Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Prostate, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A No 19.9 (19.3, 20.7) N/A 688 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 2.9)
United States N/A No 19.2 (19.1, 19.3) N/A 32,830 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Loudon County Urban Yes 9.5 (5.9, 15.0) 56 (41, 56) 4 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.8, -2.7)
Blount County Urban Yes 13.2 (9.9, 17.4) 54 (31, 56) 11 stable stable trend -5.0 (-23.1, 6.6)
Roane County Urban Yes 13.4 (8.9, 19.9) 53 (20, 56) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.0, -1.6)
Carter County Urban No 17.3 (11.8, 24.8) 41 (8, 56) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.6, -2.0)
Dickson County Urban No 17.9 (11.0, 27.3) 40 (4, 56) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -1.7)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 16.6 (9.7, 26.8) 46 (4, 56) 3 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.3, -0.3)
Marion County Urban No 21.1 (11.9, 34.8) 22 (1, 56) 3 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.5, 0.1)
Giles County Rural No 20.9 (12.1, 33.9) 23 (1, 56) 3 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -0.8)
Hamilton County Urban No 19.9 (17.1, 22.9) 30 (12, 45) 39 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.3)
Franklin County Rural No 19.4 (12.6, 29.0) 34 (3, 56) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.8)
Tipton County Urban No 20.7 (13.6, 30.1) 26 (2, 55) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.2)
Anderson County Urban Yes 13.8 (9.4, 19.7) 52 (22, 56) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -0.9)
Hamblen County Urban Yes 14.9 (9.5, 22.2) 49 (12, 56) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.6)
Monroe County Rural Yes 13.8 (8.1, 22.1) 51 (11, 56) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.8, 0.5)
Williamson County Urban Yes 15.6 (12.4, 19.4) 48 (23, 55) 17 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.1)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 13.0 (9.3, 18.5) 55 (28, 56) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.1)
Lauderdale County Rural No 38.2 (22.6, 59.7) 1 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.5, 1.0)
Sevier County Rural Yes 16.0 (11.4, 21.9) 47 (13, 56) 9 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.7)
Shelby County Urban No 27.8 (25.3, 30.4) 7 (2, 17) 103 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Henry County Rural No 21.2 (13.3, 32.8) 21 (2, 56) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 0.9)
Knox County Urban Yes 16.8 (14.4, 19.5) 45 (24, 52) 37 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 19.8 (15.0, 25.5) 32 (6, 53) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.8)
Hardeman County Rural No 20.4 (11.6, 33.7) 28 (1, 56) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 20.6 (13.9, 29.6) 27 (2, 55) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 2.3)
Warren County Rural No 19.0 (11.8, 29.0) 36 (3, 56) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 1.8)
Bradley County Urban No 24.5 (18.4, 31.9) 10 (2, 45) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.5)
McMinn County Rural Yes 16.9 (11.1, 24.8) 44 (6, 56) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Putnam County Rural No 18.1 (12.3, 25.6) 37 (6, 56) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.8)
Sullivan County Urban No 17.9 (14.5, 22.0) 38 (13, 52) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.7)
Greene County Rural No 20.7 (14.9, 28.3) 24 (3, 53) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.2)
Madison County Urban No 21.8 (16.2, 28.7) 19 (3, 51) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Davidson County Urban No 23.3 (20.6, 26.2) 12 (6, 31) 59 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Wilson County Urban No 22.3 (17.0, 28.6) 17 (3, 48) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 2.1)
Lawrence County Rural No 24.4 (15.6, 36.2) 11 (1, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.9, 2.2)
Rutherford County Urban No 25.4 (20.9, 30.4) 9 (2, 33) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.6)
Washington County Urban No 22.6 (18.0, 28.0) 15 (4, 45) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.1)
Dyer County Rural No 19.8 (12.2, 30.7) 31 (2, 56) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.7)
Gibson County Urban No 29.1 (20.4, 40.3) 5 (1, 43) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.3)
Maury County Urban No 19.4 (13.9, 26.3) 35 (5, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 2.1)
Coffee County Rural No 22.4 (15.4, 31.4) 16 (2, 53) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.7)
Hawkins County Urban No 17.0 (11.4, 24.6) 42 (8, 56) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.4, 4.8)
Sumner County Urban No 16.9 (13.2, 21.3) 43 (16, 54) 15 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.8, 14.5)
Rhea County Rural No 20.7 (12.2, 32.9) 25 (1, 56) 4 rising rising trend 11.5 (4.5, 32.5)
Bedford County Rural No 28.3 (18.7, 41.0) 6 (1, 50) 6
*
*
Carroll County Rural No 21.3 (12.0, 35.1) 20 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Cheatham County Urban No 26.5 (16.1, 40.9) 8 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Claiborne County Rural No 22.7 (13.4, 36.2) 14 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Cocke County Rural No 23.2 (14.3, 35.6) 13 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Fayette County Urban Yes 14.5 (8.7, 23.0) 50 (12, 56) 4
*
*
Grainger County Urban No 30.8 (17.7, 49.8) 2 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Johnson County Rural No 30.7 (17.8, 50.0) 3 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Marshall County Rural No 19.6 (10.9, 32.3) 33 (1, 56) 3
*
*
McNairy County Rural No 29.9 (18.0, 46.7) 4 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Obion County Rural No 21.9 (13.0, 34.8) 18 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Robertson County Urban No 20.2 (13.6, 28.8) 29 (3, 55) 6
*
*
Weakley County Rural No 17.9 (10.4, 29.1) 39 (3, 56) 3
*
*
Benton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 8:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top