County Urban No 10.8 (7.5, 15.2) 86 (49, 86) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.9)
Johnson County Rural No 19.9 (13.0, 29.5) 35 (3, 85) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Kenton County Urban No 16.5 (14.0, 19.4) 58 (28, 79) 31 stable stable trend 7.8 (-2.7, 15.6)
Knox County Rural No 24.3 (17.8, 32.7) 13 (1, 71) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 4.0)
Laurel County Rural No 19.5 (15.1, 24.8) 41 (9, 78) 14 stable stable trend 15.2 (-1.6, 29.5)
Lawrence County Urban No 24.4 (15.3, 37.1) 12 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Leslie County Rural No 26.5 (16.1, 42.1) 8 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Letcher County Rural No 19.2 (12.8, 28.3) 43 (4, 86) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Lewis County Rural No 23.4 (14.0, 37.1) 17 (1, 86) 4
*
*
Lincoln County Rural No 25.1 (17.9, 34.5) 11 (1, 73) 8 stable stable trend 19.3 (-0.1, 37.7)
Logan County Rural No 22.8 (16.5, 30.9) 21 (2, 78) 9 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.1, 29.7)
Madison County Rural No 16.4 (13.0, 20.5) 60 (22, 84) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.8)
Magoffin County Rural No 22.9 (13.0, 37.8) 20 (1, 86) 3
*
*
Marion County Rural No 21.6 (14.1, 31.8) 26 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.3)
Marshall County Rural No 15.5 (11.0, 21.5) 67 (16, 86) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Mason County Rural No 19.6 (12.2, 30.1) 40 (3, 86) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.4)
McCracken County Urban No 11.6 (8.6, 15.4) 84 (52, 86) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
McCreary County Rural No 21.8 (13.7, 33.3) 24 (1, 86) 4
*
*
Meade County Urban No 14.7 (9.6, 21.9) 74 (14, 86) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.7)
Mercer County Rural No 20.5 (13.9, 29.4) 33 (3, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.8)
Monroe County Rural No 28.6 (17.9, 44.1) 5 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.7, 6.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 19.7 (13.5, 28.0) 38 (4, 85) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.3)
Morgan County Rural No 23.1 (13.8, 36.7) 19 (1, 86) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 3.6)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 17.1 (11.9, 23.9) 55 (10, 86) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.6)
Nelson County Urban No 22.7 (17.2, 29.4) 22 (3, 73) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.6)
Ohio County Rural No 18.0 (11.9, 26.4) 49 (6, 86) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Oldham County Urban No 15.6 (11.7, 20.4) 64 (21, 86) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-4.8, 0.2)
Pendleton County Urban No 21.3 (12.2, 34.6) 28 (1, 86) 3
*
*
Perry County Rural No 32.1 (24.1, 42.1) 2 (1, 39) 11 rising rising trend 10.8 (0.2, 33.5)
Pike County Rural No 21.3 (17.0, 26.7) 27 (6, 69) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Powell County Rural No 30.4 (18.0, 48.1) 4 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.5)
Pulaski County Rural No 16.0 (12.4, 20.4) 63 (22, 85) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.6)
Rockcastle County Rural No 26.6 (17.4, 39.3) 7 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 25.6 (-0.7, 52.9)
Rowan County Rural No 14.9 (8.9, 23.6) 72 (10, 86) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.6)
Russell County Rural No 18.9 (11.5, 29.5) 44 (3, 86) 4
*
*
Scott County Urban No 13.5 (9.3, 18.9) 80 (27, 86) 7
*
*
Shelby County Urban No 15.5 (11.0, 21.3) 65 (17, 86) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Simpson County Rural No 19.7 (12.3, 30.1) 39 (2, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.2)
Taylor County Rural No 19.8 (13.5, 28.2) 37 (4, 86) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Todd County Rural No 21.8 (12.2, 36.2) 25 (1, 86) 3
*
*
Warren County Urban No 16.8 (13.8, 20.3) 56 (24, 80) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 14.3 (8.8, 22.5) 76 (14, 86) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 4.1)
Whitley County Rural No 16.7 (11.6, 23.5) 57 (11, 86) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-23.9, 2.0)
Wolfe County Rural No 36.6 (20.3, 61.7) 1 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Woodford County Urban No 15.3 (9.9, 22.7) 68 (11, 86) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.8)
Ballard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Estill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Larue County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLean County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Metcalfe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trigg County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top