Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Baxter County Rural No 48.8 (42.1, 56.5) 40 (13, 67) 43 falling falling trend -18.3 (-28.0, -3.6)
Union County Rural No 44.7 (36.9, 53.7) 53 (17, 73) 24 falling falling trend -9.8 (-29.3, -1.5)
Cross County Rural No 45.1 (33.7, 59.5) 51 (8, 75) 10 falling falling trend -9.7 (-29.5, -2.9)
Lonoke County Urban No 46.0 (39.7, 53.1) 48 (19, 69) 39 falling falling trend -9.0 (-18.0, -3.6)
Polk County Rural No 39.8 (30.8, 51.2) 68 (19, 75) 13 falling falling trend -8.9 (-22.0, -3.1)
Madison County Urban No 44.7 (33.7, 58.6) 52 (7, 75) 11 falling falling trend -7.5 (-20.8, -1.9)
Phillips County Rural No 49.1 (37.1, 64.3) 37 (3, 74) 12 falling falling trend -6.7 (-15.2, -4.1)
Benton County Urban No 32.7 (29.8, 35.7) 74 (65, 75) 100 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.9, -3.2)
Pope County Rural No 44.3 (38.0, 51.4) 55 (21, 72) 36 falling falling trend -4.6 (-10.8, -2.8)
Pulaski County Urban No 36.3 (34.0, 38.9) 73 (59, 74) 179 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.2, -3.3)
Washington County Urban No 30.0 (26.9, 33.3) 75 (69, 75) 72 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.8)
Faulkner County Urban No 40.3 (35.6, 45.5) 67 (39, 73) 54 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.0, -2.7)
Howard County Rural No 40.8 (28.5, 57.3) 65 (8, 75) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -2.1)
Conway County Rural No 43.8 (33.7, 56.3) 58 (10, 75) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-18.0, -1.0)
Prairie County Rural No 45.3 (31.3, 65.3) 49 (3, 75) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.0, -1.5)
Garland County Urban No 37.9 (33.8, 42.4) 71 (49, 74) 67 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -2.7)
Independence County Rural No 38.7 (31.5, 47.4) 70 (30, 75) 20 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.2)
Lafayette County Rural No 41.0 (26.1, 64.2) 64 (4, 75) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.6, -0.6)
Yell County Rural No 39.1 (29.4, 51.4) 69 (17, 75) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -1.1)
Drew County Rural No 41.7 (30.8, 55.6) 62 (10, 75) 10 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.3)
Newton County Rural No 37.5 (24.5, 57.6) 72 (11, 75) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.8, 0.0)
Searcy County Rural No 59.8 (43.1, 82.6) 12 (1, 71) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.9)
Woodruff County Rural No 44.7 (28.8, 68.5) 54 (2, 75) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.8, -0.2)
Grant County Urban No 50.5 (38.9, 65.0) 32 (3, 73) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-14.4, 1.3)
Sebastian County Urban No 42.8 (38.4, 47.6) 59 (33, 71) 70 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.5)
Perry County Urban No 53.1 (38.3, 72.9) 28 (1, 74) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.7)
Poinsett County Urban No 73.0 (60.1, 88.2) 1 (1, 28) 23 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -1.2)
Saline County Urban No 42.0 (37.7, 46.6) 61 (38, 71) 72 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.8, -1.5)
Arkansas County Rural No 50.1 (38.2, 64.8) 34 (2, 73) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.6)
Logan County Rural No 57.3 (46.1, 70.8) 19 (1, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.7)
White County Rural No 46.4 (40.6, 52.9) 46 (20, 69) 47 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Hot Spring County Rural No 50.5 (41.8, 60.7) 33 (6, 70) 24 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.8)
Lee County Rural No 40.8 (26.8, 60.9) 66 (5, 75) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.2)
Ouachita County Rural No 48.4 (38.4, 60.6) 41 (6, 73) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.3)
Crittenden County Urban No 55.3 (46.6, 65.1) 24 (3, 59) 30 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Hempstead County Rural No 54.2 (42.4, 68.5) 27 (1, 70) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.6)
Cleburne County Rural No 48.8 (40.4, 59.1) 39 (8, 71) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Dallas County Rural No 61.4 (42.2, 88.4) 8 (1, 73) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Little River County Urban No 46.2 (33.1, 63.6) 47 (3, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.1)
Miller County Urban No 48.9 (41.0, 58.0) 38 (10, 69) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Scott County Rural No 58.7 (42.6, 79.9) 15 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.5)
Bradley County Rural No 42.3 (28.3, 61.4) 60 (4, 75) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.4)
Crawford County Urban No 52.9 (45.9, 60.7) 29 (6, 60) 42 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Greene County Rural No 55.6 (47.4, 64.9) 22 (3, 57) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Van Buren County Rural No 48.1 (37.7, 61.4) 42 (5, 73) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.1)
Boone County Rural No 49.3 (41.4, 58.4) 36 (8, 68) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.4)
Carroll County Rural No 41.3 (33.4, 50.9) 63 (23, 75) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Columbia County Rural No 46.7 (36.3, 59.5) 44 (7, 74) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 44.3 (31.6, 62.7) 56 (4, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
St. Francis County Rural No 51.6 (40.5, 65.1) 31 (3, 71) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.1)
Desha County Rural No 45.2 (31.4, 63.7) 50 (3, 75) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.6)
Fulton County Rural No 55.1 (41.9, 72.1) 25 (1, 70) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4)
Monroe County Rural No 47.2 (31.1, 70.8) 43 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 0.7)
Ashley County Rural No 46.4 (36.3, 59.1) 45 (8, 74) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Izard County Rural No 60.1 (47.1, 76.5) 11 (1, 65) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 65.5 (51.3, 82.7) 4 (1, 57) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 49.6 (43.3, 56.8) 35 (13, 65) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Johnson County Rural No 58.8 (47.7, 72.0) 14 (1, 59) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Lawrence County Rural No 66.4 (52.1, 83.9) 2 (1, 54) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Mississippi County Rural No 62.7 (52.8, 74.1) 7 (1, 45) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Sevier County Rural No 44.1 (31.4, 60.4) 57 (5, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.0)
Franklin County Rural No 64.5 (51.3, 80.6) 5 (1, 54) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Marion County Rural No 56.6 (45.0, 71.0) 21 (1, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Clay County Rural No 57.5 (44.5, 73.6) 18 (1, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 57.9 (45.5, 73.0) 17 (1, 65) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Calhoun County Rural No 59.0 (36.5, 92.7) 13 (1, 75) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.2)
Pike County Rural No 65.7 (49.1, 87.2) 3 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Chicot County Rural No 61.2 (45.1, 82.1) 9 (1, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Sharp County Rural No 56.7 (45.7, 70.4) 20 (1, 63) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 64.4 (47.7, 85.6) 6 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Stone County Rural No 55.4 (43.2, 71.2) 23 (1, 70) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.3)
Cleveland County Rural No 54.8 (37.4, 78.9) 26 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.9)
Clark County Rural No 58.7 (46.3, 73.7) 16 (1, 65) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Craighead County Urban No 52.0 (46.3, 58.2) 30 (10, 57) 62 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 10.0)
Nevada County Rural No 60.7 (42.8, 84.9) 10 (1, 72) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 4.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top