Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A *** 5.6 (5.4, 5.9) N/A 457 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -0.6)
United States N/A *** 4.9 (4.9, 4.9) N/A 20,047 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Dubois County Rural *** 8.7 (5.6, 13.0) 1 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 3.2)
Henry County Rural *** 7.9 (5.2, 11.8) 2 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Huntington County Rural *** 7.8 (4.9, 12.2) 3 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.2)
Harrison County Urban *** 7.8 (4.7, 12.4) 4 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Daviess County Rural *** 7.7 (4.4, 12.8) 5 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 7.7 (4.7, 11.9) 6 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.0)
Whitley County Urban *** 7.7 (4.4, 12.6) 7 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Boone County Urban *** 7.7 (5.1, 11.0) 8 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.4)
Gibson County Rural *** 7.6 (4.3, 12.7) 9 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural *** 7.5 (4.2, 12.4) 10 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 2.9)
Wayne County Rural *** 7.1 (4.8, 10.3) 11 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Miami County Rural *** 7.1 (4.0, 11.9) 12 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.9, 26.8)
Greene County Rural *** 7.0 (4.0, 11.7) 13 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.1, 2.0)
Dearborn County Urban *** 6.9 (4.3, 10.5) 14 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Putnam County Rural *** 6.8 (3.8, 11.3) 15 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.8)
DeKalb County Rural *** 6.7 (3.8, 10.9) 16 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.6)
Tippecanoe County Urban *** 6.4 (4.7, 8.4) 17 (3, 41) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.4)
Delaware County Urban *** 6.4 (4.6, 8.6) 18 (2, 41) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Vanderburgh County Urban *** 6.3 (4.9, 8.0) 19 (4, 39) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -1.4)
Vigo County Urban *** 6.2 (4.4, 8.6) 20 (2, 43) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.7)
Elkhart County Urban *** 6.0 (4.7, 7.6) 21 (5, 41) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Morgan County Urban *** 6.0 (3.9, 8.9) 22 (2, 43) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Shelby County Urban *** 5.9 (3.4, 9.6) 23 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Hancock County Urban *** 5.8 (3.8, 8.4) 24 (3, 43) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.8, -1.0)
Marion County Urban *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.5) 25 (11, 36) 53 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
St. Joseph County Urban *** 5.8 (4.6, 7.1) 26 (8, 41) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Lawrence County Rural *** 5.8 (3.4, 9.3) 27 (2, 43) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 0.8)
Hendricks County Urban *** 5.7 (4.3, 7.5) 28 (5, 43) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Madison County Urban *** 5.7 (4.1, 7.6) 29 (5, 43) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -1.0)
Grant County Rural *** 5.7 (3.8, 8.4) 30 (4, 43) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.5, -0.4)
Marshall County Rural *** 5.7 (3.3, 9.1) 31 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Allen County Urban *** 5.7 (4.7, 6.8) 32 (10, 40) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Johnson County Urban *** 5.5 (4.1, 7.3) 33 (7, 43) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.1)
Floyd County Urban *** 5.4 (3.6, 7.9) 34 (4, 43) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.5)
Monroe County Urban *** 5.2 (3.6, 7.2) 35 (6, 43) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.9)
Howard County Urban *** 5.1 (3.4, 7.5) 36 (5, 43) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 0.6)
Bartholomew County Urban *** 4.9 (3.1, 7.3) 37 (6, 43) 5 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.1, -3.2)
Hamilton County Urban *** 4.6 (3.6, 5.7) 38 (19, 43) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.2)
Porter County Urban *** 4.5 (3.3, 6.0) 39 (16, 43) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -1.0)
Lake County Urban *** 4.4 (3.7, 5.3) 40 (25, 43) 28 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.5)
Clark County Urban *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.2) 41 (13, 43) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.4)
LaPorte County Urban *** 4.2 (2.8, 6.1) 42 (15, 43) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.3, -0.1)
Kosciusko County Rural *** 4.1 (2.6, 6.3) 43 (13, 43) 4
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jennings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steuben County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warrick County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top