Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Indiana by County
All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65
Sorted by Count
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion County | Urban | Yes | 56.6 (54.4, 58.8) | 45 (28, 56) | 546 |
falling 
|
-1.6 (-2.0, -1.2) |
| Lake County | Urban | Yes | 45.5 (42.9, 48.2) | 77 (60, 86) | 254 |
falling
|
-4.0 (-6.5, -2.1) |
| Allen County | Urban | Yes | 50.5 (47.3, 53.8) | 64 (41, 77) | 198 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| St. Joseph County | Urban | Yes | 51.9 (48.0, 56.0) | 58 (34, 75) | 143 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| Hamilton County | Urban | Yes | 30.8 (28.3, 33.5) | 92 (88, 92) | 114 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.4, -1.7) |
| Vanderburgh County | Urban | Yes | 58.4 (53.5, 63.7) | 36 (15, 63) | 114 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Elkhart County | Urban | Yes | 50.1 (45.7, 54.7) | 66 (37, 82) | 103 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Porter County | Urban | Yes | 44.9 (40.7, 49.5) | 80 (54, 89) | 89 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.5, -1.0) |
| Clark County | Urban | Yes | 60.5 (54.7, 66.8) | 30 (11, 59) | 85 |
stable 
|
4.2 (-2.3, 14.8) |
| Madison County | Urban | Yes | 58.5 (52.8, 64.6) | 35 (11, 65) | 85 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.3, 0.6) |
| Johnson County | Urban | Yes | 45.1 (40.7, 50.0) | 79 (52, 89) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.1, -0.7) |
| Hendricks County | Urban | Yes | 40.0 (36.0, 44.3) | 88 (69, 91) | 76 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.7, -1.1) |
| Tippecanoe County | Urban | Yes | 45.8 (41.0, 50.9) | 76 (47, 89) | 71 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.0, -1.5) |
| Vigo County | Urban | Yes | 66.4 (59.4, 74.1) | 19 (3, 47) | 70 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.3) |
| Delaware County | Urban | Yes | 58.0 (51.6, 65.2) | 40 (11, 70) | 64 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.4, 0.0) |
| LaPorte County | Urban | Yes | 47.7 (42.2, 53.7) | 72 (36, 88) | 60 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.8, -1.0) |
| Howard County | Urban | Yes | 66.7 (59.0, 75.2) | 17 (3, 53) | 60 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.4, 5.7) |
| Monroe County | Urban | Yes | 42.7 (37.5, 48.6) | 83 (54, 91) | 51 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.0, -0.7) |
| Grant County | Rural | Yes | 69.0 (60.2, 78.7) | 13 (1, 49) | 50 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.3, 0.6) |
| Wayne County | Rural | Yes | 61.6 (53.5, 70.6) | 28 (5, 68) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.0, 0.6) |
| Kosciusko County | Rural | Yes | 53.3 (46.3, 61.1) | 53 (17, 84) | 45 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
| Floyd County | Urban | Yes | 48.8 (42.4, 56.0) | 67 (28, 88) | 45 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.6, -1.4) |
| Bartholomew County | Urban | Yes | 51.4 (44.8, 58.8) | 63 (24, 85) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.5, -0.1) |
| Morgan County | Urban | Yes | 48.5 (42.0, 55.8) | 68 (30, 89) | 44 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.2, 0.1) |
| Henry County | Rural | Yes | 70.5 (60.5, 81.9) | 8 (1, 50) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.3, 1.1) |
| Hancock County | Urban | Yes | 42.4 (36.4, 49.1) | 85 (52, 91) | 38 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.2, 0.0) |
| Lawrence County | Rural | Yes | 67.0 (57.1, 78.4) | 16 (1, 63) | 35 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.4) |
| Dearborn County | Urban | Yes | 57.3 (48.6, 67.3) | 43 (8, 79) | 34 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.6, 0.5) |
| Boone County | Urban | Yes | 39.9 (33.8, 46.8) | 89 (59, 92) | 32 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.3, -1.3) |
| Shelby County | Urban | Yes | 55.9 (47.1, 66.1) | 46 (9, 83) | 31 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.9, -0.2) |
| Warrick County | Urban | Yes | 40.8 (34.3, 48.3) | 87 (50, 92) | 30 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.9, -0.9) |
| DeKalb County | Rural | Yes | 56.7 (47.3, 67.6) | 44 (7, 85) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.6) |
| Noble County | Rural | Yes | 51.5 (42.9, 61.6) | 60 (16, 88) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.0, -0.5) |
| Harrison County | Urban | Yes | 59.2 (49.0, 71.2) | 32 (4, 81) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
| Jackson County | Rural | Yes | 50.4 (41.9, 60.3) | 65 (17, 89) | 26 |
falling
|
-4.9 (-20.0, -2.1) |
| Knox County | Rural | Yes | 61.7 (50.9, 74.3) | 26 (3, 76) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.0, 1.8) |
| Marshall County | Rural | Yes | 52.4 (43.3, 63.1) | 55 (14, 89) | 25 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.0, 0.1) |
| Putnam County | Rural | Yes | 58.9 (48.7, 70.9) | 34 (4, 81) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.7, 0.8) |
| Miami County | Rural | Yes | 62.0 (51.3, 74.5) | 24 (2, 80) | 25 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.0) |
| Jefferson County | Rural | Yes | 61.8 (50.6, 74.9) | 25 (2, 81) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.8, 1.3) |
| Jennings County | Rural | Yes | 70.5 (57.9, 85.4) | 7 (1, 59) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.0, 0.9) |
| Montgomery County | Rural | Yes | 58.2 (47.6, 70.6) | 37 (4, 86) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.5, 1.5) |
| Whitley County | Urban | Yes | 52.7 (43.0, 64.3) | 54 (12, 89) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.6, 0.4) |
| Greene County | Rural | Yes | 61.7 (50.1, 75.4) | 27 (2, 82) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.6, 0.3) |
| Cass County | Rural | Yes | 51.5 (42.0, 62.7) | 61 (14, 89) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Huntington County | Rural | Yes | 52.0 (42.3, 63.5) | 57 (12, 90) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.8, 0.5) |
| Wabash County | Rural | Yes | 58.2 (46.9, 71.8) | 38 (4, 86) | 20 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.7, 1.8) |
| Starke County | Rural | Yes | 69.4 (55.7, 85.8) | 12 (1, 69) | 20 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.3, -0.6) |
| Clinton County | Rural | Yes | 54.0 (43.4, 66.5) | 50 (8, 88) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.1, 0.6) |
| Steuben County | Rural | Yes | 48.1 (38.4, 59.7) | 70 (18, 91) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.6) |
| Scott County | Rural | Yes | 66.5 (53.3, 82.2) | 18 (1, 79) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Jasper County | Urban | Yes | 47.5 (38.0, 58.9) | 74 (20, 91) | 19 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.5, -0.7) |
| Dubois County | Rural | Yes | 38.4 (30.6, 47.8) | 90 (53, 92) | 18 |
falling
|
-3.5 (-19.8, -0.7) |
| Fayette County | Rural | Yes | 76.4 (60.8, 95.0) | 2 (1, 56) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.1, 0.9) |
| Washington County | Urban | Yes | 58.2 (46.2, 72.5) | 39 (3, 87) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.5, 0.8) |
| Gibson County | Rural | Yes | 48.3 (38.5, 60.0) | 69 (15, 91) | 18 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.2, -1.0) |
| Clay County | Urban | Yes | 59.2 (46.9, 74.0) | 33 (2, 87) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.2, 0.8) |
| Decatur County | Rural | Yes | 59.9 (47.5, 74.8) | 31 (2, 87) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.8, 0.6) |
| Adams County | Rural | Yes | 51.6 (40.9, 64.3) | 59 (9, 90) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.7) |
| Franklin County | Urban | Yes | 66.2 (52.1, 83.3) | 20 (1, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.4, 1.6) |
| Owen County | Urban | Yes | 67.1 (52.2, 85.2) | 15 (1, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.9, 8.6) |
| Randolph County | Rural | Yes | 60.6 (47.7, 76.3) | 29 (2, 86) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.2, 1.0) |
| Daviess County | Rural | Yes | 51.4 (40.4, 64.6) | 62 (6, 91) | 16 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.8, 2.7) |
| LaGrange County | Rural | Yes | 43.1 (34.0, 54.0) | 81 (31, 92) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-2.7, 0.1) |
| Fulton County | Rural | Yes | 69.6 (54.3, 88.2) | 11 (1, 75) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.9, 1.3) |
| Orange County | Rural | Yes | 71.7 (55.9, 91.0) | 6 (1, 72) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.8, 0.3) |
| White County | Rural | Yes | 54.9 (42.7, 69.7) | 47 (4, 90) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.2, 0.6) |
| Fountain County | Rural | Yes | 74.7 (58.2, 94.9) | 4 (1, 71) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.3, 1.6) |
| Ripley County | Rural | Yes | 46.5 (36.0, 59.3) | 75 (18, 91) | 14 |
stable
|
-2.4 (-13.1, 1.1) |
| Wells County | Urban | Yes | 47.7 (36.8, 61.0) | 73 (14, 92) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.8, 1.3) |
| Jay County | Rural | Yes | 64.4 (49.4, 82.8) | 22 (1, 84) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.4, 2.1) |
| Posey County | Urban | Yes | 45.2 (34.4, 58.8) | 78 (17, 92) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-18.7, 12.0) |
| Spencer County | Rural | Yes | 57.6 (43.6, 75.2) | 41 (2, 90) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.9, 1.3) |
| Sullivan County | Urban | Yes | 53.5 (40.8, 69.5) | 52 (4, 91) | 12 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.9, -1.1) |
| Vermillion County | Urban | Yes | 68.2 (51.0, 89.8) | 14 (1, 84) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.6, 0.5) |
| Brown County | Urban | Yes | 53.8 (39.8, 72.5) | 51 (3, 91) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-3.3, 2.0) |
| Rush County | Rural | Yes | 62.3 (46.4, 82.4) | 23 (1, 89) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.7, -0.2) |
| Pulaski County | Rural | Yes | 82.5 (60.9, 109.7) | 1 (1, 72) | 11 |
rising 
|
9.4 (0.1, 24.1) |
| Blackford County | Rural | Yes | 69.8 (52.0, 93.1) | 9 (1, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.0, 0.2) |
| Carroll County | Urban | Yes | 42.6 (31.3, 57.2) | 84 (19, 92) | 10 |
falling
|
-3.5 (-26.7, -0.6) |
| Parke County | Rural | Yes | 57.5 (42.0, 77.3) | 42 (1, 91) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.6, 1.0) |
| Tipton County | Urban | Yes | 54.6 (39.9, 73.8) | 48 (2, 91) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.5, 1.8) |
| Pike County | Rural | Yes | 72.8 (52.8, 98.5) | 5 (1, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.8, 2.7) |
| Perry County | Rural | Yes | 41.5 (29.7, 56.9) | 86 (21, 92) | 9 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-5.1, -0.7) |
| Newton County | Urban | Yes | 42.9 (30.2, 60.2) | 82 (15, 92) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.9, -1.2) |
| Benton County | Urban | Yes | 75.5 (53.3, 105.1) | 3 (1, 86) | 8 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.7, 3.5) |
| Martin County | Rural | Yes | 69.8 (48.3, 98.5) | 10 (1, 89) | 8 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.0, 3.5) |
| Crawford County | Rural | Yes | 52.2 (35.8, 75.0) | 56 (2, 92) | 7 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-5.1, -1.3) |
| Switzerland County | Rural | Yes | 54.2 (36.6, 78.5) | 49 (1, 92) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-4.2, 0.9) |
| Union County | Rural | Yes | 64.6 (41.1, 98.3) | 21 (1, 92) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-4.5, 2.4) |
| Ohio County | Urban | Yes | 47.8 (30.1, 76.6) | 71 (3, 92) | 4 |
stable
|
-2.4 (-5.3, 0.6) |
| Warren County | Urban | Yes | 33.3 (18.2, 57.2) | 91 (18, 92) | 3 |
stable
|
-3.5 (-8.2, 0.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/30/2026 9:58 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).
Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.