Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS), 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Hillsdale County Rural *** 9.9 (5.6, 16.8) 1 (1, 24) 3
*
*
Van Buren County Rural *** 8.5 (5.5, 13.0) 2 (1, 23) 5
*
*
Washtenaw County Urban *** 7.9 (6.4, 9.8) 3 (1, 15) 18 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.1, 7.0)
Wayne County Urban *** 7.5 (6.8, 8.2) 4 (1, 11) 92 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.5)
Berrien County Urban *** 7.2 (5.1, 9.9) 5 (1, 22) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.5)
Muskegon County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.5) 6 (1, 23) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 4.2)
Ingham County Urban *** 6.9 (5.2, 9.0) 7 (1, 22) 11 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 6.8)
Genesee County Urban *** 6.7 (5.4, 8.2) 8 (2, 20) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.4)
Kent County Urban *** 6.2 (5.1, 7.4) 9 (3, 21) 24 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.9)
Lenawee County Rural *** 6.2 (3.9, 9.5) 10 (1, 26) 4
*
*
Allegan County Rural *** 6.0 (3.9, 9.1) 11 (1, 26) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 6.6)
Oakland County Urban *** 6.0 (5.3, 6.8) 12 (6, 20) 57 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 3.0)
Kalamazoo County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 7.9) 13 (2, 25) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.3)
Monroe County Urban *** 5.9 (4.0, 8.6) 14 (1, 26) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 5.0)
Macomb County Urban *** 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) 15 (7, 23) 38 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.8)
Jackson County Urban *** 5.5 (3.7, 8.0) 16 (2, 26) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.9)
Calhoun County Urban *** 5.5 (3.6, 8.1) 17 (2, 26) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.4)
Eaton County Urban *** 5.4 (3.5, 8.2) 18 (2, 26) 5
*
*
Midland County Urban *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.6) 19 (2, 26) 3
*
*
Ottawa County Urban *** 5.1 (3.8, 6.8) 20 (6, 26) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 3.1)
Lapeer County Urban *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.3) 21 (2, 26) 3
*
*
Saginaw County Urban *** 4.6 (3.2, 6.4) 22 (8, 26) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 3.0)
St. Clair County Urban *** 4.5 (3.1, 6.6) 23 (7, 26) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.9)
Livingston County Urban *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.3) 24 (8, 26) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.3)
Grand Traverse County Urban *** 3.9 (2.3, 6.7) 25 (8, 26) 3
*
*
Bay County Urban *** 3.5 (1.9, 6.1) 26 (10, 26) 3
*
*
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ionia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montcalm County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shiawassee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Joseph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuscola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top