Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia No 169.0 (155.1, 183.6) 24 (5, 37) 120 falling falling trend -7.1 (-12.1, -2.1)
New York No 131.1 (129.4, 132.9) 43 (39, 47) 4,500 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.7)
Illinois No 183.1 (180.3, 185.8) 9 (6, 13) 3,581 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -2.2)
New Jersey No 152.2 (149.1, 155.3) 33 (30, 39) 1,986 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.6, -2.2)
Tennessee No 179.5 (175.7, 183.2) 12 (7, 18) 1,963 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -2.2)
Pennsylvania No 180.3 (177.2, 183.5) 11 (7, 17) 2,618 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -1.9)
Alabama No 169.8 (166.7, 173.0) 22 (16, 28) 2,377 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -2.0)
Alaska No 148.7 (121.5, 179.6) 35 (4, 49) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Kansas No 171.8 (162.5, 181.6) 19 (7, 31) 273 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Kentucky No 182.9 (176.4, 189.5) 10 (4, 19) 653 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Texas No 169.0 (166.9, 171.2) 23 (18, 28) 5,348 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Indiana No 176.9 (171.9, 182.0) 13 (8, 24) 1,047 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Maryland No 158.6 (156.1, 161.2) 29 (26, 35) 3,238 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -1.9)
Michigan No 174.3 (171.2, 177.4) 16 (12, 23) 2,602 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -1.8)
Nebraska No 172.0 (158.0, 186.8) 18 (3, 35) 126 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
New Mexico No 134.6 (119.6, 150.9) 41 (30, 49) 64 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Ohio No 173.9 (170.8, 176.9) 17 (12, 25) 2,701 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Colorado No 147.4 (139.6, 155.5) 37 (29, 43) 298 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Georgia No 161.5 (159.4, 163.6) 28 (25, 33) 5,130 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Louisiana No 189.8 (186.5, 193.1) 6 (3, 9) 2,828 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
New Hampshire No 128.8 (100.6, 161.7) 44 (16, 51) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.9)
Washington No 157.8 (150.4, 165.4) 31 (23, 38) 409 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
California No 170.9 (168.6, 173.2) 20 (16, 27) 4,430 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Minnesota No 158.0 (150.0, 166.2) 30 (21, 39) 364 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.2)
Missouri No 184.1 (179.5, 188.8) 8 (4, 14) 1,309 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Arkansas No 186.8 (180.9, 192.8) 7 (3, 14) 847 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Connecticut No 151.2 (145.5, 157.0) 34 (29, 40) 565 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Delaware No 168.4 (160.8, 176.3) 25 (11, 32) 397 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Florida No 148.2 (146.3, 150.1) 36 (33, 41) 5,071 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.0)
South Carolina No 175.6 (172.5, 178.7) 15 (11, 22) 2,614 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
District of Columbia No 192.3 (185.8, 199.0) 4 (2, 10) 701 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
North Carolina No 176.6 (174.1, 179.1) 14 (11, 20) 4,207 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Oregon No 162.8 (149.5, 177.0) 27 (9, 40) 123 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Iowa No 198.0 (182.1, 214.8) 2 (1, 17) 138 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Oklahoma No 190.9 (183.3, 198.7) 5 (2, 12) 526 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Utah No 133.2 (108.6, 161.1) 42 (16, 50) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
Mississippi No 195.5 (191.6, 199.4) 3 (2, 6) 2,163 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Virginia No 170.1 (167.3, 172.9) 21 (16, 28) 3,051 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.1, 0.2)
Arizona No 156.3 (149.7, 163.1) 32 (25, 39) 467 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.3)
Hawaii Yes 122.0 (100.6, 146.2) 47 (30, 51) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.7)
Wisconsin No 211.5 (203.6, 219.7) 1 (1, 3) 598 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Maine No 123.1 (95.5, 155.5) 46 (19, 51) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.6)
Nevada No 167.3 (160.3, 174.5) 26 (13, 32) 474 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.2, 1.3)
Massachusetts No 137.4 (132.6, 142.2) 39 (37, 45) 675 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Rhode Island No 127.4 (114.8, 140.8) 45 (37, 50) 81 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 5.9)
Montana No 135.0 (87.5, 196.6) 40 (1, 51) 6
*
*
North Dakota Yes 101.2 (62.2, 152.3) 50 (11, 51) 8
*
*
Vermont No 144.2 (99.8, 199.6) 38 (1, 51) 8
*
*
Idaho Yes 104.3 (75.8, 139.5) 49 (31, 51) 11
*
*
South Dakota Yes 77.5 (48.0, 116.2) 51 (42, 51) 7
*
*
Wyoming Yes 112.9 (76.4, 159.9) 48 (11, 51) 7
*
*
Puerto Rico ***
¶¶¶
N/A
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 3:25 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top