Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Prostate, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Franklin County Urban No 22.7 (12.4, 38.5) 25 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Fulton County Rural No 27.8 (15.6, 46.0) 5 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Gibson County Rural No 18.7 (10.5, 30.7) 47 (2, 61) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.8)
LaGrange County Rural No 20.1 (11.3, 32.7) 40 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Knox County Rural No 17.5 (10.1, 28.4) 50 (3, 61) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.2)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 11.7 (6.7, 19.3) 61 (28, 61) 3
*
*
Noble County Rural Yes 16.8 (9.6, 27.1) 53 (4, 61) 3 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.2, -0.7)
Carroll County Urban No 26.4 (15.3, 42.9) 9 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Clinton County Rural No 22.1 (13.0, 35.1) 28 (1, 61) 3 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.8, 0.2)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 15.6 (9.1, 25.1) 57 (8, 61) 3
*
*
Fountain County Rural No 30.9 (18.1, 50.3) 2 (1, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.6, 2.4)
Henry County Rural Yes 12.3 (7.2, 19.9) 60 (26, 61) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.3)
Jackson County Rural Yes 16.5 (9.6, 26.3) 54 (6, 61) 3
*
*
Owen County Urban No 28.2 (16.1, 46.3) 4 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Jennings County Rural No 23.7 (13.9, 37.9) 21 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Miami County Rural No 19.5 (11.6, 30.8) 41 (2, 61) 3
*
*
Ripley County Rural No 21.7 (12.8, 34.6) 31 (1, 61) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.9)
Huntington County Rural No 21.2 (12.4, 33.6) 33 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 1.9)
Posey County Urban No 27.8 (16.7, 43.7) 6 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Adams County Rural No 23.9 (14.7, 36.7) 17 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.3)
Putnam County Rural No 22.3 (13.9, 34.0) 27 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Daviess County Rural No 29.1 (18.0, 44.4) 3 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Whitley County Urban No 23.9 (14.7, 36.9) 15 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.2)
Dubois County Rural No 21.1 (13.3, 31.8) 34 (2, 61) 4
*
*
Randolph County Rural No 31.9 (20.3, 48.1) 1 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.5)
Greene County Rural No 25.7 (16.4, 38.8) 11 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.4, 2.0)
Jasper County Urban No 27.0 (17.1, 40.6) 7 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.9)
Wabash County Rural No 23.8 (15.3, 35.7) 19 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Harrison County Urban No 23.3 (14.9, 34.8) 23 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.3, 5.8)
Steuben County Rural No 23.3 (14.9, 35.0) 24 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 2.5)
Shelby County Urban No 23.7 (15.7, 34.5) 20 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Warrick County Urban Yes 16.3 (10.9, 23.6) 55 (11, 61) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -1.0)
Montgomery County Rural No 26.9 (18.1, 38.7) 8 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.8)
Dearborn County Urban No 26.3 (17.6, 37.7) 10 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.4)
Marshall County Rural No 24.3 (16.6, 34.6) 14 (1, 59) 6
*
*
Morgan County Urban Yes 16.9 (11.3, 24.3) 52 (10, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.3)
Boone County Urban No 22.4 (15.4, 31.5) 26 (2, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -0.4)
Grant County Rural No 18.1 (12.6, 25.5) 49 (7, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.3)
Wayne County Rural No 18.5 (12.8, 25.8) 48 (7, 61) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.4)
Clark County Urban Yes 15.0 (10.4, 20.9) 58 (21, 61) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.5)
Floyd County Urban No 20.3 (14.1, 28.1) 39 (4, 60) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.7, 20.4)
Hancock County Urban No 19.0 (13.4, 26.1) 44 (7, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 2.5)
Bartholomew County Urban No 21.3 (15.4, 28.8) 32 (3, 59) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.2)
Tippecanoe County Urban Yes 14.1 (10.3, 18.8) 59 (30, 61) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.3, -2.0)
Howard County Urban No 18.9 (13.9, 25.3) 45 (7, 60) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.7)
Kosciusko County Rural No 25.3 (18.7, 33.4) 12 (1, 54) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.3)
Vigo County Urban No 20.6 (15.4, 27.1) 35 (5, 59) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Delaware County Urban No 19.1 (14.6, 24.8) 43 (9, 60) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Monroe County Urban No 21.9 (16.8, 28.1) 29 (4, 56) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
LaPorte County Urban No 23.5 (18.1, 30.1) 22 (2, 54) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.7)
Madison County Urban No 18.8 (14.5, 24.0) 46 (12, 60) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.2)
Porter County Urban Yes 15.7 (12.1, 20.0) 56 (27, 61) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Hendricks County Urban No 20.3 (15.7, 25.7) 38 (7, 59) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.2)
Johnson County Urban No 20.4 (16.0, 25.7) 37 (8, 57) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 1.2)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 19.2 (15.3, 23.7) 42 (12, 58) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Elkhart County Urban No 20.5 (16.6, 25.1) 36 (9, 56) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Hamilton County Urban No 17.5 (14.4, 21.0) 51 (22, 59) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.4)
St. Joseph County Urban No 24.4 (20.7, 28.4) 13 (4, 41) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Allen County Urban No 23.9 (20.7, 27.5) 16 (5, 40) 41 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Lake County Urban No 21.9 (19.3, 24.7) 30 (11, 47) 56 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 3.2)
Marion County Urban No 23.8 (21.5, 26.3) 18 (7, 37) 84 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 3:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top