Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Prostate, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Bolivar County Rural No 66.9 (46.6, 92.6) 1 (1, 10) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.1)
Leflore County Rural No 66.5 (45.6, 93.2) 2 (1, 11) 7
*
*
Holmes County Urban No 49.9 (30.4, 77.4) 3 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Adams County Rural No 46.1 (32.6, 63.6) 4 (1, 23) 8 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.1, 25.9)
Sunflower County Rural No 45.2 (28.6, 67.5) 5 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Coahoma County Rural No 40.4 (24.8, 62.5) 6 (1, 36) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.8)
Carroll County Rural No 40.4 (23.2, 68.3) 7 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Scott County Urban No 37.6 (23.6, 56.7) 8 (2, 35) 4
*
*
Yazoo County Urban No 37.3 (22.2, 58.1) 9 (1, 36) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.7)
Lafayette County Rural No 36.9 (24.3, 53.2) 10 (2, 34) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.6)
Clarke County Rural No 36.6 (21.8, 58.9) 11 (2, 36) 3
*
*
Madison County Urban No 33.5 (25.3, 43.4) 12 (4, 31) 13 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.4, -4.0)
Neshoba County Rural No 33.2 (20.6, 50.7) 13 (2, 37) 4
*
*
Washington County Rural No 32.7 (22.6, 45.9) 14 (3, 35) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.6, -0.2)
Lowndes County Rural No 31.1 (22.3, 42.2) 15 (4, 35) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 3.0)
Marshall County Urban No 30.2 (19.1, 45.3) 16 (3, 37) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.3)
Pike County Rural No 29.7 (19.7, 43.1) 17 (4, 37) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 29.3 (18.5, 43.9) 18 (4, 37) 5
*
*
Warren County Rural No 29.1 (19.2, 42.1) 19 (4, 37) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.4)
Lee County Rural No 28.6 (20.6, 38.4) 20 (6, 35) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.1)
Hinds County Urban No 28.3 (23.6, 33.6) 21 (10, 31) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Pontotoc County Rural No 28.2 (16.8, 44.0) 22 (4, 38) 4
*
*
Jones County Rural No 27.7 (20.1, 37.2) 23 (6, 36) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 11.2)
Grenada County Rural No 26.3 (14.7, 43.9) 24 (4, 38) 3
*
*
DeSoto County Urban No 26.2 (20.6, 32.6) 25 (10, 34) 18 stable stable trend 5.9 (-3.5, 29.0)
Jackson County Urban No 25.7 (20.5, 31.8) 26 (11, 35) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 5.1)
Panola County Rural No 24.8 (15.1, 38.5) 27 (6, 38) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.6)
Monroe County Rural No 23.8 (14.7, 36.7) 28 (7, 38) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.4)
Tate County Urban No 23.2 (13.1, 38.0) 29 (6, 38) 3
*
*
Oktibbeha County Rural No 21.9 (13.5, 33.4) 30 (9, 38) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.0, -0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 21.8 (17.7, 26.5) 31 (17, 36) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.4)
Pearl River County Rural No 21.0 (14.0, 30.1) 32 (12, 38) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 8.8)
Forrest County Urban No 20.8 (14.1, 29.5) 33 (13, 38) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.8, -0.4)
Lauderdale County Rural No 19.9 (14.0, 27.6) 34 (15, 38) 7 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.5, -2.7)
Alcorn County Rural No 18.4 (10.8, 29.6) 35 (14, 38) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.4)
Rankin County Urban No 17.0 (12.9, 22.0) 36 (25, 38) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 9.6)
Hancock County Urban Yes 15.2 (9.3, 23.7) 37 (23, 38) 4
*
*
Lamar County Urban Yes 12.5 (7.3, 19.9) 38 (28, 38) 3 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.2, -0.7)
Amite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Copiah County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prentiss County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Simpson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top