Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A No 10.9 (10.7, 11.1) N/A 2,807 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.1, -2.5)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,648 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
Albany County Urban No 11.6 (10.1, 13.2) 41 (15, 56) 48 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.6)
Allegany County Rural No 14.1 (10.2, 19.1) 15 (1, 60) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.6)
Bronx County Urban No 10.5 (9.8, 11.3) 48 (32, 56) 161 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.8, -4.1)
Broome County Urban No 12.9 (11.0, 15.0) 21 (7, 51) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.6)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 12.3 (9.4, 15.9) 31 (4, 61) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -1.2)
Cayuga County Rural No 9.6 (7.1, 12.8) 55 (15, 61) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.6)
Chautauqua County Rural No 12.7 (10.4, 15.4) 25 (6, 56) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.2)
Chemung County Urban No 12.1 (9.4, 15.5) 35 (5, 60) 14 stable stable trend 14.7 (-4.0, 28.7)
Chenango County Rural No 17.6 (13.2, 23.2) 3 (1, 49) 11 stable stable trend 20.4 (-2.0, 37.9)
Clinton County Rural No 16.5 (13.1, 20.6) 6 (1, 40) 17 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.2)
Columbia County Rural No 12.7 (9.7, 16.5) 26 (3, 60) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.3)
Cortland County Rural No 12.5 (8.6, 17.5) 29 (2, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 10.7)
Delaware County Rural No 11.9 (8.5, 16.5) 37 (4, 61) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -2.2)
Dutchess County Urban Yes 8.8 (7.5, 10.2) 60 (41, 61) 36 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.1, -3.8)
Erie County Urban No 12.2 (11.3, 13.1) 33 (16, 46) 157 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.7, 2.8)
Essex County Rural No 13.9 (9.9, 19.3) 16 (1, 60) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.9, -0.8)
Franklin County Rural No 15.3 (11.2, 20.7) 9 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.0)
Fulton County Rural No 12.8 (9.3, 17.2) 24 (2, 61) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.1, -2.6)
Genesee County Rural No 12.1 (8.9, 16.2) 34 (4, 61) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.3)
Greene County Rural No 15.0 (11.1, 20.0) 11 (1, 58) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.2)
Herkimer County Urban No 12.8 (9.6, 16.9) 22 (3, 60) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.9, 9.7)
Jefferson County Urban No 16.2 (13.1, 19.9) 7 (1, 39) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Kings County Urban No 10.4 (9.9, 10.9) 51 (38, 56) 312 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.3, -3.6)
Lewis County Rural No 19.2 (13.2, 27.2) 1 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.1, 0.0)
Livingston County Urban No 13.8 (10.4, 18.2) 17 (1, 59) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.3)
Madison County Urban No 14.1 (10.7, 18.4) 13 (1, 57) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.5)
Monroe County Urban No 11.7 (10.8, 12.8) 39 (19, 50) 117 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 5.5)
Montgomery County Rural No 10.5 (7.3, 14.8) 47 (7, 61) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.5, -1.2)
Nassau County Urban No 10.3 (9.7, 11.0) 52 (37, 56) 197 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.1, 2.4)
New York County Urban Yes 8.8 (8.2, 9.4) 59 (50, 61) 188 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.4, -3.3)
Niagara County Urban No 14.1 (12.2, 16.2) 14 (4, 41) 42 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.8, 18.5)
Oneida County Urban No 12.5 (10.8, 14.5) 28 (9, 53) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Onondaga County Urban No 10.8 (9.6, 12.0) 46 (24, 57) 66 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.6)
Ontario County Urban No 10.9 (8.8, 13.4) 45 (12, 61) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Orange County Urban No 12.2 (10.8, 13.8) 32 (12, 51) 54 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -2.0)
Orleans County Urban No 18.8 (13.9, 25.2) 2 (1, 41) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Oswego County Urban No 13.1 (10.6, 16.1) 20 (4, 57) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.3)
Otsego County Rural No 14.5 (11.0, 19.0) 12 (1, 55) 12 stable stable trend 18.1 (-1.6, 32.6)
Putnam County Urban No 11.6 (9.1, 14.7) 40 (8, 60) 15 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.7)
Queens County Urban No 9.6 (9.1, 10.1) 57 (45, 59) 290 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.2, -3.5)
Rensselaer County Urban No 10.3 (8.4, 12.6) 53 (17, 61) 21 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.2)
Richmond County Urban No 12.4 (11.1, 13.7) 30 (13, 48) 77 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -0.6)
Rockland County Urban No 9.6 (8.3, 11.1) 56 (33, 61) 39 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.0, 2.5)
Saratoga County Urban No 11.5 (9.9, 13.3) 42 (15, 57) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 7.5)
Schenectady County Urban No 10.5 (8.5, 12.8) 49 (16, 61) 21 rising rising trend 15.6 (3.4, 25.9)
Schoharie County Urban No 12.8 (8.4, 19.0) 23 (1, 61) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.1, -0.7)
Schuyler County Rural No 12.7 (7.3, 21.2) 27 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Seneca County Rural No 10.1 (6.3, 15.6) 54 (5, 61) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-6.2, -0.1)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 16.8 (13.9, 20.3) 4 (1, 32) 23 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.4, 19.9)
Steuben County Rural No 16.8 (13.8, 20.4) 5 (1, 34) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 10.1)
Suffolk County Urban No 11.2 (10.6, 11.9) 43 (26, 51) 228 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 2.8)
Sullivan County Rural No 12.1 (9.2, 15.6) 36 (5, 60) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Tioga County Urban No 11.1 (7.7, 15.5) 44 (5, 61) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.8, -1.0)
Tompkins County Urban Yes 7.6 (5.4, 10.3) 61 (36, 61) 8 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.2, -2.7)
Ulster County Urban No 13.2 (11.2, 15.5) 19 (6, 51) 34 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.9)
Warren County Urban No 10.4 (7.7, 13.9) 50 (10, 61) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.9, -1.2)
Washington County Urban No 15.6 (12.1, 19.8) 8 (1, 50) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 10.0)
Wayne County Urban No 13.3 (10.5, 16.5) 18 (3, 57) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Westchester County Urban No 9.1 (8.3, 9.8) 58 (47, 61) 125 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.1, -3.4)
Wyoming County Rural No 15.2 (10.9, 20.9) 10 (1, 58) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.7, -0.5)
Yates County Rural No 11.8 (7.2, 18.5) 38 (1, 61) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.7)
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top