Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Ovary, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Northumberland County Rural *** 9.2 (5.9, 13.6) 1 (1, 34) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.0, 2.3)
Somerset County Rural *** 9.0 (5.8, 13.6) 2 (1, 35) 5
*
*
Franklin County Urban *** 8.7 (6.5, 11.5) 3 (1, 28) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.0)
Crawford County Rural *** 7.9 (5.1, 11.9) 4 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Clearfield County Rural *** 7.5 (4.7, 11.8) 5 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.0)
Washington County Urban *** 7.1 (5.4, 9.3) 6 (1, 35) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.5)
Erie County Urban *** 7.1 (5.5, 9.2) 7 (1, 33) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.4)
Allegheny County Urban *** 7.0 (6.3, 7.9) 8 (3, 24) 69 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Indiana County Rural *** 7.0 (4.3, 11.1) 9 (1, 38) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.1)
Bucks County Urban *** 6.9 (5.9, 8.1) 10 (3, 29) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Cumberland County Urban *** 6.9 (5.3, 8.8) 11 (1, 35) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Mercer County Rural *** 6.7 (4.4, 10.0) 12 (1, 38) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.8)
Centre County Urban *** 6.7 (4.5, 9.6) 13 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.7)
Delaware County Urban *** 6.6 (5.5, 7.9) 14 (3, 33) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Lawrence County Urban *** 6.6 (4.2, 10.1) 15 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.5, 1.1)
Beaver County Urban *** 6.5 (4.6, 9.2) 16 (1, 38) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.0)
Fayette County Urban *** 6.5 (4.4, 9.5) 17 (1, 38) 6 falling falling trend -8.4 (-30.8, -2.2)
Lancaster County Urban *** 6.3 (5.2, 7.6) 18 (4, 35) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Chester County Urban *** 6.3 (5.2, 7.6) 19 (4, 35) 24 falling falling trend -11.9 (-23.3, -0.8)
Lackawanna County Urban *** 6.3 (4.7, 8.2) 20 (2, 37) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.6)
York County Urban *** 6.1 (4.9, 7.4) 21 (5, 36) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Blair County Urban *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.2) 22 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.0)
Monroe County Rural *** 6.1 (4.2, 8.5) 23 (2, 38) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.3)
Butler County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 8.2) 24 (3, 38) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.6)
Adams County Urban *** 6.0 (3.8, 9.3) 25 (1, 38) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 2.0)
Westmoreland County Urban *** 5.9 (4.7, 7.3) 26 (6, 37) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.4)
Armstrong County Urban *** 5.8 (3.4, 10.0) 27 (1, 38) 3 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.0, 0.7)
Lycoming County Urban *** 5.7 (3.8, 8.5) 28 (2, 38) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -1.3)
Montgomery County Urban *** 5.7 (4.9, 6.6) 29 (11, 36) 38 falling falling trend -6.8 (-16.9, -3.3)
Philadelphia County Urban *** 5.6 (4.9, 6.3) 30 (14, 35) 55 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.2)
Cambria County Urban *** 5.6 (3.8, 8.1) 31 (3, 38) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -1.0)
Schuylkill County Rural *** 5.5 (3.7, 8.1) 32 (3, 38) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -1.3)
Lehigh County Urban *** 5.5 (4.3, 6.9) 33 (7, 38) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.2)
Luzerne County Urban *** 5.5 (4.2, 7.0) 34 (6, 38) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.4)
Dauphin County Urban *** 5.1 (3.7, 6.8) 35 (8, 38) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.5)
Northampton County Urban *** 4.4 (3.3, 5.9) 36 (19, 38) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.6)
Lebanon County Urban *** 4.3 (2.8, 6.5) 37 (11, 38) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.4)
Berks County Urban *** 4.2 (3.3, 5.5) 38 (22, 38) 13 falling falling trend -3.8 (-9.4, -2.4)
Bedford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bradford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carbon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huntingdon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Juniata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McKean County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mifflin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montour County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Potter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Snyder County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Susquehanna County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tioga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Venango County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 1:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top