Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Florida by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Jackson County Rural *** 6.3 (3.8, 9.9) 1 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Escambia County Urban *** 4.8 (3.8, 5.8) 2 (1, 19) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.5)
Santa Rosa County Urban *** 4.5 (3.3, 6.0) 3 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.2)
Citrus County Urban *** 4.4 (3.2, 5.9) 4 (1, 33) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.1)
Columbia County Rural *** 4.4 (2.7, 6.7) 5 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Volusia County Urban *** 4.0 (3.5, 4.6) 6 (2, 24) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Highlands County Urban *** 4.0 (2.7, 5.7) 7 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.3)
Hernando County Urban *** 3.9 (3.1, 5.1) 8 (1, 35) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.6)
Walton County Urban *** 3.9 (2.5, 6.0) 9 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Brevard County Urban *** 3.8 (3.3, 4.4) 10 (3, 26) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Clay County Urban *** 3.8 (2.8, 5.0) 11 (1, 40) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.3)
Marion County Urban *** 3.8 (3.1, 4.5) 12 (2, 30) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.7)
Nassau County Urban *** 3.7 (2.5, 5.5) 13 (1, 42) 6
*
*
Duval County Urban *** 3.6 (3.1, 4.2) 14 (4, 30) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.5)
Flagler County Urban *** 3.6 (2.5, 5.0) 15 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.4)
Pasco County Urban *** 3.5 (3.0, 4.2) 16 (4, 33) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Okaloosa County Urban *** 3.5 (2.6, 4.7) 17 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.9)
Osceola County Urban *** 3.4 (2.7, 4.3) 18 (3, 41) 14
*
*
Lake County Urban *** 3.3 (2.7, 4.0) 19 (5, 39) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Polk County Urban *** 3.2 (2.8, 3.8) 20 (8, 38) 35 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.4)
Putnam County Rural *** 3.1 (1.9, 5.2) 21 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Bay County Urban *** 3.1 (2.2, 4.4) 22 (3, 42) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Seminole County Urban *** 3.1 (2.5, 3.8) 23 (6, 41) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Sarasota County Urban *** 3.1 (2.6, 3.7) 24 (9, 40) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.1)
Leon County Urban *** 3.1 (2.2, 4.1) 25 (4, 42) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.9)
Orange County Urban *** 3.0 (2.7, 3.5) 26 (11, 39) 44 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Charlotte County Urban *** 3.0 (2.2, 4.3) 27 (3, 42) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Indian River County Urban *** 3.0 (2.2, 4.2) 28 (4, 42) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-23.7, 3.3)
St. Lucie County Urban *** 3.0 (2.4, 3.7) 29 (8, 42) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 1.0)
Martin County Urban *** 2.9 (2.1, 4.0) 30 (5, 42) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.9)
Hillsborough County Urban *** 2.9 (2.5, 3.3) 31 (16, 40) 49 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Broward County Urban *** 2.9 (2.6, 3.2) 32 (17, 39) 74 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
St. Johns County Urban *** 2.8 (2.2, 3.7) 33 (8, 42) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 0.0)
Alachua County Urban *** 2.8 (2.0, 3.8) 34 (7, 42) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.9)
Pinellas County Urban *** 2.7 (2.4, 3.1) 35 (18, 42) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Manatee County Urban *** 2.7 (2.2, 3.3) 36 (14, 42) 23 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 1.0)
Sumter County Urban *** 2.7 (2.0, 4.0) 37 (10, 42) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 1.5)
Palm Beach County Urban *** 2.6 (2.3, 2.9) 38 (24, 42) 71 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Miami-Dade County Urban *** 2.6 (2.3, 2.8) 39 (27, 42) 91 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Lee County Urban *** 2.5 (2.1, 2.9) 40 (25, 42) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Monroe County Rural *** 2.3 (1.3, 4.0) 41 (6, 42) 3
*
*
Collier County Urban *** 2.2 (1.8, 2.8) 42 (25, 42) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 1.0)
Baker County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bradford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeSoto County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dixie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gadsden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilchrist County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glades County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gulf County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hendry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Levy County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okeechobee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Suwannee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wakulla County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top