Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A Yes 51.9 (51.1, 52.6) N/A 3,796 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States N/A Yes 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) N/A 158,490 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Jackson County Rural Yes 50.4 (41.9, 60.3) 65 (17, 89) 26 falling falling trend -4.9 (-20.0, -2.1)
Lake County Urban Yes 45.5 (42.9, 48.2) 77 (60, 86) 254 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.5, -2.1)
Carroll County Urban Yes 42.6 (31.3, 57.2) 84 (19, 92) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-26.7, -0.6)
Dubois County Rural Yes 38.4 (30.6, 47.8) 90 (53, 92) 18 falling falling trend -3.5 (-19.8, -0.7)
Warren County Urban Yes 33.3 (18.2, 57.2) 91 (18, 92) 3 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.2, 0.2)
Crawford County Rural Yes 52.2 (35.8, 75.0) 56 (2, 92) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.3)
Newton County Urban Yes 42.9 (30.2, 60.2) 82 (15, 92) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.2)
Perry County Rural Yes 41.5 (29.7, 56.9) 86 (21, 92) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.7)
Floyd County Urban Yes 48.8 (42.4, 56.0) 67 (28, 88) 45 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 30.8 (28.3, 33.5) 92 (88, 92) 114 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.7)
Ohio County Urban Yes 47.8 (30.1, 76.6) 71 (3, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.6)
Ripley County Rural Yes 46.5 (36.0, 59.3) 75 (18, 91) 14 stable stable trend -2.4 (-13.1, 1.1)
Sullivan County Urban Yes 53.5 (40.8, 69.5) 52 (4, 91) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.1)
Boone County Urban Yes 39.9 (33.8, 46.8) 89 (59, 92) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Warrick County Urban Yes 40.8 (34.3, 48.3) 87 (50, 92) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.9)
Tippecanoe County Urban Yes 45.8 (41.0, 50.9) 76 (47, 89) 71 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Gibson County Rural Yes 48.3 (38.5, 60.0) 69 (15, 91) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Jasper County Urban Yes 47.5 (38.0, 58.9) 74 (20, 91) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.7)
Hendricks County Urban Yes 40.0 (36.0, 44.3) 88 (69, 91) 76 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
LaPorte County Urban Yes 47.7 (42.2, 53.7) 72 (36, 88) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Starke County Rural Yes 69.4 (55.7, 85.8) 12 (1, 69) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Monroe County Urban Yes 42.7 (37.5, 48.6) 83 (54, 91) 51 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Rush County Rural Yes 62.3 (46.4, 82.4) 23 (1, 89) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.2)
Noble County Rural Yes 51.5 (42.9, 61.6) 60 (16, 88) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Porter County Urban Yes 44.9 (40.7, 49.5) 80 (54, 89) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Marion County Urban Yes 56.6 (54.4, 58.8) 45 (28, 56) 546 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Switzerland County Rural Yes 54.2 (36.6, 78.5) 49 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.9)
Shelby County Urban Yes 55.9 (47.1, 66.1) 46 (9, 83) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Vermillion County Urban Yes 68.2 (51.0, 89.8) 14 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.5)
Johnson County Urban Yes 45.1 (40.7, 50.0) 79 (52, 89) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Marshall County Rural Yes 52.4 (43.3, 63.1) 55 (14, 89) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Bartholomew County Urban Yes 51.4 (44.8, 58.8) 63 (24, 85) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Blackford County Rural Yes 69.8 (52.0, 93.1) 9 (1, 88) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.2)
Cass County Rural Yes 51.5 (42.0, 62.7) 61 (14, 89) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
LaGrange County Rural Yes 43.1 (34.0, 54.0) 81 (31, 92) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Scott County Rural Yes 66.5 (53.3, 82.2) 18 (1, 79) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
White County Rural Yes 54.9 (42.7, 69.7) 47 (4, 90) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Elkhart County Urban Yes 50.1 (45.7, 54.7) 66 (37, 82) 103 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Orange County Rural Yes 71.7 (55.9, 91.0) 6 (1, 72) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Parke County Rural Yes 57.5 (42.0, 77.3) 42 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.0)
St. Joseph County Urban Yes 51.9 (48.0, 56.0) 58 (34, 75) 143 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Vanderburgh County Urban Yes 58.4 (53.5, 63.7) 36 (15, 63) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Allen County Urban Yes 50.5 (47.3, 53.8) 64 (41, 77) 198 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Clay County Urban Yes 59.2 (46.9, 74.0) 33 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.8)
Greene County Rural Yes 61.7 (50.1, 75.4) 27 (2, 82) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Hancock County Urban Yes 42.4 (36.4, 49.1) 85 (52, 91) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Huntington County Rural Yes 52.0 (42.3, 63.5) 57 (12, 90) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Miami County Rural Yes 62.0 (51.3, 74.5) 24 (2, 80) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Whitley County Urban Yes 52.7 (43.0, 64.3) 54 (12, 89) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Dearborn County Urban Yes 57.3 (48.6, 67.3) 43 (8, 79) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Morgan County Urban Yes 48.5 (42.0, 55.8) 68 (30, 89) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Randolph County Rural Yes 60.6 (47.7, 76.3) 29 (2, 86) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.0)
Union County Rural Yes 64.6 (41.1, 98.3) 21 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.4)
Fountain County Rural Yes 74.7 (58.2, 94.9) 4 (1, 71) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.6)
Putnam County Rural Yes 58.9 (48.7, 70.9) 34 (4, 81) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Clinton County Rural Yes 54.0 (43.4, 66.5) 50 (8, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Kosciusko County Rural Yes 53.3 (46.3, 61.1) 53 (17, 84) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Spencer County Rural Yes 57.6 (43.6, 75.2) 41 (2, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Washington County Urban Yes 58.2 (46.2, 72.5) 39 (3, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Delaware County Urban Yes 58.0 (51.6, 65.2) 40 (11, 70) 64 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Wayne County Rural Yes 61.6 (53.5, 70.6) 28 (5, 68) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Wells County Urban Yes 47.7 (36.8, 61.0) 73 (14, 92) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Adams County Rural Yes 51.6 (40.9, 64.3) 59 (9, 90) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Brown County Urban Yes 53.8 (39.8, 72.5) 51 (3, 91) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.0)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 56.7 (47.3, 67.6) 44 (7, 85) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Decatur County Rural Yes 59.9 (47.5, 74.8) 31 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Fayette County Rural Yes 76.4 (60.8, 95.0) 2 (1, 56) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Jennings County Rural Yes 70.5 (57.9, 85.4) 7 (1, 59) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 67.0 (57.1, 78.4) 16 (1, 63) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Posey County Urban Yes 45.2 (34.4, 58.8) 78 (17, 92) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-18.7, 12.0)
Steuben County Rural Yes 48.1 (38.4, 59.7) 70 (18, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Jay County Rural Yes 64.4 (49.4, 82.8) 22 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.1)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 58.2 (47.6, 70.6) 37 (4, 86) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Vigo County Urban Yes 66.4 (59.4, 74.1) 19 (3, 47) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Franklin County Urban Yes 66.2 (52.1, 83.3) 20 (1, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Fulton County Rural Yes 69.6 (54.3, 88.2) 11 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Grant County Rural Yes 69.0 (60.2, 78.7) 13 (1, 49) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 61.8 (50.6, 74.9) 25 (2, 81) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Madison County Urban Yes 58.5 (52.8, 64.6) 35 (11, 65) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Tipton County Urban Yes 54.6 (39.9, 73.8) 48 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Harrison County Urban Yes 59.2 (49.0, 71.2) 32 (4, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Henry County Rural Yes 70.5 (60.5, 81.9) 8 (1, 50) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Knox County Rural Yes 61.7 (50.9, 74.3) 26 (3, 76) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Benton County Urban Yes 75.5 (53.3, 105.1) 3 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.5)
Pike County Rural Yes 72.8 (52.8, 98.5) 5 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.7)
Wabash County Rural Yes 58.2 (46.9, 71.8) 38 (4, 86) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Martin County Rural Yes 69.8 (48.3, 98.5) 10 (1, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.5)
Howard County Urban Yes 66.7 (59.0, 75.2) 17 (3, 53) 60 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 5.7)
Daviess County Rural Yes 51.4 (40.4, 64.6) 62 (6, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.7)
Owen County Urban Yes 67.1 (52.2, 85.2) 15 (1, 81) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 8.6)
Clark County Urban Yes 60.5 (54.7, 66.8) 30 (11, 59) 85 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.3, 14.8)
Pulaski County Rural Yes 82.5 (60.9, 109.7) 1 (1, 72) 11 rising rising trend 9.4 (0.1, 24.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 5:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top