Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A No 25.7 (25.5, 26.0) N/A 6,864 falling falling trend -5.0 (-5.2, -4.7)
United States N/A No 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) N/A 134,731 falling falling trend -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Livingston County Urban No 32.2 (27.1, 38.0) 43 (15, 55) 30 falling falling trend -13.5 (-24.4, -3.6)
Schenectady County Urban No 32.8 (29.4, 36.5) 38 (22, 53) 70 falling falling trend -8.9 (-16.2, -3.7)
New York County Urban Yes 16.8 (16.0, 17.6) 62 (60, 62) 375 falling falling trend -7.2 (-9.1, -5.9)
Saratoga County Urban No 31.8 (29.2, 34.7) 45 (28, 53) 109 falling falling trend -6.8 (-13.6, -4.1)
Kings County Urban Yes 18.2 (17.5, 18.9) 60 (59, 61) 555 falling falling trend -6.5 (-7.9, -4.3)
Westchester County Urban Yes 19.4 (18.3, 20.4) 59 (56, 60) 270 falling falling trend -6.0 (-7.2, -5.1)
Nassau County Urban Yes 20.4 (19.5, 21.3) 57 (56, 59) 399 falling falling trend -5.9 (-7.0, -5.1)
Queens County Urban Yes 16.9 (16.2, 17.5) 61 (60, 62) 519 falling falling trend -5.9 (-6.7, -5.3)
Suffolk County Urban No 26.1 (25.1, 27.1) 55 (50, 55) 541 falling falling trend -5.6 (-6.5, -4.9)
Bronx County Urban Yes 20.2 (19.2, 21.2) 58 (56, 59) 321 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.7, -4.4)
Albany County Urban No 31.0 (28.6, 33.5) 49 (32, 53) 133 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -3.7)
Ulster County Urban No 31.6 (28.7, 34.8) 46 (27, 54) 90 falling falling trend -4.9 (-11.6, -3.1)
Niagara County Urban No 39.4 (36.3, 42.7) 20 (7, 34) 126 falling falling trend -4.8 (-10.3, -2.9)
Monroe County Urban No 30.5 (29.0, 32.1) 50 (37, 53) 320 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.0, -3.7)
Columbia County Rural No 31.5 (26.8, 36.9) 47 (17, 55) 34 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.9, -3.3)
Ontario County Urban No 31.0 (27.3, 35.1) 48 (26, 55) 55 falling falling trend -4.5 (-13.0, -3.0)
Erie County Urban No 34.0 (32.6, 35.5) 35 (26, 44) 461 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.1, -2.2)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 40.4 (36.0, 45.4) 17 (3, 37) 62 falling falling trend -4.0 (-12.5, -2.8)
Putnam County Urban No 27.4 (23.6, 31.7) 53 (36, 56) 37 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.9, -2.8)
Oneida County Urban No 36.7 (33.9, 39.8) 28 (13, 41) 124 falling falling trend -3.7 (-9.0, -2.4)
Onondaga County Urban No 35.0 (32.9, 37.1) 32 (21, 43) 226 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -3.1)
Orange County Urban No 32.5 (30.2, 35.0) 41 (26, 52) 147 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.3, -2.9)
Richmond County Urban No 32.1 (30.2, 34.2) 44 (30, 51) 203 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.6, -2.8)
Rockland County Urban Yes 22.6 (20.6, 24.8) 56 (54, 59) 92 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.4)
Clinton County Rural No 42.7 (37.4, 48.6) 9 (1, 34) 49 falling falling trend -3.2 (-11.9, -1.8)
Dutchess County Urban No 29.3 (27.0, 31.7) 51 (37, 55) 125 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.6)
Otsego County Rural No 32.9 (27.6, 39.0) 37 (12, 55) 30 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.9)
Chenango County Rural No 36.6 (30.7, 43.6) 29 (4, 53) 28 falling falling trend -3.0 (-8.3, -1.7)
Steuben County Rural No 45.0 (40.1, 50.4) 5 (1, 25) 64 falling falling trend -3.0 (-8.0, -2.0)
Schoharie County Urban No 38.3 (30.9, 47.5) 24 (2, 53) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.9)
Seneca County Rural No 37.0 (29.6, 45.8) 27 (2, 54) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.6)
Yates County Rural No 34.5 (26.4, 44.7) 33 (3, 56) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.1)
Tompkins County Urban No 26.6 (22.6, 31.2) 54 (37, 57) 32 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Rensselaer County Urban No 39.7 (36.0, 43.8) 18 (5, 36) 87 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
Allegany County Rural No 38.4 (32.0, 45.8) 23 (2, 51) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.3)
Herkimer County Urban No 32.4 (27.4, 38.1) 42 (16, 55) 32 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Lewis County Rural No 27.5 (20.8, 36.1) 52 (17, 60) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.1)
Sullivan County Rural No 36.5 (31.7, 42.0) 30 (6, 51) 42 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.4)
Broome County Urban No 32.7 (29.8, 35.8) 39 (24, 52) 97 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Jefferson County Urban No 43.3 (38.3, 48.7) 7 (1, 30) 56 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Warren County Urban No 33.9 (29.1, 39.3) 36 (11, 54) 38 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Cayuga County Rural No 35.5 (30.8, 40.8) 31 (9, 52) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Madison County Urban No 37.6 (32.4, 43.5) 26 (5, 50) 39 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Franklin County Rural No 42.8 (36.0, 50.7) 8 (1, 40) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Greene County Rural No 41.8 (35.7, 48.8) 12 (1, 42) 35 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Tioga County Urban No 32.6 (27.1, 39.0) 40 (12, 55) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Wayne County Urban No 40.6 (35.9, 45.9) 16 (2, 36) 57 falling falling trend -2.1 (-10.5, -0.3)
Chemung County Urban No 46.4 (41.2, 52.3) 4 (1, 24) 58 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Oswego County Urban No 47.6 (42.7, 52.8) 3 (1, 18) 75 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Washington County Urban No 42.1 (36.4, 48.6) 11 (1, 38) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Wyoming County Rural No 34.5 (28.1, 42.1) 34 (6, 55) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Delaware County Rural No 37.9 (32.1, 44.8) 25 (3, 50) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Fulton County Rural No 44.5 (38.1, 51.9) 6 (1, 35) 36 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Genesee County Rural No 41.7 (35.6, 48.5) 13 (1, 40) 35 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Essex County Rural No 40.8 (34.1, 48.9) 14 (1, 47) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Hamilton County Rural No 39.6 (25.1, 66.7) 19 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.0)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 38.5 (33.5, 44.2) 22 (4, 46) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Orleans County Urban No 48.4 (40.4, 57.5) 2 (1, 29) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Chautauqua County Rural No 39.3 (35.4, 43.6) 21 (5, 38) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Cortland County Rural No 40.7 (33.6, 49.0) 15 (1, 49) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 42.5 (35.9, 50.0) 10 (1, 41) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Schuyler County Rural No 54.4 (42.6, 69.0) 1 (1, 29) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top