Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Pancreas, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Carroll County Rural *** 7.8 (4.5, 12.9) 41 (14, 41) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 0.9)
Independence County Rural *** 7.9 (4.7, 12.4) 40 (14, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.1)
Saline County Urban *** 8.1 (6.3, 10.3) 39 (24, 41) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.6)
Washington County Urban *** 8.1 (6.6, 10.0) 38 (26, 41) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Sebastian County Urban *** 9.0 (7.0, 11.4) 37 (19, 41) 14 stable stable trend 14.7 (-0.7, 27.8)
Marion County Rural *** 9.1 (5.0, 16.5) 36 (6, 41) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.6)
Boone County Rural *** 9.3 (6.2, 13.7) 35 (10, 41) 5
*
*
Logan County Rural *** 9.7 (5.5, 16.4) 34 (4, 41) 3
*
*
Faulkner County Urban *** 9.7 (7.5, 12.5) 33 (14, 41) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.9)
Benton County Urban *** 9.7 (8.2, 11.4) 32 (18, 40) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-13.7, 1.5)
Crawford County Urban *** 9.8 (6.9, 13.5) 31 (9, 41) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.3)
Garland County Urban *** 10.7 (8.6, 13.2) 30 (11, 40) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Jefferson County Rural *** 10.9 (8.0, 14.7) 29 (7, 40) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Pope County Rural *** 11.2 (8.2, 15.1) 28 (6, 41) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 6.1)
Mississippi County Rural *** 11.3 (7.3, 16.7) 27 (4, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.5)
Conway County Rural *** 11.3 (6.4, 18.8) 26 (2, 41) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.7)
White County Rural *** 11.3 (8.5, 14.9) 25 (7, 40) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.3)
Craighead County Urban *** 11.6 (9.0, 14.7) 24 (7, 39) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.5)
Greene County Rural *** 12.3 (8.5, 17.2) 23 (3, 41) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.4)
Lonoke County Urban *** 12.8 (9.5, 16.8) 22 (3, 38) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.6)
Pulaski County Urban *** 12.8 (11.4, 14.3) 21 (8, 28) 62 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.8)
Miller County Urban *** 13.0 (9.0, 18.3) 20 (2, 40) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.4)
Baxter County Rural *** 13.1 (9.7, 17.7) 19 (3, 37) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.2)
Madison County Urban *** 13.2 (7.6, 21.9) 18 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Crittenden County Urban *** 13.4 (9.2, 18.8) 17 (2, 40) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.4)
Yell County Rural *** 13.5 (8.0, 21.6) 16 (1, 41) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.9)
Ashley County Rural *** 13.6 (8.2, 21.7) 15 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Cleburne County Rural *** 13.6 (9.1, 20.2) 14 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.7)
Sharp County Rural *** 13.7 (7.7, 23.0) 13 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.0, 6.2)
Van Buren County Rural *** 13.8 (7.9, 23.4) 12 (1, 41) 3 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.5, 5.8)
Hot Spring County Rural *** 13.9 (9.4, 20.0) 11 (1, 39) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.8)
St. Francis County Rural *** 14.6 (8.8, 22.9) 10 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.7)
Randolph County Rural *** 15.0 (8.9, 23.9) 9 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Izard County Rural *** 15.2 (9.0, 25.3) 8 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Poinsett County Urban *** 15.4 (9.7, 23.4) 7 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.4, 7.3)
Clay County Rural *** 15.6 (9.4, 25.3) 6 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Union County Rural *** 16.3 (11.7, 22.3) 5 (1, 32) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.7)
Ouachita County Rural *** 16.4 (10.5, 24.8) 4 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.3)
Jackson County Rural *** 18.4 (11.1, 29.0) 3 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.8)
Arkansas County Rural *** 19.1 (11.8, 29.5) 2 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Cross County Rural *** 20.5 (12.8, 31.5) 1 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Bradley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Desha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Drew County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hempstead County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top