Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A No 41.6 (41.0, 42.2) N/A 3,578 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.6)
United States N/A No 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) N/A 134,731 falling falling trend -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Porter County Urban No 37.0 (33.5, 40.7) 77 (50, 89) 85 falling falling trend -11.2 (-15.6, -6.1)
Boone County Urban No 30.3 (25.1, 36.3) 90 (63, 92) 24 falling falling trend -6.9 (-19.3, -3.5)
Lake County Urban No 34.3 (32.3, 36.4) 86 (71, 90) 227 falling falling trend -6.4 (-12.2, -3.8)
Jackson County Rural No 43.7 (36.5, 52.1) 53 (11, 87) 26 falling falling trend -6.3 (-23.2, -2.7)
Hendricks County Urban No 34.8 (31.1, 38.7) 85 (59, 91) 69 falling falling trend -4.9 (-12.9, -2.5)
Hancock County Urban No 39.7 (34.5, 45.6) 69 (30, 88) 42 falling falling trend -4.4 (-11.5, -2.5)
Jay County Rural No 44.2 (33.9, 57.0) 51 (5, 90) 12 falling falling trend -4.3 (-17.9, -2.3)
Ripley County Rural No 34.0 (26.4, 43.3) 87 (37, 92) 14 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.3, -2.9)
Bartholomew County Urban No 40.1 (34.8, 46.0) 63 (27, 88) 42 falling falling trend -4.1 (-9.9, -2.5)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 23.8 (21.5, 26.2) 92 (89, 92) 85 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.5, -3.2)
Franklin County Urban No 39.3 (30.2, 50.6) 71 (10, 91) 13 falling falling trend -3.8 (-18.7, -1.3)
Marion County Urban No 44.7 (42.8, 46.7) 48 (30, 61) 441 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.4, -2.9)
White County Rural No 47.1 (37.7, 58.4) 38 (4, 87) 18 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.6, -2.4)
Madison County Urban No 48.4 (43.9, 53.2) 33 (12, 63) 89 falling falling trend -3.4 (-11.0, -1.7)
Warrick County Urban No 39.3 (33.7, 45.7) 70 (31, 89) 36 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.1)
Owen County Urban No 47.8 (37.5, 60.4) 36 (3, 89) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Posey County Urban No 29.4 (21.9, 38.9) 91 (49, 92) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.3)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 39.8 (36.3, 43.6) 68 (40, 85) 96 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.1)
Clark County Urban No 49.6 (44.7, 54.9) 28 (9, 59) 77 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Floyd County Urban No 45.5 (39.8, 51.8) 46 (12, 77) 48 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Wayne County Rural No 44.7 (38.9, 51.2) 49 (14, 81) 43 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Tippecanoe County Urban No 39.9 (35.7, 44.4) 66 (35, 86) 68 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.7)
Crawford County Rural No 44.8 (31.6, 62.8) 47 (2, 92) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.4)
Jasper County Urban No 45.5 (37.2, 55.4) 45 (6, 87) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
Monroe County Urban No 36.0 (31.7, 40.6) 82 (49, 90) 53 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Decatur County Rural No 46.1 (36.6, 57.6) 41 (5, 88) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.5)
Johnson County Urban No 40.0 (36.0, 44.2) 65 (37, 86) 77 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
LaPorte County Urban No 41.2 (36.8, 46.0) 57 (30, 85) 67 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Parke County Rural No 46.8 (35.1, 61.6) 40 (2, 90) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.8)
Spencer County Rural No 37.6 (28.4, 49.4) 76 (15, 92) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.5)
Dearborn County Urban No 48.2 (41.1, 56.3) 35 (7, 78) 34 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Morgan County Urban No 49.8 (43.6, 56.6) 27 (7, 64) 50 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Scott County Rural No 72.8 (60.3, 87.5) 1 (1, 21) 24 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.2, 0.2)
Tipton County Urban No 36.3 (26.2, 49.6) 81 (13, 92) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.3)
Vigo County Urban No 46.9 (41.9, 52.4) 39 (13, 69) 65 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Warren County Urban No 36.6 (23.5, 55.7) 79 (5, 92) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.6)
Gibson County Rural No 35.5 (28.0, 44.5) 84 (31, 92) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.6)
Marshall County Rural No 33.8 (27.6, 41.1) 88 (44, 92) 21 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Ohio County Urban No 58.6 (39.9, 85.8) 8 (1, 90) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Allen County Urban No 36.4 (33.9, 39.0) 80 (59, 88) 165 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Elkhart County Urban No 36.6 (33.2, 40.2) 78 (54, 89) 89 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Rush County Rural No 51.6 (39.6, 66.6) 22 (1, 87) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Switzerland County Rural No 51.7 (35.9, 72.8) 21 (1, 91) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.4)
Lawrence County Rural No 52.5 (44.9, 61.2) 17 (3, 61) 35 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Perry County Rural No 41.1 (30.8, 54.0) 58 (7, 91) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.5)
St. Joseph County Urban No 39.0 (36.1, 42.2) 72 (45, 85) 133 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Sullivan County Urban No 50.8 (39.7, 64.4) 24 (1, 86) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Cass County Rural No 44.3 (36.5, 53.5) 50 (9, 88) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5)
Miami County Rural No 51.8 (43.0, 61.9) 20 (2, 73) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Orange County Rural No 53.1 (41.7, 67.1) 16 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.0)
Clay County Urban No 43.6 (34.5, 54.7) 54 (7, 90) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Clinton County Rural No 40.7 (32.4, 50.6) 60 (13, 91) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.1)
Delaware County Urban No 51.2 (46.1, 56.7) 23 (7, 55) 76 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Harrison County Urban No 45.9 (38.3, 54.8) 43 (8, 85) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Howard County Urban No 46.1 (40.8, 51.9) 42 (14, 74) 57 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Huntington County Rural No 43.7 (35.9, 53.0) 52 (10, 88) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 50.2 (41.4, 60.4) 26 (3, 80) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 40.3 (33.0, 49.0) 61 (19, 90) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Putnam County Rural No 57.5 (48.3, 68.0) 10 (1, 55) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Starke County Rural No 54.7 (44.2, 67.2) 14 (1, 73) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Dubois County Rural No 30.7 (24.6, 38.1) 89 (55, 92) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Steuben County Rural No 38.5 (31.4, 47.1) 74 (23, 91) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Noble County Rural No 48.6 (40.8, 57.5) 32 (5, 78) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Wabash County Rural No 41.8 (34.0, 51.1) 55 (12, 90) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Benton County Urban No 57.1 (39.8, 80.4) 11 (1, 90) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.0)
Fayette County Rural No 52.4 (42.1, 64.8) 18 (2, 81) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Kosciusko County Rural No 40.1 (34.8, 46.0) 64 (28, 88) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Newton County Urban No 63.2 (49.0, 80.8) 3 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Randolph County Rural No 49.4 (39.6, 61.2) 30 (3, 85) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Whitley County Urban No 41.4 (33.6, 50.5) 56 (15, 90) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Adams County Rural No 35.7 (28.1, 44.8) 83 (28, 92) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.0)
Daviess County Rural No 40.8 (32.2, 51.1) 59 (10, 91) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Carroll County Urban No 40.3 (30.6, 52.4) 62 (9, 91) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.7)
DeKalb County Rural No 39.8 (32.8, 48.0) 67 (20, 90) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.8)
Grant County Rural No 56.5 (49.8, 63.9) 12 (2, 44) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Shelby County Urban No 48.3 (40.9, 56.8) 34 (6, 79) 31 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Union County Rural No 49.5 (32.2, 74.4) 29 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 2.6)
Brown County Urban No 47.6 (36.5, 61.9) 37 (2, 90) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
LaGrange County Rural No 38.9 (31.0, 48.2) 73 (18, 91) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Fountain County Rural No 52.2 (40.4, 66.9) 19 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.1)
Fulton County Rural No 57.5 (46.1, 71.4) 9 (1, 67) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Henry County Rural No 58.8 (51.2, 67.5) 7 (1, 41) 43 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Jennings County Rural No 67.7 (55.9, 81.3) 2 (1, 39) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Greene County Rural No 56.2 (46.8, 67.2) 13 (1, 63) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Blackford County Rural No 53.9 (40.2, 71.7) 15 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Pike County Rural No 59.7 (44.8, 78.8) 5 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Washington County Urban No 59.5 (49.1, 71.8) 6 (1, 54) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Knox County Rural No 49.3 (40.9, 59.1) 31 (3, 79) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 3.9)
Pulaski County Rural No 45.9 (33.3, 62.5) 44 (2, 91) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Wells County Urban No 38.1 (29.8, 48.2) 75 (18, 91) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.5)
Vermillion County Urban No 59.8 (45.9, 77.0) 4 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Martin County Rural No 50.8 (36.1, 70.5) 25 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top