Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Weld County Urban Yes 22.6 (20.3, 25.1) 22 (11, 27) 74 falling falling trend -9.9 (-17.6, -3.1)
La Plata County Rural Yes 14.9 (11.1, 19.8) 31 (22, 34) 11 falling falling trend -5.8 (-16.8, -3.5)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 20.4 (18.9, 21.9) 26 (18, 28) 148 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.3, -3.7)
Garfield County Rural Yes 17.3 (12.8, 22.9) 28 (14, 34) 10 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.0, -3.8)
Denver County Urban Yes 22.2 (20.6, 24.0) 23 (13, 26) 144 falling falling trend -4.8 (-12.4, -3.4)
Douglas County Urban Yes 15.6 (13.8, 17.5) 30 (26, 33) 57 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.2, -3.2)
Eagle County Rural Yes 10.8 (6.7, 16.3) 34 (27, 34) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.1, -0.1)
Routt County Rural Yes 11.5 (6.9, 18.4) 33 (25, 34) 4 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.0, -0.4)
Boulder County Urban Yes 16.5 (14.7, 18.5) 29 (25, 33) 62 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.1, -2.9)
Adams County Urban No 25.6 (23.5, 27.8) 13 (7, 21) 115 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.4, -3.1)
Arapahoe County Urban Yes 21.1 (19.6, 22.8) 25 (16, 27) 145 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -2.8)
Larimer County Urban Yes 18.6 (16.8, 20.6) 27 (21, 31) 81 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.1, -3.1)
Mesa County Urban No 26.4 (23.5, 29.7) 12 (5, 22) 61 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.5, -2.7)
Montrose County Rural No 27.4 (22.4, 33.5) 10 (3, 25) 21 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Morgan County Rural No 26.8 (19.8, 35.6) 11 (2, 29) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -1.2)
Park County Urban Yes 13.8 (7.5, 24.2) 32 (9, 34) 3 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.1, 0.8)
Montezuma County Rural Yes 25.1 (18.7, 33.3) 14 (2, 30) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Broomfield County Urban Yes 21.7 (17.5, 26.7) 24 (8, 30) 18 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.6, 0.0)
Elbert County Urban Yes 23.1 (15.8, 32.8) 20 (3, 33) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.1)
El Paso County Urban Yes 24.4 (22.8, 26.1) 17 (9, 22) 186 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.4)
Fremont County Rural No 31.4 (26.1, 37.8) 3 (1, 19) 25 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.3)
Logan County Rural No 28.8 (20.8, 39.3) 9 (1, 28) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.7)
Otero County Rural No 29.9 (21.9, 40.6) 6 (1, 27) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.3)
Chaffee County Rural Yes 23.9 (16.9, 33.5) 19 (3, 32) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.0)
Moffat County Rural No 29.1 (18.3, 44.3) 7 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.8)
Delta County Rural Yes 24.8 (19.1, 32.1) 15 (3, 29) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Pueblo County Urban No 31.4 (28.2, 34.8) 4 (2, 12) 75 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Las Animas County Rural No 29.0 (20.2, 41.3) 8 (1, 29) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Kit Carson County Rural No 30.7 (17.2, 51.9) 5 (1, 33) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 3.0)
Alamosa County Rural Yes 24.5 (15.3, 37.5) 16 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.7)
Teller County Urban Yes 24.2 (17.1, 33.8) 18 (2, 32) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 2.4)
Prowers County Rural No 44.9 (30.4, 64.2) 1 (1, 17) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
Archuleta County Rural Yes 22.8 (14.3, 35.7) 21 (2, 33) 4
*
*
Washington County Rural No 42.6 (24.2, 72.0) 2 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Baca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top