Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 6.8 (6.6, 7.0) N/A 940 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
United States N/A *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.7) N/A 28,750 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
Alamance County Urban *** 9.3 (7.6, 11.3) 15 (3, 45) 22 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.1, 4.6)
Alexander County Urban *** 6.5 (3.8, 10.8) 48 (3, 75) 3
*
*
Anson County Urban *** 14.4 (8.5, 22.9) 1 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Brunswick County Urban *** 6.2 (4.9, 7.8) 51 (19, 73) 20 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 6.4)
Buncombe County Urban *** 6.5 (5.5, 7.8) 46 (20, 69) 27 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.7)
Burke County Urban *** 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 65 (19, 75) 7 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 7.1)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 7.4 (6.0, 9.2) 32 (10, 67) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 5.5)
Caldwell County Urban *** 7.5 (5.5, 10.2) 31 (5, 73) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.6)
Catawba County Urban *** 6.3 (4.9, 8.1) 49 (17, 74) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 4.2)
Chatham County Urban *** 4.8 (3.3, 6.9) 74 (31, 75) 7
*
*
Cumberland County Urban *** 6.0 (4.8, 7.2) 56 (26, 73) 21 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.5)
Davidson County Urban *** 8.4 (6.9, 10.2) 19 (5, 53) 22 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.4, 5.8)
Davie County Urban *** 5.1 (3.0, 8.4) 71 (12, 75) 3
*
*
Durham County Urban *** 5.3 (4.3, 6.5) 66 (35, 75) 19 falling falling trend -7.0 (-19.6, -1.5)
Edgecombe County Urban *** 8.2 (5.6, 11.9) 23 (2, 74) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 4.3)
Forsyth County Urban *** 7.7 (6.6, 8.9) 28 (11, 55) 37 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 4.1)
Franklin County Urban *** 5.3 (3.4, 7.9) 68 (17, 75) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.8)
Gaston County Urban *** 10.5 (8.9, 12.3) 6 (1, 27) 31 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.0, 6.6)
Guilford County Urban *** 6.9 (6.0, 7.9) 41 (21, 60) 45 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.1, 4.9)
Henderson County Urban *** 6.0 (4.5, 7.9) 53 (20, 75) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.8)
Hoke County Urban *** 7.0 (3.9, 11.6) 37 (2, 75) 3
*
*
Iredell County Urban *** 5.0 (3.8, 6.5) 72 (35, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 4.1)
Johnston County Urban *** 5.6 (4.3, 7.1) 61 (26, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 2.5)
Lincoln County Urban *** 6.9 (5.0, 9.3) 42 (8, 75) 9
*
*
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 7.0 (6.3, 7.7) 38 (22, 57) 76 stable stable trend -8.2 (-17.2, 1.7)
Moore County Urban *** 5.2 (3.8, 7.1) 69 (26, 75) 9 stable stable trend -25.4 (-43.2, 0.2)
Nash County Urban *** 7.6 (5.7, 10.1) 30 (6, 72) 10 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 5.2)
New Hanover County Urban *** 5.6 (4.5, 7.0) 58 (30, 74) 18 stable stable trend -2.9 (-14.4, 0.4)
Onslow County Urban *** 7.4 (5.6, 9.6) 33 (7, 72) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 7.9)
Orange County Urban *** 4.9 (3.5, 6.7) 73 (33, 75) 8
*
*
Pender County Urban *** 4.7 (2.8, 7.6) 75 (21, 75) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.9)
Person County Urban *** 5.3 (3.0, 8.9) 67 (11, 75) 3
*
*
Pitt County Urban *** 6.0 (4.5, 7.8) 57 (19, 75) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.4, 5.0)
Randolph County Urban *** 8.4 (6.6, 10.5) 21 (5, 57) 17 rising rising trend 4.4 (3.0, 6.4)
Rockingham County Urban *** 5.1 (3.5, 7.2) 70 (24, 75) 7
*
*
Rowan County Urban *** 6.9 (5.4, 8.8) 40 (11, 73) 14 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.6)
Stokes County Urban *** 7.4 (4.9, 11.1) 34 (3, 75) 5
*
*
Union County Urban *** 6.1 (4.8, 7.7) 52 (21, 74) 16 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 5.5)
Wake County Urban *** 5.4 (4.8, 6.0) 64 (45, 73) 64 falling falling trend -11.1 (-18.4, -1.8)
Wayne County Urban *** 7.8 (5.9, 10.2) 26 (5, 69) 11 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.4, 6.3)
Yadkin County Urban *** 9.8 (6.5, 14.4) 11 (1, 72) 5 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.4, 8.7)
Ashe County Rural *** 6.8 (3.9, 11.8) 43 (3, 75) 3
*
*
Beaufort County Rural *** 9.1 (6.4, 13.0) 17 (1, 68) 7 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 6.5)
Bladen County Rural *** 9.8 (6.2, 15.3) 10 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Carteret County Rural *** 6.5 (4.7, 9.1) 47 (10, 75) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 4.0)
Cherokee County Rural *** 7.0 (3.5, 12.8) 39 (2, 75) 3
*
*
Cleveland County Rural *** 8.4 (6.3, 10.9) 20 (3, 64) 11 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.8, 7.0)
Columbus County Rural *** 6.7 (4.2, 10.2) 45 (4, 75) 4
*
*
Craven County Rural *** 8.2 (6.2, 10.7) 24 (4, 69) 11 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.1, 8.2)
Dare County Rural *** 5.6 (3.4, 9.3) 59 (9, 75) 4
*
*
Duplin County Rural *** 5.6 (3.4, 8.9) 60 (11, 75) 4
*
*
Granville County Rural *** 9.4 (6.8, 12.8) 14 (1, 66) 8
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 13.7 (7.9, 22.5) 2 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Halifax County Rural *** 8.3 (5.5, 12.1) 22 (2, 74) 6 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 6.0)
Harnett County Rural *** 7.7 (5.8, 10.1) 27 (6, 70) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 5.3)
Haywood County Rural *** 6.8 (4.8, 9.6) 44 (6, 75) 7 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.4, 5.9)
Jackson County Rural *** 6.3 (3.7, 10.3) 50 (4, 75) 3
*
*
Lee County Rural *** 5.6 (3.5, 8.5) 62 (13, 75) 4 falling falling trend -19.8 (-46.7, -0.4)
Lenoir County Rural *** 6.0 (3.8, 9.1) 55 (8, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 5.1)
Martin County Rural *** 8.7 (4.9, 15.1) 18 (1, 75) 3
*
*
McDowell County Rural *** 9.4 (6.4, 13.6) 13 (1, 69) 6
*
*
Mitchell County Rural *** 12.8 (7.5, 21.8) 3 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Montgomery County Rural *** 10.4 (6.4, 16.6) 8 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Richmond County Rural *** 11.3 (7.7, 16.1) 4 (1, 58) 6 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 7.5)
Robeson County Rural *** 9.7 (7.5, 12.3) 12 (2, 50) 13 rising rising trend 4.9 (3.0, 7.5)
Rutherford County Rural *** 10.5 (7.8, 13.9) 5 (1, 52) 11 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.8, 7.6)
Sampson County Rural *** 5.4 (3.4, 8.3) 63 (13, 75) 4
*
*
Scotland County Rural *** 9.2 (5.8, 14.1) 16 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Stanly County Rural *** 10.5 (7.7, 14.0) 7 (1, 49) 10 rising rising trend 5.6 (3.3, 9.2)
Surry County Rural *** 7.2 (5.1, 10.1) 36 (5, 74) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.9)
Transylvania County Rural *** 8.2 (4.9, 13.1) 25 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Vance County Rural *** 10.4 (7.1, 14.8) 9 (1, 64) 6 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.5, 8.0)
Watauga County Rural *** 6.0 (3.6, 9.6) 54 (8, 75) 4 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 6.8)
Wilkes County Rural *** 7.6 (5.4, 10.6) 29 (4, 73) 8 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.1, 9.7)
Wilson County Rural *** 7.3 (5.1, 10.0) 35 (6, 74) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.3)
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/31/2026 9:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top