Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Adams County Rural *** 11.7 (7.6, 17.5) 7 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Alcorn County Rural *** 10.2 (6.6, 15.2) 12 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Clay County Rural *** 14.1 (8.1, 23.2) 1 (1, 30) 3
*
*
DeSoto County Urban *** 7.0 (5.4, 8.9) 28 (14, 32) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.6)
Forrest County Urban *** 11.3 (8.2, 15.1) 9 (1, 26) 9 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 7.3)
George County Rural *** 12.8 (7.4, 20.7) 4 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Hancock County Urban *** 8.6 (5.8, 12.5) 18 (4, 31) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 3.1)
Harrison County Urban *** 10.7 (9.0, 12.7) 11 (3, 21) 28 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 4.1)
Hinds County Urban *** 6.5 (5.2, 8.1) 30 (17, 32) 18 falling falling trend -8.8 (-24.2, -0.3)
Itawamba County Rural *** 10.0 (5.7, 16.7) 13 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Jackson County Urban *** 8.9 (7.0, 11.1) 17 (6, 29) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 3.0)
Jones County Rural *** 7.0 (4.7, 10.2) 27 (9, 32) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.8)
Lamar County Urban *** 8.5 (5.7, 12.2) 20 (4, 32) 6
*
*
Lauderdale County Rural *** 4.4 (2.8, 6.7) 32 (24, 32) 4 stable stable trend -23.5 (-48.5, 1.2)
Lee County Rural *** 8.6 (6.2, 11.6) 19 (5, 31) 9
*
*
Lincoln County Rural *** 7.1 (4.1, 11.7) 26 (5, 32) 3
*
*
Lowndes County Rural *** 8.0 (5.3, 11.6) 22 (6, 32) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.1)
Madison County Urban *** 7.2 (5.2, 9.8) 25 (10, 32) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Marion County Rural *** 9.9 (5.6, 16.3) 14 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Marshall County Urban *** 8.1 (4.9, 13.0) 21 (3, 32) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 4.0)
Neshoba County Rural *** 14.0 (9.1, 20.8) 2 (1, 24) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 7.0)
Panola County Rural *** 7.7 (4.4, 12.7) 23 (4, 32) 3
*
*
Pearl River County Rural *** 11.6 (8.5, 15.6) 8 (1, 25) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.3, 5.8)
Pike County Rural *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.2) 29 (7, 32) 3 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.7)
Prentiss County Rural *** 9.8 (5.6, 16.3) 16 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Rankin County Urban *** 7.4 (5.8, 9.4) 24 (11, 31) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.9)
Scott County Urban *** 13.4 (8.3, 20.5) 3 (1, 29) 4
*
*
Simpson County Urban *** 9.8 (5.6, 16.3) 15 (1, 32) 3 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.9)
Sunflower County Rural *** 11.1 (6.4, 18.2) 10 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Tate County Urban *** 12.7 (8.1, 19.2) 5 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Tishomingo County Rural *** 12.1 (7.1, 19.9) 6 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Warren County Rural *** 5.8 (3.4, 9.4) 31 (13, 32) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.6)
Amite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bolivar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coahoma County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Copiah County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grenada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leflore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oktibbeha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pontotoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yazoo County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 12:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top