Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Colon & Rectum, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas N/A No 15.5 (15.0, 16.1) N/A 591 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 3.5)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,648 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
Saline County Urban No 10.5 (8.4, 13.1) 57 (42, 57) 17 falling falling trend -9.8 (-19.8, -1.8)
Lonoke County Urban No 10.8 (7.8, 14.7) 56 (32, 57) 8 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.4, -3.1)
Logan County Rural No 11.8 (6.6, 19.8) 54 (12, 57) 3 stable stable trend -3.2 (-8.5, 0.8)
Baxter County Rural No 16.0 (11.9, 21.3) 37 (10, 55) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.9)
Benton County Urban No 11.2 (9.6, 13.1) 55 (42, 57) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Faulkner County Urban No 12.6 (10.0, 15.7) 50 (30, 57) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.8)
Hot Spring County Rural No 14.6 (10.1, 20.8) 48 (12, 57) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.4)
Hempstead County Rural No 19.5 (12.4, 29.4) 19 (2, 57) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.2, 1.1)
Miller County Urban No 15.1 (10.7, 20.7) 44 (10, 57) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.3)
Yell County Rural No 13.7 (8.2, 21.8) 49 (8, 57) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 0.6)
Conway County Rural No 12.0 (6.8, 19.9) 53 (13, 57) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 1.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 18.4 (14.5, 23.1) 25 (7, 49) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Sebastian County Urban No 15.6 (12.9, 18.8) 41 (18, 53) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Stone County Rural No 17.8 (10.4, 29.6) 29 (2, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.3)
Cleburne County Rural No 12.1 (7.6, 18.9) 51 (15, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 18.0 (10.8, 29.0) 27 (2, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 0.9)
St. Francis County Rural No 19.4 (12.7, 28.7) 20 (2, 56) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.0)
Madison County Urban No 18.9 (11.7, 29.5) 21 (2, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.9)
Mississippi County Rural No 24.0 (17.9, 31.5) 10 (1, 42) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.5)
Ouachita County Rural No 17.7 (11.2, 26.7) 31 (3, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 1.6)
Carroll County Rural No 15.9 (11.0, 22.5) 38 (8, 57) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.7)
Craighead County Urban No 17.1 (13.8, 20.9) 33 (11, 50) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
White County Rural No 16.9 (13.4, 21.2) 34 (10, 53) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Desha County Rural No 24.5 (14.5, 39.6) 8 (1, 57) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.0)
Clark County Rural No 15.7 (9.2, 25.2) 40 (4, 57) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 2.9)
Drew County Rural No 17.9 (10.7, 28.5) 28 (3, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.8, 2.7)
Garland County Urban No 15.1 (12.4, 18.3) 43 (19, 54) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Greene County Rural No 19.5 (14.6, 25.6) 18 (4, 51) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.0)
Jackson County Rural No 15.5 (8.9, 25.6) 42 (4, 57) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.1, 2.9)
Arkansas County Rural No 24.9 (16.7, 36.1) 7 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.0)
Boone County Rural No 16.3 (11.8, 22.2) 36 (9, 56) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Pope County Rural No 18.4 (14.2, 23.5) 24 (6, 50) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Phillips County Rural No 26.1 (16.7, 39.1) 4 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.1)
Crawford County Urban No 15.7 (12.0, 20.3) 39 (12, 56) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Little River County Urban No 19.8 (11.0, 33.4) 16 (1, 57) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.3, 4.5)
Marion County Rural No 16.4 (9.9, 26.3) 35 (4, 57) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.4)
Union County Rural No 18.7 (13.6, 25.2) 22 (5, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.6)
Ashley County Rural No 19.8 (13.0, 29.5) 15 (2, 56) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.8)
Monroe County Rural No 27.6 (15.5, 47.6) 3 (1, 56) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.0)
Sharp County Rural No 15.0 (9.6, 23.2) 45 (6, 57) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.7, 3.7)
Crittenden County Urban No 21.2 (16.0, 27.7) 14 (2, 47) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.8)
Fulton County Rural No 23.4 (14.1, 37.3) 12 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.8)
Lee County Rural No 37.3 (23.7, 57.1) 1 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.3)
Cross County Rural No 17.7 (10.8, 27.8) 30 (3, 57) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.4)
Lawrence County Rural No 22.2 (13.5, 34.5) 13 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 5.1)
Poinsett County Urban No 25.4 (17.8, 35.4) 6 (1, 44) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.3)
Johnson County Rural No 19.6 (12.9, 28.5) 17 (2, 56) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.9, 4.5)
Sevier County Rural No 18.3 (10.3, 30.2) 26 (1, 57) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.4)
Columbia County Rural No 24.1 (16.4, 34.3) 9 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 18.3)
Pulaski County Urban No 14.7 (13.1, 16.3) 47 (28, 51) 69 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.3, 10.5)
Washington County Urban No 12.1 (10.1, 14.3) 52 (37, 57) 28 stable stable trend 10.7 (-3.2, 21.8)
Independence County Rural No 18.6 (13.5, 25.0) 23 (4, 54) 9 stable stable trend 21.4 (-1.0, 42.1)
Cleveland County Rural No 25.6 (14.5, 43.8) 5 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Grant County Urban No 14.7 (8.5, 24.0) 46 (5, 57) 3
*
*
Izard County Rural No 17.1 (9.6, 28.8) 32 (3, 57) 3
*
*
Montgomery County Rural No 30.5 (17.2, 51.2) 2 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Randolph County Rural No 23.8 (16.1, 34.3) 11 (1, 53) 6
*
*
Bradley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 1:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top