Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Brain & ONS, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend ascending
Carteret County Rural *** 5.7 (3.7, 8.6) 6 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 6.0)
Rowan County Urban *** 5.7 (4.2, 7.5) 7 (1, 43) 11 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.0)
Onslow County Urban *** 4.9 (3.4, 6.7) 15 (2, 51) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.5)
Cumberland County Urban *** 4.0 (3.1, 5.1) 36 (9, 51) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.7)
Randolph County Urban *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.2) 20 (3, 51) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.3)
Henderson County Urban *** 6.9 (5.0, 9.2) 3 (1, 31) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Stanly County Rural *** 5.0 (3.0, 7.8) 13 (1, 52) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.5, 5.7)
Cleveland County Rural *** 5.3 (3.6, 7.5) 10 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 4.0)
Pender County Urban *** 4.5 (2.7, 7.3) 23 (1, 52) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.9)
Davidson County Urban *** 3.6 (2.6, 4.9) 46 (11, 52) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.3)
Wake County Urban *** 4.2 (3.7, 4.8) 30 (13, 45) 50 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.7)
Wayne County Urban *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.5) 24 (2, 52) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.9)
Gaston County Urban *** 4.7 (3.6, 6.0) 19 (4, 49) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Moore County Urban *** 5.2 (3.6, 7.3) 11 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.7)
Alamance County Urban *** 4.0 (2.8, 5.4) 37 (6, 52) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.6)
Forsyth County Urban *** 4.4 (3.6, 5.4) 27 (7, 48) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Brunswick County Urban *** 4.3 (3.1, 5.8) 29 (4, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 3.1)
Lincoln County Urban *** 3.9 (2.5, 5.9) 39 (5, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 3.8)
Buncombe County Urban *** 4.9 (3.9, 6.1) 14 (4, 45) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.4)
Caldwell County Urban *** 3.3 (2.0, 5.4) 50 (7, 52) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 3.0)
Harnett County Rural *** 3.4 (2.2, 5.1) 48 (8, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.2)
Rockingham County Urban *** 3.0 (1.8, 4.9) 52 (9, 52) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.3)
Craven County Rural *** 5.5 (3.8, 7.6) 8 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 3.0)
Union County Urban *** 4.3 (3.2, 5.6) 28 (5, 51) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 2.1)
Johnston County Urban *** 3.7 (2.7, 5.0) 43 (10, 52) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.5)
New Hanover County Urban *** 4.5 (3.4, 5.8) 26 (5, 51) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.5)
Robeson County Rural *** 3.3 (2.1, 5.1) 49 (9, 52) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Durham County Urban *** 3.2 (2.4, 4.2) 51 (21, 52) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 1.1)
Guilford County Urban *** 3.6 (3.0, 4.4) 45 (18, 52) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Iredell County Urban *** 3.8 (2.7, 5.1) 40 (9, 52) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.2)
Pitt County Urban *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.2) 21 (2, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.8, 2.9)
Burke County Urban *** 4.0 (2.7, 6.0) 35 (5, 52) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.7)
Nash County Urban *** 3.8 (2.3, 5.8) 41 (5, 52) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 2.0)
Surry County Rural *** 4.5 (2.7, 6.9) 25 (2, 52) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.0)
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 3.5 (3.0, 4.0) 47 (26, 52) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.2)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 4.1 (3.0, 5.5) 34 (6, 51) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.5)
Catawba County Urban *** 4.2 (3.0, 5.7) 31 (5, 52) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
Orange County Urban *** 4.2 (2.9, 5.9) 32 (4, 52) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 1.0)
Wilkes County Rural *** 3.9 (2.3, 6.4) 38 (3, 52) 4 falling falling trend -11.9 (-35.6, -0.1)
Beaufort County Rural *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.4) 12 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Chatham County Urban *** 4.8 (3.2, 7.2) 16 (1, 52) 6
*
*
Davie County Urban *** 5.3 (2.9, 9.0) 9 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Duplin County Rural *** 7.5 (4.4, 11.8) 1 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Franklin County Urban *** 4.5 (2.8, 7.1) 22 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Granville County Rural *** 4.7 (2.7, 7.7) 17 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Haywood County Rural *** 3.7 (2.2, 6.1) 42 (4, 52) 3
*
*
Lenoir County Rural *** 3.7 (2.1, 6.2) 44 (4, 52) 3
*
*
Person County Urban *** 6.9 (4.0, 11.2) 2 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Rutherford County Rural *** 6.3 (4.0, 9.4) 5 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Sampson County Rural *** 4.7 (2.8, 7.6) 18 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Stokes County Urban *** 6.8 (4.0, 10.8) 4 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Wilson County Rural *** 4.1 (2.5, 6.4) 33 (3, 52) 4
*
*
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2026 11:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top