Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 37.4 (36.9, 37.8) N/A 5,181 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -3.2)
United States N/A No 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) N/A 134,731 falling falling trend -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Marquette County Rural No 34.2 (29.1, 40.1) 70 (32, 80) 33 falling falling trend -16.1 (-24.5, -2.8)
Emmet County Rural No 32.5 (26.2, 40.3) 73 (26, 82) 19 falling falling trend -15.8 (-28.3, -2.8)
Schoolcraft County Rural No 46.2 (32.3, 66.5) 19 (1, 81) 7 falling falling trend -13.3 (-31.3, -1.3)
Montcalm County Urban No 46.3 (40.2, 53.2) 17 (5, 62) 42 falling falling trend -13.2 (-23.5, -2.1)
Cheboygan County Rural No 38.7 (31.3, 48.0) 52 (11, 78) 20 falling falling trend -6.5 (-25.5, -2.1)
Arenac County Rural No 47.3 (35.9, 62.1) 15 (1, 76) 13 falling falling trend -5.1 (-16.4, -2.1)
Wexford County Rural No 41.8 (34.0, 51.0) 38 (7, 76) 21 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.2, -2.7)
Oakland County Urban No 28.2 (27.0, 29.3) 76 (72, 80) 489 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -3.5)
Monroe County Urban No 40.8 (37.1, 44.9) 43 (18, 65) 93 falling falling trend -4.6 (-12.8, -2.3)
Gogebic County Rural No 37.4 (27.5, 50.9) 59 (6, 82) 10 falling falling trend -4.4 (-14.7, -2.3)
Van Buren County Rural No 39.0 (33.9, 44.8) 51 (16, 74) 44 falling falling trend -4.1 (-10.9, -2.4)
Jackson County Urban No 45.3 (41.4, 49.5) 24 (10, 50) 104 falling falling trend -4.0 (-12.4, -1.9)
Macomb County Urban No 39.8 (38.2, 41.5) 48 (33, 59) 481 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.9, -2.5)
Wayne County Urban No 38.4 (37.3, 39.6) 54 (40, 62) 854 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.5, -3.3)
Lapeer County Urban No 38.1 (33.4, 43.4) 57 (21, 75) 51 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.3, -2.1)
Alger County Rural Yes 24.3 (14.7, 40.1) 81 (28, 82) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.8)
Mackinac County Rural No 36.7 (25.9, 52.3) 63 (7, 82) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.2)
Washtenaw County Urban No 25.9 (23.7, 28.2) 80 (74, 82) 108 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
Cass County Urban No 44.6 (38.2, 51.9) 30 (7, 67) 37 falling falling trend -2.9 (-13.6, -1.3)
Genesee County Urban No 43.1 (40.7, 45.7) 34 (17, 50) 245 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.4)
St. Clair County Urban No 44.8 (41.0, 48.9) 27 (11, 53) 108 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -2.2)
Livingston County Urban No 32.2 (29.1, 35.4) 74 (53, 78) 88 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.2)
Midland County Urban No 31.9 (27.6, 36.8) 75 (48, 81) 40 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Benzie County Urban No 35.2 (26.5, 46.7) 66 (11, 82) 12 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.0)
Calhoun County Urban No 45.3 (41.0, 49.9) 25 (9, 54) 84 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.8, -1.7)
Shiawassee County Rural No 44.6 (38.9, 51.0) 29 (7, 63) 46 stable stable trend -2.6 (-16.5, 0.1)
Isabella County Rural No 40.9 (34.1, 48.7) 42 (9, 75) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 35.5 (32.5, 38.6) 65 (42, 75) 110 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Missaukee County Rural No 38.4 (28.2, 51.9) 56 (5, 82) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.7)
Saginaw County Urban No 34.9 (31.8, 38.1) 68 (43, 76) 100 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Newaygo County Rural No 47.0 (40.3, 54.7) 16 (4, 60) 36 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Barry County Urban No 35.0 (29.6, 41.1) 67 (28, 80) 31 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Presque Isle County Rural No 27.0 (18.7, 39.6) 79 (27, 82) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.8, -0.1)
Berrien County Urban No 39.9 (36.4, 43.8) 47 (21, 68) 95 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Grand Traverse County Urban No 33.7 (29.6, 38.4) 72 (41, 79) 50 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Leelanau County Urban Yes 21.8 (16.4, 29.3) 82 (72, 82) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Bay County Urban No 44.3 (39.7, 49.4) 31 (9, 58) 71 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Clare County Rural No 54.5 (45.6, 64.9) 9 (1, 46) 29 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Kent County Urban No 34.0 (32.1, 36.0) 71 (55, 75) 249 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Lenawee County Rural No 36.9 (32.6, 41.7) 61 (28, 75) 55 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Mason County Rural No 45.8 (37.5, 55.8) 20 (3, 71) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Allegan County Rural No 35.6 (31.5, 40.1) 64 (31, 76) 58 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Iron County Rural No 50.7 (38.3, 67.4) 11 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.1)
St. Joseph County Rural No 43.6 (37.5, 50.5) 33 (7, 69) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Ottawa County Urban No 27.2 (24.8, 29.7) 78 (71, 82) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Alcona County Rural No 43.8 (32.6, 60.5) 32 (1, 79) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Charlevoix County Rural No 39.8 (31.9, 49.7) 49 (8, 78) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Clinton County Urban No 27.3 (23.0, 32.2) 77 (63, 82) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Muskegon County Urban No 45.7 (41.9, 49.8) 21 (9, 52) 110 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Osceola County Rural No 45.7 (36.3, 57.2) 22 (2, 74) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Tuscola County Rural No 40.6 (34.8, 47.4) 44 (12, 73) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Ingham County Urban No 34.6 (31.7, 37.7) 69 (45, 76) 107 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Otsego County Rural No 38.4 (30.1, 48.7) 55 (9, 81) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Baraga County Rural No 37.8 (24.7, 57.1) 58 (2, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.5)
Ogemaw County Rural No 58.4 (48.2, 70.7) 4 (1, 38) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Branch County Rural No 45.6 (38.3, 53.9) 23 (4, 69) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Delta County Rural No 42.6 (35.6, 50.8) 36 (7, 73) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Houghton County Rural No 40.3 (32.7, 49.5) 45 (9, 78) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.6)
Ionia County Urban No 42.3 (36.0, 49.5) 37 (9, 72) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Lake County Rural No 44.8 (33.0, 60.7) 28 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Sanilac County Rural No 40.9 (34.4, 48.6) 40 (10, 75) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Mecosta County Rural No 46.3 (38.4, 55.4) 18 (3, 70) 26 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Menominee County Rural No 40.1 (32.0, 50.2) 46 (7, 78) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
Dickinson County Rural No 37.2 (29.4, 46.7) 60 (11, 81) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Eaton County Urban No 36.7 (32.5, 41.4) 62 (28, 76) 58 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Montmorency County Rural No 56.9 (41.9, 77.7) 6 (1, 70) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Manistee County Rural No 44.9 (36.6, 55.0) 26 (3, 73) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Huron County Rural No 40.9 (33.6, 49.7) 41 (8, 76) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Ontonagon County Rural No 43.0 (29.7, 67.6) 35 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.0)
Iosco County Rural No 56.1 (46.6, 67.5) 8 (1, 45) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Roscommon County Rural No 59.0 (49.0, 71.4) 2 (1, 34) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 0.8)
Crawford County Rural No 57.6 (45.1, 73.7) 5 (1, 57) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Gratiot County Rural No 41.1 (33.9, 49.5) 39 (8, 75) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Kalkaska County Urban No 58.5 (46.0, 73.9) 3 (1, 52) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Hillsdale County Rural No 50.2 (42.9, 58.5) 12 (2, 52) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Oscoda County Rural No 56.6 (41.2, 78.0) 7 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.2)
Alpena County Rural No 53.5 (44.4, 64.3) 10 (1, 51) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Chippewa County Rural No 49.8 (41.3, 59.8) 13 (1, 62) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.6)
Gladwin County Rural No 59.6 (49.8, 71.3) 1 (1, 30) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Oceana County Rural No 38.5 (30.4, 48.4) 53 (10, 79) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Antrim County Rural No 39.7 (31.8, 49.7) 50 (9, 79) 18 stable stable trend 10.6 (-2.7, 21.9)
Luce County Rural No 48.1 (31.6, 72.6) 14 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top