Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 4.9 (4.7, 5.0) N/A 619 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
United States N/A *** 4.9 (4.9, 4.9) N/A 20,047 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
McDowell County Rural *** 7.7 (5.0, 11.5) 1 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Pender County Urban *** 7.4 (4.9, 10.8) 2 (1, 56) 6
*
*
Alamance County Urban *** 7.2 (5.7, 9.1) 3 (1, 33) 15 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 19.7)
Person County Urban *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.5) 4 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 2.5)
Bladen County Rural *** 6.8 (3.9, 11.5) 5 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Caldwell County Urban *** 6.6 (4.6, 9.3) 6 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.4)
Columbus County Rural *** 6.6 (4.2, 10.1) 7 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.4)
Wayne County Urban *** 6.6 (4.8, 8.9) 8 (1, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Rutherford County Rural *** 6.5 (4.3, 9.6) 9 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.5)
Stanly County Rural *** 6.3 (4.1, 9.4) 10 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.3)
Davie County Urban *** 6.2 (3.8, 9.8) 11 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Vance County Rural *** 6.1 (3.5, 10.0) 12 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Moore County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 8.1) 13 (1, 57) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Alexander County Urban *** 6.0 (3.4, 10.0) 14 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Cumberland County Urban *** 6.0 (4.8, 7.3) 15 (2, 46) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Lincoln County Urban *** 6.0 (4.1, 8.4) 16 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.5)
Halifax County Rural *** 5.9 (3.6, 9.3) 17 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Duplin County Rural *** 5.7 (3.5, 9.1) 18 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Union County Urban *** 5.6 (4.4, 7.2) 19 (3, 55) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.8)
Wilson County Rural *** 5.4 (3.5, 7.9) 20 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.0)
Brunswick County Urban *** 5.3 (4.1, 7.0) 21 (4, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.9)
Johnston County Urban *** 5.3 (3.9, 7.0) 22 (4, 59) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.7)
Lenoir County Rural *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.4) 23 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 2.9)
New Hanover County Urban *** 5.3 (4.2, 6.6) 24 (5, 56) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.7)
Transylvania County Rural *** 5.1 (2.8, 9.2) 25 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Forsyth County Urban *** 5.1 (4.2, 6.1) 26 (8, 55) 23 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Catawba County Urban *** 5.1 (3.8, 6.7) 27 (4, 59) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.5)
Surry County Rural *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.5) 28 (2, 60) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.9)
Nash County Urban *** 5.0 (3.4, 7.2) 29 (3, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.6)
Sampson County Rural *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.0) 30 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Gaston County Urban *** 5.0 (3.8, 6.3) 31 (7, 58) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Franklin County Urban *** 5.0 (3.0, 7.7) 32 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Haywood County Rural *** 4.9 (3.3, 7.4) 33 (2, 60) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.4)
Onslow County Urban *** 4.7 (3.3, 6.5) 34 (4, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.3)
Henderson County Urban *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 35 (8, 60) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.2)
Rowan County Urban *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.3) 36 (6, 60) 8 falling falling trend -17.6 (-31.0, -8.8)
Rockingham County Urban *** 4.6 (3.2, 6.6) 37 (6, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.2)
Davidson County Urban *** 4.6 (3.4, 6.1) 38 (8, 60) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.3)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 4.6 (3.4, 6.0) 39 (8, 60) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Harnett County Rural *** 4.6 (3.1, 6.5) 40 (5, 60) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.1)
Macon County Rural *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.9) 41 (2, 60) 3
*
*
Burke County Urban *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.5) 42 (6, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.5)
Lee County Rural *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.2) 43 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.4)
Robeson County Rural *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.5) 44 (5, 60) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.6)
Pitt County Urban *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.1) 45 (7, 60) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Guilford County Urban *** 4.5 (3.7, 5.3) 46 (18, 58) 27 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Beaufort County Rural *** 4.5 (2.5, 7.6) 47 (2, 60) 3
*
*
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 4.4 (3.8, 5.1) 48 (22, 57) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Craven County Rural *** 4.4 (3.0, 6.3) 49 (7, 60) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.6)
Randolph County Urban *** 4.4 (3.2, 6.0) 50 (9, 60) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Stokes County Urban *** 4.3 (2.5, 7.4) 51 (3, 60) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 1.1)
Buncombe County Urban *** 4.2 (3.4, 5.3) 52 (19, 60) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Wilkes County Rural *** 4.2 (2.6, 6.5) 53 (6, 60) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3)
Orange County Urban *** 4.2 (2.9, 5.9) 54 (9, 60) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Carteret County Rural *** 4.2 (2.7, 6.4) 55 (7, 60) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -1.2)
Cleveland County Rural *** 4.1 (2.7, 6.1) 56 (9, 60) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 0.9)
Chatham County Urban *** 4.1 (2.8, 6.0) 57 (10, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.3)
Iredell County Urban *** 3.9 (2.9, 5.3) 58 (14, 60) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.7, 0.1)
Wake County Urban *** 3.9 (3.4, 4.5) 59 (32, 60) 42 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.1)
Durham County Urban *** 3.7 (2.9, 4.8) 60 (24, 60) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 10:21 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top