Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report by State

Colon & Rectum, 2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland No 11.5 (10.8, 12.3) 44 (25, 49) 908 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -1.4)
District of Columbia No 11.6 (9.1, 14.5) 42 (6, 51) 79 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.6)
Massachusetts No 9.7 (9.0, 10.3) 51 (46, 51) 887 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -1.5)
New York No 10.6 (10.2, 11.0) 49 (43, 51) 2,771 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.1, -2.5)
New Jersey No 11.6 (10.9, 12.2) 43 (28, 48) 1,400 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -1.2)
Rhode Island No 10.8 (9.2, 12.6) 46 (18, 51) 168 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Delaware No 12.2 (10.4, 14.3) 34 (8, 51) 176 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
North Dakota No 12.9 (10.6, 15.4) 25 (3, 51) 125 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
New Hampshire No 10.7 (9.3, 12.4) 48 (20, 51) 210 stable stable trend -2.3 (-3.2, 1.3)
Iowa No 12.9 (11.8, 14.0) 23 (10, 44) 546 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Nevada No 13.8 (12.7, 15.1) 14 (6, 35) 555 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Oregon No 11.8 (10.9, 12.8) 37 (19, 49) 648 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Illinois No 12.6 (12.1, 13.2) 28 (16, 39) 2,035 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -0.6)
Minnesota No 11.4 (10.6, 12.2) 45 (25, 50) 827 stable stable trend -1.9 (-2.4, 0.1)
Montana No 12.6 (10.9, 14.6) 27 (7, 50) 199 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Ohio No 13.3 (12.7, 13.9) 18 (11, 31) 2,046 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -0.8)
Wisconsin No 11.7 (10.9, 12.5) 40 (23, 48) 900 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.3)
New Mexico No 12.6 (11.3, 14.0) 30 (10, 48) 350 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Hawaii No 12.4 (10.8, 14.1) 33 (9, 49) 255 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Louisiana No 15.8 (14.8, 16.9) 5 (2, 13) 890 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.1, 0.4)
South Carolina No 12.4 (11.6, 13.3) 32 (15, 45) 891 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -0.2)
South Dakota No 15.0 (12.8, 17.5) 9 (1, 42) 175 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 1.4)
West Virginia No 16.5 (14.9, 18.2) 4 (1, 13) 421 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Alabama No 14.7 (13.8, 15.7) 11 (4, 21) 971 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Alaska No 15.6 (12.7, 19.1) 8 (1, 45) 109 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Connecticut No 10.1 (9.2, 11.1) 50 (40, 51) 496 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.3)
Florida No 12.2 (11.8, 12.5) 35 (25, 42) 4,163 stable stable trend -1.4 (-1.9, 0.0)
California No 11.7 (11.3, 12.0) 41 (32, 46) 5,452 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Georgia No 13.2 (12.6, 13.9) 19 (12, 33) 1,649 stable stable trend -1.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Colorado No 10.7 (10.0, 11.6) 47 (35, 51) 727 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Idaho No 12.7 (11.2, 14.3) 26 (9, 48) 284 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
North Carolina No 12.6 (12.0, 13.2) 29 (16, 40) 1,709 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pennsylvania No 13.0 (12.5, 13.6) 21 (14, 34) 2,373 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.3, -0.5)
Vermont No 12.9 (10.6, 15.5) 24 (4, 51) 120 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 3.7)
Mississippi No 17.7 (16.3, 19.1) 1 (1, 8) 663 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Arizona No 12.5 (11.8, 13.2) 31 (16, 43) 1,238 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.2)
Indiana No 14.9 (14.0, 15.7) 10 (4, 18) 1,261 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Kansas No 13.6 (12.4, 14.9) 15 (7, 39) 489 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 1.5)
Maine No 11.7 (10.2, 13.3) 39 (14, 51) 247 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 3.2)
Virginia No 13.5 (12.8, 14.2) 16 (10, 31) 1,453 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Michigan No 12.9 (12.3, 13.6) 22 (14, 37) 1,718 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.7)
Oklahoma No 16.6 (15.4, 17.8) 3 (1, 11) 793 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.8)
Puerto Rico No 12.1 (11.1, 13.2) N/A 648 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.0, 4.9)
Washington No 11.8 (11.1, 12.6) 38 (23, 47) 1,089 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 2.6)
Nebraska No 13.4 (11.9, 14.9) 17 (6, 44) 322 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Texas No 14.0 (13.6, 14.4) 13 (9, 21) 4,398 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Kentucky No 17.5 (16.4, 18.6) 2 (1, 7) 997 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 2.1)
Tennessee No 15.7 (14.9, 16.6) 7 (2, 12) 1,384 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Arkansas No 15.8 (14.5, 17.1) 6 (1, 15) 613 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 3.5)
Missouri No 14.0 (13.2, 14.9) 12 (7, 27) 1,138 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 3.4)
Utah No 12.0 (10.8, 13.3) 36 (14, 50) 363 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.4, 5.8)
Wyoming No 13.2 (10.6, 16.2) 20 (2, 51) 98 stable stable trend 4.8 (-1.0, 13.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 1:29 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top