Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Prostate, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin N/A No 21.7 (20.9, 22.4) N/A 695 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.7)
United States N/A No 19.2 (19.1, 19.3) N/A 32,830 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Green Lake County Rural No 33.1 (19.9, 52.5) 1 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Dunn County Rural No 30.5 (20.8, 43.2) 2 (1, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 4.3)
Buffalo County Rural No 30.0 (16.9, 51.2) 3 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Marquette County Rural No 29.9 (17.7, 49.2) 4 (1, 58) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 3.2)
Shawano County Rural No 29.4 (21.1, 40.3) 5 (1, 53) 8 stable stable trend 14.4 (-2.2, 37.5)
Rusk County Rural No 29.3 (16.7, 49.6) 6 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Lincoln County Rural No 29.1 (19.2, 43.0) 7 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Columbia County Urban No 27.3 (19.7, 36.9) 8 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.9)
Clark County Rural No 27.0 (17.2, 40.5) 9 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.7, 5.5)
Vilas County Rural No 26.6 (17.8, 40.1) 10 (1, 57) 6
*
*
Bayfield County Rural No 26.3 (15.9, 43.6) 11 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Langlade County Rural No 26.0 (15.5, 42.3) 12 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Portage County Rural No 25.4 (18.6, 33.9) 13 (1, 55) 9 rising rising trend 20.9 (1.1, 37.9)
Iowa County Urban No 25.3 (14.4, 41.5) 14 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Waupaca County Rural No 25.2 (18.4, 34.0) 15 (1, 56) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -1.5)
Dodge County Rural No 25.2 (19.2, 32.4) 16 (1, 53) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Winnebago County Urban No 24.7 (20.3, 29.9) 17 (3, 48) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Sawyer County Rural No 24.0 (13.7, 40.8) 18 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Douglas County Urban No 24.0 (16.0, 34.6) 19 (1, 58) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.6)
Milwaukee County Urban No 23.9 (21.8, 26.3) 20 (9, 39) 95 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 7.5)
Chippewa County Urban No 23.7 (17.2, 32.0) 21 (2, 57) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.5)
Marinette County Rural No 23.7 (16.7, 33.2) 22 (2, 57) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 23.5 (13.7, 38.3) 23 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural No 23.3 (14.5, 37.4) 24 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Barron County Rural No 23.2 (16.1, 32.6) 25 (2, 58) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.0)
Wood County Rural No 23.0 (17.5, 30.0) 26 (4, 56) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 2.0)
La Crosse County Urban No 23.0 (17.9, 29.0) 27 (4, 55) 14 stable stable trend 10.8 (-1.0, 19.9)
Grant County Rural No 22.7 (15.3, 32.6) 28 (1, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.3, -0.2)
Sauk County Rural No 22.7 (16.4, 30.8) 29 (2, 57) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.7)
Sheboygan County Urban No 22.6 (17.8, 28.5) 30 (4, 55) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.8)
Monroe County Rural No 22.5 (14.7, 33.1) 31 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.1, 16.7)
Burnett County Rural No 22.5 (13.1, 39.0) 32 (1, 58) 3 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.2, 2.0)
Manitowoc County Rural No 22.5 (17.0, 29.4) 33 (4, 56) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Polk County Rural No 22.3 (15.3, 31.9) 34 (2, 58) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.0)
St. Croix County Urban No 22.0 (15.7, 29.9) 35 (3, 58) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.5)
Juneau County Rural No 21.9 (13.1, 34.9) 36 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.3)
Dane County Urban No 21.7 (19.1, 24.5) 37 (14, 50) 52 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Pierce County Urban No 21.7 (13.6, 32.8) 38 (2, 58) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.6)
Vernon County Urban No 21.3 (13.2, 33.0) 39 (2, 58) 4
*
*
Jefferson County Rural No 21.0 (15.4, 28.0) 40 (5, 58) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Outagamie County Urban No 21.0 (16.8, 25.8) 41 (9, 56) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Marathon County Urban No 20.5 (16.2, 25.7) 42 (9, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Brown County Urban No 20.3 (16.7, 24.4) 43 (13, 56) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 10.0)
Kenosha County Urban No 20.3 (15.9, 25.6) 44 (9, 57) 15 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.0, 14.5)
Green County Urban No 20.2 (12.7, 30.9) 45 (3, 58) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.0)
Washington County Urban No 20.2 (15.8, 25.5) 46 (9, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Rock County Urban No 19.6 (15.5, 24.6) 47 (12, 57) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Waukesha County Urban No 19.4 (17.0, 22.2) 48 (22, 55) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Eau Claire County Urban No 19.1 (14.1, 25.4) 49 (10, 58) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.5)
Fond du Lac County Urban No 19.0 (14.2, 24.9) 50 (11, 58) 11 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.4)
Ozaukee County Urban No 17.5 (13.0, 23.3) 51 (15, 58) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.5)
Door County Rural No 17.5 (11.4, 27.3) 52 (8, 58) 5
*
*
Calumet County Urban No 17.5 (10.9, 26.7) 53 (6, 58) 4
*
*
Oconto County Urban Yes 16.7 (10.7, 25.4) 54 (10, 58) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.9, -0.8)
Oneida County Rural Yes 16.4 (10.6, 25.2) 55 (10, 58) 5
*
*
Racine County Urban Yes 16.2 (12.8, 20.2) 56 (30, 58) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
Waushara County Rural Yes 15.6 (9.0, 26.5) 57 (9, 58) 3
*
*
Walworth County Rural Yes 14.5 (10.6, 19.6) 58 (33, 58) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.3)
Ashland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trempealeau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top