Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Leukemia, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A *** 6.0 (5.8, 6.2) N/A 748 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
United States N/A *** 5.8 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,489 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Johnston County Urban *** 4.1 (3.0, 5.6) 63 (30, 63) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.4)
Macon County Rural *** 4.4 (2.5, 7.8) 62 (7, 63) 3 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.8, 0.0)
Beaufort County Rural *** 4.6 (2.5, 8.0) 61 (5, 63) 3
*
*
Nash County Urban *** 4.6 (3.1, 6.6) 60 (16, 63) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.3)
Durham County Urban *** 4.9 (3.9, 6.1) 59 (21, 63) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Granville County Rural *** 4.9 (2.9, 7.8) 58 (5, 63) 4
*
*
Duplin County Rural *** 4.9 (2.9, 8.1) 57 (3, 63) 3
*
*
Orange County Urban *** 5.0 (3.5, 6.9) 56 (11, 63) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.1)
Edgecombe County Urban *** 5.0 (3.0, 8.1) 55 (4, 63) 3
*
*
Caldwell County Urban *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.5) 54 (7, 63) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 0.9)
Cabarrus County Urban *** 5.3 (4.0, 6.8) 53 (13, 63) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.4)
Lee County Rural *** 5.3 (3.2, 8.2) 52 (4, 63) 4
*
*
Wilson County Rural *** 5.3 (3.5, 7.8) 51 (4, 63) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.4, 0.2)
Randolph County Urban *** 5.3 (3.9, 7.1) 50 (9, 63) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
Lenoir County Rural *** 5.3 (3.1, 8.5) 49 (3, 63) 4 falling falling trend -21.7 (-42.6, -5.2)
Wake County Urban *** 5.4 (4.8, 6.1) 48 (23, 59) 55 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Stokes County Urban *** 5.5 (3.3, 8.9) 47 (3, 63) 4
*
*
Buncombe County Urban *** 5.6 (4.6, 6.8) 46 (13, 61) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Pitt County Urban *** 5.7 (4.2, 7.5) 45 (6, 63) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.2)
Union County Urban *** 5.7 (4.4, 7.2) 44 (9, 62) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 1.0)
Cleveland County Rural *** 5.7 (3.9, 8.0) 43 (4, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.9, 2.8)
Columbus County Rural *** 5.7 (3.6, 8.8) 42 (3, 63) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.6)
Mecklenburg County Urban *** 5.7 (5.0, 6.4) 41 (19, 57) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Transylvania County Rural *** 5.7 (3.4, 9.7) 40 (2, 63) 4
*
*
Catawba County Urban *** 5.8 (4.4, 7.5) 39 (7, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Harnett County Rural *** 5.9 (4.2, 8.0) 38 (4, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.6)
Guilford County Urban *** 5.9 (5.1, 6.9) 37 (13, 56) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Davie County Urban *** 5.9 (3.7, 9.4) 36 (2, 63) 4
*
*
Cumberland County Urban *** 6.0 (4.8, 7.3) 35 (8, 60) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Craven County Rural *** 6.1 (4.4, 8.2) 34 (3, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.8)
Robeson County Rural *** 6.1 (4.3, 8.3) 33 (3, 63) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.1)
Iredell County Urban *** 6.1 (4.7, 7.8) 32 (5, 61) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Brunswick County Urban *** 6.2 (4.7, 8.0) 31 (5, 60) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.9)
Forsyth County Urban *** 6.2 (5.2, 7.3) 30 (9, 57) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Moore County Urban *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 29 (3, 62) 10 stable stable trend 5.3 (-2.1, 25.6)
Person County Urban *** 6.2 (3.6, 10.3) 28 (1, 63) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.8)
Onslow County Urban *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 27 (3, 62) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.8)
Rutherford County Rural *** 6.3 (4.3, 9.1) 26 (2, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.4)
New Hanover County Urban *** 6.3 (5.1, 7.8) 25 (6, 58) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Wayne County Urban *** 6.3 (4.6, 8.6) 24 (3, 62) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.0)
Carteret County Rural *** 6.4 (4.4, 9.2) 23 (2, 63) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.2)
Chatham County Urban *** 6.5 (4.7, 8.9) 22 (2, 62) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.9)
Stanly County Rural *** 6.7 (4.4, 9.9) 21 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Lincoln County Urban *** 6.8 (4.8, 9.5) 20 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.1)
Henderson County Urban *** 6.8 (5.2, 8.9) 19 (2, 59) 13 stable stable trend 10.9 (-0.1, 37.7)
Haywood County Rural *** 7.0 (4.7, 10.1) 18 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 5.8)
Pender County Urban *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.2) 17 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.6)
Davidson County Urban *** 7.0 (5.5, 8.8) 16 (2, 55) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Gaston County Urban *** 7.1 (5.7, 8.7) 15 (2, 52) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Rowan County Urban *** 7.2 (5.5, 9.2) 14 (2, 56) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.7)
Sampson County Rural *** 7.4 (4.8, 11.0) 13 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 5.2)
Richmond County Rural *** 7.5 (4.6, 11.8) 12 (1, 63) 4 falling falling trend -7.6 (-28.8, -2.0)
Surry County Rural *** 7.6 (5.3, 10.5) 11 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Rockingham County Urban *** 7.7 (5.6, 10.3) 10 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Hoke County Urban *** 7.7 (4.3, 12.6) 9 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Alamance County Urban *** 7.7 (6.1, 9.6) 8 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4)
Burke County Urban *** 7.7 (5.6, 10.5) 7 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.4)
Wilkes County Rural *** 7.8 (5.6, 10.7) 6 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.8)
Yadkin County Urban *** 8.0 (4.8, 12.7) 5 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Halifax County Rural *** 8.2 (5.5, 12.1) 4 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.5)
Ashe County Rural *** 8.5 (5.3, 13.7) 3 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.4)
Cherokee County Rural *** 10.1 (6.3, 15.9) 2 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Franklin County Urban *** 10.4 (7.5, 14.2) 1 (1, 41) 8 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.5, 6.5)
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vance County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 10:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top