Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

Leukemia, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A *** 5.4 (5.3, 5.5) N/A 2,368 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.9)
United States N/A *** 5.8 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,489 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Yuba County Urban *** 8.8 (6.0, 12.4) 1 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Mendocino County Rural *** 8.3 (6.2, 10.9) 2 (1, 31) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 17.8)
Siskiyou County Rural *** 7.8 (4.9, 12.1) 3 (1, 46) 5
*
*
Butte County Urban *** 7.4 (6.0, 9.0) 4 (1, 33) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.5)
San Benito County Urban *** 7.0 (4.4, 10.6) 5 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Humboldt County Rural *** 6.3 (4.7, 8.3) 6 (1, 45) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.6)
El Dorado County Urban *** 6.2 (4.9, 7.8) 7 (2, 42) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.1)
Santa Barbara County Urban *** 6.2 (5.3, 7.3) 8 (2, 38) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Solano County Urban *** 6.2 (5.3, 7.2) 9 (3, 37) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Merced County Urban *** 6.1 (4.8, 7.7) 10 (2, 43) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
San Luis Obispo County Urban *** 6.0 (4.9, 7.3) 11 (3, 41) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Tehama County Rural *** 6.0 (4.0, 8.9) 12 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.6)
Madera County Urban *** 6.0 (4.4, 8.0) 13 (1, 46) 9 falling falling trend -27.5 (-44.3, -6.0)
Imperial County Urban *** 5.9 (4.4, 7.7) 14 (2, 46) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 2.2)
Sutter County Urban *** 5.8 (4.1, 8.1) 15 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.7)
Kern County Urban *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.6) 16 (5, 39) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Sonoma County Urban *** 5.8 (5.0, 6.7) 17 (4, 40) 40 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
San Bernardino County Urban *** 5.8 (5.3, 6.3) 18 (7, 35) 116 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 0.0)
Placer County Urban *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.7) 19 (4, 42) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Calaveras County Rural *** 5.7 (3.5, 9.1) 20 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.7)
Stanislaus County Urban *** 5.6 (4.8, 6.6) 21 (4, 42) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Tulare County Urban *** 5.6 (4.7, 6.8) 22 (4, 43) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
San Diego County Urban *** 5.6 (5.3, 6.0) 23 (10, 34) 205 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Amador County Rural *** 5.6 (3.4, 9.2) 24 (1, 46) 4
*
*
San Joaquin County Urban *** 5.5 (4.8, 6.3) 25 (6, 42) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Fresno County Urban *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.2) 26 (7, 41) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Orange County Urban *** 5.5 (5.2, 5.8) 27 (12, 36) 204 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Shasta County Urban *** 5.5 (4.2, 7.0) 28 (3, 46) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-14.6, -1.6)
Lake County Rural *** 5.4 (3.5, 8.0) 29 (1, 46) 5
*
*
Ventura County Urban *** 5.4 (4.7, 6.1) 30 (9, 42) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Los Angeles County Urban *** 5.3 (5.1, 5.5) 31 (18, 36) 578 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Riverside County Urban *** 5.3 (4.9, 5.7) 32 (14, 39) 145 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Sacramento County Urban *** 5.3 (4.8, 5.8) 33 (12, 40) 90 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Napa County Urban *** 5.2 (3.9, 6.9) 34 (3, 46) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
Contra Costa County Urban *** 5.2 (4.7, 5.8) 35 (12, 42) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Tuolumne County Rural *** 5.1 (3.2, 8.0) 36 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 0.6)
Yolo County Urban *** 5.0 (3.7, 6.5) 37 (5, 46) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Santa Clara County Urban *** 4.9 (4.5, 5.3) 38 (22, 44) 103 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Marin County Urban *** 4.8 (3.9, 5.9) 39 (9, 46) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Nevada County Rural *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.4) 40 (5, 46) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.7)
Santa Cruz County Urban *** 4.6 (3.5, 5.8) 41 (10, 46) 14 falling falling trend -20.7 (-38.3, -0.7)
Alameda County Urban *** 4.5 (4.1, 5.0) 42 (30, 46) 83 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Monterey County Urban *** 4.5 (3.7, 5.4) 43 (18, 46) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Kings County Urban *** 4.3 (2.8, 6.2) 44 (6, 46) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.5)
San Mateo County Urban *** 4.1 (3.6, 4.8) 45 (32, 46) 39 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.4)
San Francisco County Urban *** 3.9 (3.4, 4.5) 46 (37, 46) 43 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 2:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top