Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 29.4 (28.8, 29.9) N/A 2,158 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -2.1)
United States N/A No 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) N/A 134,731 falling falling trend -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Roseau County Rural No 26.2 (17.6, 38.3) 70 (11, 81) 6 stable stable trend -41.8 (-69.1, 0.6)
Aitkin County Rural No 39.5 (30.6, 51.8) 15 (3, 68) 15 falling falling trend -16.8 (-26.3, -4.4)
Dodge County Urban Yes 21.4 (14.0, 31.5) 80 (26, 81) 5 falling falling trend -10.5 (-30.4, -4.2)
Anoka County Urban No 28.2 (25.9, 30.6) 63 (40, 74) 120 falling falling trend -8.6 (-19.1, -4.3)
Carver County Urban Yes 19.4 (15.8, 23.5) 81 (67, 81) 22 falling falling trend -8.6 (-15.1, -5.2)
Marshall County Rural Yes 23.6 (14.3, 38.5) 78 (12, 81) 4 falling falling trend -8.0 (-29.6, -2.5)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 26.7 (21.2, 33.3) 69 (23, 81) 17 falling falling trend -7.1 (-22.4, -2.4)
Dakota County Urban Yes 24.5 (22.6, 26.5) 75 (58, 80) 126 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.5, -4.2)
Koochiching County Rural No 25.2 (16.7, 38.1) 74 (12, 81) 5 falling falling trend -5.4 (-10.5, -4.0)
St. Louis County Urban No 33.9 (31.0, 37.0) 33 (16, 56) 105 falling falling trend -5.0 (-11.8, -2.4)
Crow Wing County Rural No 32.4 (28.0, 37.5) 42 (14, 71) 39 falling falling trend -4.5 (-9.1, -3.0)
Cass County Rural No 31.6 (25.2, 39.5) 45 (9, 78) 18 stable stable trend -4.3 (-29.8, 0.4)
Ramsey County Urban No 28.6 (26.7, 30.5) 62 (40, 70) 184 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.7, -2.1)
Hennepin County Urban No 25.3 (24.1, 26.5) 72 (59, 78) 368 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.9, -3.0)
Washington County Urban No 25.3 (22.9, 27.8) 73 (53, 79) 84 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -2.0)
Le Sueur County Urban No 32.5 (25.0, 41.7) 41 (7, 78) 13 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -1.1)
Rice County Rural No 30.8 (25.7, 36.7) 52 (15, 78) 26 falling falling trend -3.1 (-8.8, -1.9)
Scott County Urban No 29.3 (25.4, 33.7) 60 (22, 76) 41 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -1.8)
Beltrami County Rural No 33.4 (27.1, 40.9) 35 (9, 75) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.4)
Lake County Rural No 32.8 (22.6, 47.6) 39 (5, 81) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.7)
Sibley County Rural No 31.0 (21.2, 44.3) 49 (6, 81) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-9.3, -0.6)
Olmsted County Urban No 26.0 (23.0, 29.4) 71 (43, 79) 53 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Becker County Rural No 31.3 (25.1, 38.8) 46 (11, 78) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.1)
Chisago County Urban No 39.6 (33.3, 46.8) 14 (4, 53) 29 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
McLeod County Rural No 27.7 (21.8, 34.9) 64 (16, 81) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-24.9, 0.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 34.6 (26.6, 44.5) 26 (6, 79) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.4)
Wabasha County Urban No 33.1 (24.9, 43.7) 37 (6, 79) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.4)
Nicollet County Urban Yes 23.4 (17.5, 30.8) 79 (28, 81) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Waseca County Rural No 27.4 (19.0, 38.6) 67 (9, 81) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 0.6)
Murray County Rural No 31.0 (20.0, 48.0) 50 (4, 81) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.9, 1.1)
Steele County Rural No 29.8 (23.5, 37.4) 57 (13, 80) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.2)
Swift County Rural No 33.7 (22.3, 50.2) 34 (3, 81) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.6)
Mower County Rural No 30.6 (24.4, 38.1) 54 (13, 79) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.4)
Pope County Rural No 35.0 (23.5, 51.1) 25 (3, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.3)
Lyon County Rural No 30.9 (23.0, 40.8) 51 (8, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.2)
Redwood County Rural No 29.6 (20.6, 41.9) 58 (8, 81) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.6)
Winona County Rural No 35.4 (29.1, 42.8) 21 (7, 70) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Wright County Urban No 34.2 (30.1, 38.8) 30 (12, 63) 51 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Douglas County Rural No 27.5 (22.2, 33.9) 66 (20, 80) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Hubbard County Rural No 30.1 (22.7, 39.8) 55 (9, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Pine County Rural No 42.3 (34.4, 51.8) 10 (3, 53) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 32.2 (20.6, 49.0) 43 (4, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.1)
Faribault County Rural No 37.6 (27.4, 51.3) 17 (3, 78) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.6)
Itasca County Rural No 41.2 (34.8, 48.6) 11 (3, 48) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Mahnomen County Rural No 77.7 (51.1, 114.5) 1 (1, 30) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-19.0, 1.9)
Morrison County Rural No 31.2 (24.7, 39.1) 47 (11, 79) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Otter Tail County Rural No 33.9 (28.9, 39.8) 32 (10, 69) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Renville County Rural No 27.1 (18.5, 39.2) 68 (10, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 0.8)
Benton County Urban No 39.4 (31.4, 48.8) 16 (4, 63) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Polk County Urban No 32.8 (25.6, 41.8) 38 (7, 78) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
Stearns County Urban No 30.0 (26.6, 33.8) 56 (25, 73) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Blue Earth County Urban No 30.6 (25.2, 36.9) 53 (15, 78) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Clay County Urban No 31.1 (25.4, 37.6) 48 (13, 77) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Jackson County Rural Yes 23.7 (14.3, 38.3) 77 (12, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 1.8)
Sherburne County Urban No 40.4 (34.7, 46.7) 12 (5, 45) 39 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Brown County Rural No 35.3 (27.5, 45.0) 23 (5, 76) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.0, 0.1)
Kanabec County Rural No 53.0 (41.0, 68.1) 5 (1, 32) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Fillmore County Urban No 29.3 (21.5, 39.5) 59 (8, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Martin County Rural No 36.1 (27.1, 47.7) 20 (4, 77) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.7)
Goodhue County Rural No 34.4 (28.6, 41.2) 28 (8, 71) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Grant County Rural No 35.4 (21.2, 57.9) 22 (2, 81) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 1.9)
Houston County Urban No 29.3 (20.4, 41.1) 61 (7, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.7)
Meeker County Rural No 37.1 (28.6, 47.7) 19 (3, 74) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Freeborn County Rural No 35.1 (27.9, 43.9) 24 (5, 75) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Isanti County Urban No 34.3 (27.6, 42.2) 29 (7, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.2)
Chippewa County Rural No 37.5 (26.3, 52.6) 18 (3, 79) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
Nobles County Rural No 32.1 (23.2, 43.5) 44 (6, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Pennington County Rural No 33.1 (22.8, 47.1) 36 (4, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.1)
Cottonwood County Rural No 27.5 (17.6, 41.9) 65 (7, 81) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 3.8)
Norman County Rural No 54.6 (36.0, 81.1) 3 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.9)
Wadena County Rural No 55.9 (42.5, 72.7) 2 (1, 33) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.2)
Watonwan County Rural No 40.1 (26.8, 58.0) 13 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.3)
Pipestone County Rural No 48.6 (33.5, 69.1) 7 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.8)
Carlton County Urban No 43.8 (35.9, 53.0) 9 (2, 45) 22 stable stable trend 12.5 (-1.0, 24.8)
Todd County Rural No 32.5 (25.2, 41.6) 40 (7, 78) 14 rising rising trend 15.9 (4.1, 25.1)
Lac qui Parle County Rural Yes 23.9 (14.2, 41.1) 76 (11, 81) 3 rising rising trend 31.2 (10.8, 64.3)
Clearwater County Rural No 47.0 (31.1, 69.2) 8 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Kittson County Rural No 53.4 (30.4, 90.0) 4 (1, 80) 3
*
*
Lincoln County Rural No 34.5 (19.8, 58.4) 27 (2, 81) 3
*
*
Rock County Urban No 34.2 (22.3, 51.4) 31 (3, 81) 5
*
*
Wilkin County Rural No 48.8 (30.7, 75.3) 6 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Big Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 11:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top