Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Asian/Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States Yes 93.1 (92.5, 93.6) N/A 20,657 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
New Hampshire Yes 57.3 (45.8, 70.7) 51 (43, 51) 19 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -0.4)
West Virginia Yes 62.2 (46.8, 81.2) 50 (27, 51) 11
*
*
Connecticut Yes 68.4 (62.2, 74.9) 49 (41, 51) 99 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -2.0)
New Jersey Yes 71.8 (69.4, 74.3) 48 (42, 50) 685 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Michigan Yes 74.6 (70.1, 79.3) 47 (39, 50) 220 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.0)
Delaware Yes 77.0 (65.4, 90.2) 46 (18, 51) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.6)
District of Columbia Yes 77.1 (60.8, 96.4) 45 (8, 51) 15
*
*
New Mexico Yes 77.3 (65.8, 90.4) 44 (17, 51) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.2)
Alabama Yes 77.7 (68.3, 88.1) 43 (21, 50) 54 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
South Carolina Yes 78.3 (70.1, 87.1) 42 (22, 50) 72 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.1)
North Dakota Yes 80.4 (48.1, 123.7) 41 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Indiana Yes 81.1 (73.6, 89.2) 40 (21, 48) 98 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.5)
Ohio Yes 81.7 (76.5, 87.2) 39 (25, 47) 196 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Illinois Yes 82.5 (79.6, 85.4) 38 (29, 45) 651 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
New York Yes 83.4 (81.6, 85.2) 37 (29, 43) 1,711 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -1.2)
Maryland Yes 83.6 (79.8, 87.4) 36 (26, 44) 388 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.2)
Texas Yes 84.9 (82.6, 87.2) 35 (26, 41) 1,190 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -0.9)
Missouri Yes 86.2 (78.7, 94.3) 34 (15, 46) 102 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.2, 0.2)
Florida Yes 86.3 (83.3, 89.2) 33 (23, 41) 695 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.0)
North Carolina Yes 86.3 (81.0, 91.8) 32 (18, 44) 224 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.2, 0.1)
Virginia Yes 86.7 (83.3, 90.2) 31 (21, 41) 514 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Pennsylvania Yes 88.8 (84.8, 93.0) 30 (17, 39) 384 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Mississippi Yes 89.2 (74.5, 105.9) 29 (4, 49) 28 falling falling trend -5.5 (-18.7, -1.4)
Colorado Yes 90.6 (84.4, 97.1) 28 (12, 41) 170 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.5)
Idaho Yes 91.2 (75.8, 108.6) 27 (2, 49) 27 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.5)
Georgia Yes 91.4 (87.1, 95.8) 26 (14, 35) 385 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Tennessee Yes 91.6 (83.6, 100.2) 25 (9, 42) 105 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.2)
Maine Yes 92.4 (72.9, 115.4) 24 (1, 50) 16
*
*
Arizona Yes 93.3 (88.1, 98.7) 23 (11, 33) 257 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.6)
Massachusetts Yes 93.6 (89.4, 97.9) 22 (12, 31) 393 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Wisconsin Yes 94.3 (85.9, 103.2) 21 (7, 40) 104 falling falling trend -3.6 (-9.4, -1.1)
Montana Yes 95.5 (68.4, 129.3) 20 (1, 51) 9
*
*
Nebraska Yes 96.0 (81.4, 112.3) 19 (2, 46) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.2)
Kansas Yes 96.5 (86.1, 107.7) 18 (4, 41) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.7)
Rhode Island Yes 97.7 (82.2, 115.2) 17 (1, 46) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 1.3)
Kentucky Yes 98.1 (86.1, 111.3) 16 (2, 42) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.6, 0.2)
Louisiana Yes 99.1 (89.6, 109.3) 15 (3, 35) 86 falling falling trend -7.5 (-12.2, -1.3)
Alaska Yes 99.3 (87.3, 112.5) 14 (1, 40) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
California Yes 99.6 (98.6, 100.6) 13 (9, 20) 7,810 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Vermont Yes 99.9 (69.8, 137.4) 12 (1, 51) 8
*
*
Arkansas Yes 100.7 (87.3, 115.4) 11 (1, 40) 46 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.6)
Nevada Yes 102.1 (97.5, 106.8) 10 (5, 21) 406 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Washington Yes 102.3 (99.1, 105.6) 9 (6, 19) 788 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Oregon Yes 102.5 (96.3, 108.9) 8 (4, 24) 220 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
South Dakota Yes 104.0 (70.3, 147.0) 7 (1, 51) 8
*
*
Hawaii Yes 112.9 (110.4, 115.4) 6 (1, 9) 1,663 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Iowa Yes 113.4 (99.8, 128.1) 5 (1, 24) 60 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.6)
Minnesota Yes 114.2 (107.0, 121.7) 4 (1, 11) 211 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Oklahoma Yes 114.3 (103.3, 126.0) 3 (1, 17) 90 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Utah Yes 115.7 (105.5, 126.5) 2 (1, 15) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Wyoming Yes 118.2 (79.9, 167.8) 1 (1, 50) 6
*
*
Puerto Rico ***
¶¶¶
N/A
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 5:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top