Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Adams County Rural Yes 51.6 (40.9, 64.3) 59 (9, 90) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Allen County Urban Yes 50.5 (47.3, 53.8) 64 (41, 77) 198 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Bartholomew County Urban Yes 51.4 (44.8, 58.8) 63 (24, 85) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Benton County Urban Yes 75.5 (53.3, 105.1) 3 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.5)
Blackford County Rural Yes 69.8 (52.0, 93.1) 9 (1, 88) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.2)
Boone County Urban Yes 39.9 (33.8, 46.8) 89 (59, 92) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Brown County Urban Yes 53.8 (39.8, 72.5) 51 (3, 91) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.0)
Carroll County Urban Yes 42.6 (31.3, 57.2) 84 (19, 92) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-26.7, -0.6)
Cass County Rural Yes 51.5 (42.0, 62.7) 61 (14, 89) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Clark County Urban Yes 60.5 (54.7, 66.8) 30 (11, 59) 85 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.3, 14.8)
Clay County Urban Yes 59.2 (46.9, 74.0) 33 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.8)
Clinton County Rural Yes 54.0 (43.4, 66.5) 50 (8, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Crawford County Rural Yes 52.2 (35.8, 75.0) 56 (2, 92) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.3)
Daviess County Rural Yes 51.4 (40.4, 64.6) 62 (6, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 56.7 (47.3, 67.6) 44 (7, 85) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Dearborn County Urban Yes 57.3 (48.6, 67.3) 43 (8, 79) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Decatur County Rural Yes 59.9 (47.5, 74.8) 31 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Delaware County Urban Yes 58.0 (51.6, 65.2) 40 (11, 70) 64 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Dubois County Rural Yes 38.4 (30.6, 47.8) 90 (53, 92) 18 falling falling trend -3.5 (-19.8, -0.7)
Elkhart County Urban Yes 50.1 (45.7, 54.7) 66 (37, 82) 103 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Fayette County Rural Yes 76.4 (60.8, 95.0) 2 (1, 56) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Floyd County Urban Yes 48.8 (42.4, 56.0) 67 (28, 88) 45 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Fountain County Rural Yes 74.7 (58.2, 94.9) 4 (1, 71) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.6)
Franklin County Urban Yes 66.2 (52.1, 83.3) 20 (1, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Fulton County Rural Yes 69.6 (54.3, 88.2) 11 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Gibson County Rural Yes 48.3 (38.5, 60.0) 69 (15, 91) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Grant County Rural Yes 69.0 (60.2, 78.7) 13 (1, 49) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Greene County Rural Yes 61.7 (50.1, 75.4) 27 (2, 82) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 30.8 (28.3, 33.5) 92 (88, 92) 114 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.7)
Hancock County Urban Yes 42.4 (36.4, 49.1) 85 (52, 91) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Harrison County Urban Yes 59.2 (49.0, 71.2) 32 (4, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Hendricks County Urban Yes 40.0 (36.0, 44.3) 88 (69, 91) 76 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Henry County Rural Yes 70.5 (60.5, 81.9) 8 (1, 50) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Howard County Urban Yes 66.7 (59.0, 75.2) 17 (3, 53) 60 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 5.7)
Huntington County Rural Yes 52.0 (42.3, 63.5) 57 (12, 90) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Jackson County Rural Yes 50.4 (41.9, 60.3) 65 (17, 89) 26 falling falling trend -4.9 (-20.0, -2.1)
Jasper County Urban Yes 47.5 (38.0, 58.9) 74 (20, 91) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.7)
Jay County Rural Yes 64.4 (49.4, 82.8) 22 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.1)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 61.8 (50.6, 74.9) 25 (2, 81) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Jennings County Rural Yes 70.5 (57.9, 85.4) 7 (1, 59) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Johnson County Urban Yes 45.1 (40.7, 50.0) 79 (52, 89) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Knox County Rural Yes 61.7 (50.9, 74.3) 26 (3, 76) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Kosciusko County Rural Yes 53.3 (46.3, 61.1) 53 (17, 84) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
LaGrange County Rural Yes 43.1 (34.0, 54.0) 81 (31, 92) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
LaPorte County Urban Yes 47.7 (42.2, 53.7) 72 (36, 88) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Lake County Urban Yes 45.5 (42.9, 48.2) 77 (60, 86) 254 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.5, -2.1)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 67.0 (57.1, 78.4) 16 (1, 63) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Madison County Urban Yes 58.5 (52.8, 64.6) 35 (11, 65) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Marion County Urban Yes 56.6 (54.4, 58.8) 45 (28, 56) 546 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Marshall County Rural Yes 52.4 (43.3, 63.1) 55 (14, 89) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Martin County Rural Yes 69.8 (48.3, 98.5) 10 (1, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.5)
Miami County Rural Yes 62.0 (51.3, 74.5) 24 (2, 80) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Monroe County Urban Yes 42.7 (37.5, 48.6) 83 (54, 91) 51 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 58.2 (47.6, 70.6) 37 (4, 86) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Morgan County Urban Yes 48.5 (42.0, 55.8) 68 (30, 89) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Newton County Urban Yes 42.9 (30.2, 60.2) 82 (15, 92) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.2)
Noble County Rural Yes 51.5 (42.9, 61.6) 60 (16, 88) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Ohio County Urban Yes 47.8 (30.1, 76.6) 71 (3, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.6)
Orange County Rural Yes 71.7 (55.9, 91.0) 6 (1, 72) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Owen County Urban Yes 67.1 (52.2, 85.2) 15 (1, 81) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 8.6)
Parke County Rural Yes 57.5 (42.0, 77.3) 42 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.0)
Perry County Rural Yes 41.5 (29.7, 56.9) 86 (21, 92) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.7)
Pike County Rural Yes 72.8 (52.8, 98.5) 5 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.7)
Porter County Urban Yes 44.9 (40.7, 49.5) 80 (54, 89) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Posey County Urban Yes 45.2 (34.4, 58.8) 78 (17, 92) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-18.7, 12.0)
Pulaski County Rural Yes 82.5 (60.9, 109.7) 1 (1, 72) 11 rising rising trend 9.4 (0.1, 24.1)
Putnam County Rural Yes 58.9 (48.7, 70.9) 34 (4, 81) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Randolph County Rural Yes 60.6 (47.7, 76.3) 29 (2, 86) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.0)
Ripley County Rural Yes 46.5 (36.0, 59.3) 75 (18, 91) 14 stable stable trend -2.4 (-13.1, 1.1)
Rush County Rural Yes 62.3 (46.4, 82.4) 23 (1, 89) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.2)
Scott County Rural Yes 66.5 (53.3, 82.2) 18 (1, 79) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Shelby County Urban Yes 55.9 (47.1, 66.1) 46 (9, 83) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Spencer County Rural Yes 57.6 (43.6, 75.2) 41 (2, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
St. Joseph County Urban Yes 51.9 (48.0, 56.0) 58 (34, 75) 143 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Starke County Rural Yes 69.4 (55.7, 85.8) 12 (1, 69) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Steuben County Rural Yes 48.1 (38.4, 59.7) 70 (18, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Sullivan County Urban Yes 53.5 (40.8, 69.5) 52 (4, 91) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.1)
Switzerland County Rural Yes 54.2 (36.6, 78.5) 49 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.9)
Tippecanoe County Urban Yes 45.8 (41.0, 50.9) 76 (47, 89) 71 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Tipton County Urban Yes 54.6 (39.9, 73.8) 48 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Union County Rural Yes 64.6 (41.1, 98.3) 21 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.4)
Vanderburgh County Urban Yes 58.4 (53.5, 63.7) 36 (15, 63) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Vermillion County Urban Yes 68.2 (51.0, 89.8) 14 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.5)
Vigo County Urban Yes 66.4 (59.4, 74.1) 19 (3, 47) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Wabash County Rural Yes 58.2 (46.9, 71.8) 38 (4, 86) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Warren County Urban Yes 33.3 (18.2, 57.2) 91 (18, 92) 3 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.2, 0.2)
Warrick County Urban Yes 40.8 (34.3, 48.3) 87 (50, 92) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.9)
Washington County Urban Yes 58.2 (46.2, 72.5) 39 (3, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Wayne County Rural Yes 61.6 (53.5, 70.6) 28 (5, 68) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Wells County Urban Yes 47.7 (36.8, 61.0) 73 (14, 92) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
White County Rural Yes 54.9 (42.7, 69.7) 47 (4, 90) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Whitley County Urban Yes 52.7 (43.0, 64.3) 54 (12, 89) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 1:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top