Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Adams County Rural *** 6.6 (3.7, 12.5) 17 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Burnett County Rural *** 7.9 (4.4, 14.9) 4 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Waushara County Rural *** 6.5 (3.8, 11.4) 18 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Grant County Rural *** 4.6 (2.7, 7.6) 36 (6, 38) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
Langlade County Rural *** 9.3 (5.5, 15.8) 2 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Barron County Rural *** 6.0 (3.7, 9.5) 21 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Chippewa County Urban *** 4.8 (2.9, 7.4) 35 (5, 38) 4
*
*
Douglas County Urban *** 7.2 (4.5, 11.0) 8 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Marinette County Rural *** 6.8 (4.2, 10.8) 13 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Wood County Rural *** 4.1 (2.6, 6.2) 38 (13, 38) 4 falling falling trend -12.4 (-37.5, -1.9)
Waupaca County Rural *** 5.7 (3.6, 8.7) 25 (2, 38) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.7)
Oconto County Urban *** 8.0 (5.1, 12.3) 3 (1, 37) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 6.5)
Polk County Rural *** 6.9 (4.4, 10.5) 11 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 5.2)
St. Croix County Urban *** 4.5 (2.9, 6.8) 37 (8, 38) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.9)
Monroe County Rural *** 9.4 (6.2, 13.8) 1 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Columbia County Urban *** 7.0 (4.7, 10.2) 10 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 4.1)
Dodge County Rural *** 4.8 (3.2, 7.1) 34 (7, 38) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 5.5)
Portage County Rural *** 7.0 (4.7, 10.1) 9 (1, 37) 6 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.0, 7.3)
Sauk County Rural *** 6.3 (4.3, 9.2) 19 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.9)
Manitowoc County Rural *** 5.1 (3.5, 7.4) 29 (5, 38) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.6)
Eau Claire County Urban *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.7) 28 (4, 38) 7
*
*
Ozaukee County Urban *** 4.9 (3.4, 7.0) 31 (7, 38) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 4.2)
Fond du Lac County Urban *** 5.7 (4.1, 7.8) 24 (4, 38) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 5.6)
Sheboygan County Urban *** 5.0 (3.6, 6.9) 30 (8, 38) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 5.5)
Jefferson County Rural *** 7.4 (5.3, 10.1) 5 (1, 35) 8 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.2, 5.7)
Walworth County Rural *** 6.3 (4.6, 8.5) 20 (2, 37) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 5.3)
La Crosse County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 8.0) 22 (3, 38) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.8)
Marathon County Urban *** 5.6 (4.1, 7.4) 27 (5, 38) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 4.1)
Washington County Urban *** 6.7 (5.1, 8.6) 16 (2, 35) 12 rising rising trend 18.0 (2.2, 32.2)
Outagamie County Urban *** 5.8 (4.5, 7.4) 23 (5, 37) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.9, 5.3)
Kenosha County Urban *** 6.8 (5.3, 8.7) 12 (2, 34) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 5.1)
Winnebago County Urban *** 6.8 (5.3, 8.6) 14 (2, 33) 14 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.9, 6.8)
Rock County Urban *** 7.2 (5.6, 9.0) 7 (2, 30) 16 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.3)
Brown County Urban *** 5.6 (4.5, 7.0) 26 (8, 37) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.6)
Racine County Urban *** 6.8 (5.4, 8.4) 15 (2, 31) 18 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.7)
Waukesha County Urban *** 4.9 (4.1, 5.8) 33 (18, 38) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Dane County Urban *** 4.9 (4.1, 5.8) 32 (18, 38) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.5)
Milwaukee County Urban *** 7.2 (6.5, 8.0) 6 (3, 20) 78 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.4, 0.1)
Ashland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bayfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calumet County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Door County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Juneau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oneida County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sawyer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shawano County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trempealeau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vernon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vilas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 10:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top