Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 4.9 (4.7, 5.0) N/A 619 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
United States N/A *** 4.9 (4.9, 4.9) N/A 20,047 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Rowan County Urban *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.3) 36 (6, 60) 8 falling falling trend -17.6 (-31.0, -8.8)
Surry County Rural *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.5) 28 (2, 60) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.9)
Carteret County Rural *** 4.2 (2.7, 6.4) 55 (7, 60) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -1.2)
Harnett County Rural *** 4.6 (3.1, 6.5) 40 (5, 60) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.1)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 4.6 (3.4, 6.0) 39 (8, 60) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Pitt County Urban *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.1) 45 (7, 60) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Catawba County Urban *** 5.1 (3.8, 6.7) 27 (4, 59) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.5)
Onslow County Urban *** 4.7 (3.3, 6.5) 34 (4, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.3)
Craven County Rural *** 4.4 (3.0, 6.3) 49 (7, 60) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.6)
Durham County Urban *** 3.7 (2.9, 4.8) 60 (24, 60) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Randolph County Urban *** 4.4 (3.2, 6.0) 50 (9, 60) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Guilford County Urban *** 4.5 (3.7, 5.3) 46 (18, 58) 27 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Iredell County Urban *** 3.9 (2.9, 5.3) 58 (14, 60) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.7, 0.1)
Wake County Urban *** 3.9 (3.4, 4.5) 59 (32, 60) 42 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.1)
Cleveland County Rural *** 4.1 (2.7, 6.1) 56 (9, 60) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.7, 0.9)
Davidson County Urban *** 4.6 (3.4, 6.1) 38 (8, 60) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.3)
Henderson County Urban *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 35 (8, 60) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.2)
Union County Urban *** 5.6 (4.4, 7.2) 19 (3, 55) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.8)
Buncombe County Urban *** 4.2 (3.4, 5.3) 52 (19, 60) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Forsyth County Urban *** 5.1 (4.2, 6.1) 26 (8, 55) 23 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Rockingham County Urban *** 4.6 (3.2, 6.6) 37 (6, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.2)
Stokes County Urban *** 4.3 (2.5, 7.4) 51 (3, 60) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 1.1)
Wilson County Rural *** 5.4 (3.5, 7.9) 20 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.0)
Gaston County Urban *** 5.0 (3.8, 6.3) 31 (7, 58) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 4.4 (3.8, 5.1) 48 (22, 57) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Wilkes County Rural *** 4.2 (2.6, 6.5) 53 (6, 60) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3)
Chatham County Urban *** 4.1 (2.8, 6.0) 57 (10, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.3)
Nash County Urban *** 5.0 (3.4, 7.2) 29 (3, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.6)
Burke County Urban *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.5) 42 (6, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.5)
Robeson County Rural *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.5) 44 (5, 60) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.6)
Lee County Rural *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.2) 43 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.4)
Lincoln County Urban *** 6.0 (4.1, 8.4) 16 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.5)
Orange County Urban *** 4.2 (2.9, 5.9) 54 (9, 60) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Person County Urban *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.5) 4 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 2.5)
Johnston County Urban *** 5.3 (3.9, 7.0) 22 (4, 59) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.7)
Moore County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 8.1) 13 (1, 57) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
New Hanover County Urban *** 5.3 (4.2, 6.6) 24 (5, 56) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.7)
Stanly County Rural *** 6.3 (4.1, 9.4) 10 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.3)
Brunswick County Urban *** 5.3 (4.1, 7.0) 21 (4, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.9)
Cumberland County Urban *** 6.0 (4.8, 7.3) 15 (2, 46) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Wayne County Urban *** 6.6 (4.8, 8.9) 8 (1, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.5)
Haywood County Rural *** 4.9 (3.3, 7.4) 33 (2, 60) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.4)
Lenoir County Rural *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.4) 23 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 2.9)
Rutherford County Rural *** 6.5 (4.3, 9.6) 9 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.5)
Caldwell County Urban *** 6.6 (4.6, 9.3) 6 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.4)
Columbus County Rural *** 6.6 (4.2, 10.1) 7 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.4)
Alamance County Urban *** 7.2 (5.7, 9.1) 3 (1, 33) 15 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 19.7)
Alexander County Urban *** 6.0 (3.4, 10.0) 14 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Beaufort County Rural *** 4.5 (2.5, 7.6) 47 (2, 60) 3
*
*
Bladen County Rural *** 6.8 (3.9, 11.5) 5 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Davie County Urban *** 6.2 (3.8, 9.8) 11 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Duplin County Rural *** 5.7 (3.5, 9.1) 18 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Franklin County Urban *** 5.0 (3.0, 7.7) 32 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Halifax County Rural *** 5.9 (3.6, 9.3) 17 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Macon County Rural *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.9) 41 (2, 60) 3
*
*
McDowell County Rural *** 7.7 (5.0, 11.5) 1 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Pender County Urban *** 7.4 (4.9, 10.8) 2 (1, 56) 6
*
*
Sampson County Rural *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.0) 30 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Transylvania County Rural *** 5.1 (2.8, 9.2) 25 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Vance County Rural *** 6.1 (3.5, 10.0) 12 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 5:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top